Skip to content

Comparison of Two Photobiomodulation Systems for Facial Nerve Dysfunction Following TMJ Surgery

Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of Two Photobiomodulation Systems for Facial Nerve Dysfunction Following Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07771933
Enrollment
24
Registered
2026-08-19
Start date
2022-05-12
Completion date
2026-06-22
Last updated
2026-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Facial Nerve Dysfunction

Keywords

Facial Nerve Dysfunction, Temporomandibular Joint Surgery, Photobiomodulation Therapy, Low-Level Laser Therapy, Facial Nerve Recovery

Brief summary

This randomized clinical trial compared two photobiomodulation systems for the management of postoperative facial nerve dysfunction following temporomandibular joint surgery. Patients who developed clinically detectable facial nerve dysfunction after open temporomandibular joint surgery were randomly assigned to receive photobiomodulation using either the GRR Laser system or the SiroLaser Advance Plus system. Photobiomodulation was initiated on the first postoperative day and consisted of 15 treatment sessions. Facial nerve recovery was evaluated using the House-Brackmann Grading System, the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System, and the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) Scale during a 60-day follow-up period.

Detailed description

This prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted in patients who developed postoperative facial nerve dysfunction following open temporomandibular joint surgery. Eligible participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to one of two active photobiomodulation treatment groups using a computer-generated block randomization sequence. Participants assigned to the GRR Laser group received extraoral transcutaneous photobiomodulation using a dual-wavelength 650-nm and 904-nm laser/LED system. Participants assigned to the SiroLaser Advance Plus group received extraoral transcutaneous photobiomodulation using a 660-nm continuous-wave diode laser. In both groups, irradiation was applied along the anatomical projection of the clinically affected facial nerve branches on the operated side. Photobiomodulation treatment was initiated on the first postoperative day. Treatment was administered daily during the first five postoperative days and every other day thereafter, for a total of 15 treatment sessions. Each treatment session lasted approximately 10 minutes. Facial nerve function was evaluated on postoperative days 5, 7, 10, 30, and 60. Clinical assessments included the House-Brackmann Grading System and the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System. Patient-reported functional status and quality of life were assessed using the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) Scale. The first standardized outcome assessment was performed on postoperative day 5; therefore, this assessment represented the first standardized postoperative evaluation rather than a pretreatment baseline.

Interventions

DEVICEGRR Laser Photobiomodulation System

Extraoral transcutaneous photobiomodulation was delivered using the GRR Laser system, a dual-wavelength 650-nm and 904-nm laser/LED system. Treatment was applied along the anatomical projection of the clinically affected facial nerve branches. Treatment began on the first postoperative day and consisted of 15 sessions, administered daily during the first 5 postoperative days and every other day thereafter. Each session lasted approximately 10 minutes.

DEVICESiroLaser Advance Plus

Extraoral transcutaneous photobiomodulation was delivered using the SiroLaser Advance Plus system in SoftLase mode. Irradiation was provided using a 660-nm continuous-wave diode laser with an output power of 25 mW through an 8-mm fiber-optic tip. Treatment was applied along the anatomical projection of the clinically affected facial nerve branches. Treatment began on the first postoperative day and consisted of 15 sessions using the same treatment schedule as the GRR Laser group.

Sponsors

Ankara University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel active photobiomodulation treatment groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who underwent open temporomandibular joint surgery. * Presence of clinically confirmed postoperative facial nerve dysfunction. * Willingness to comply with the follow-up protocol and attend scheduled follow-up visits. * Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Pre-existing facial nerve paralysis or facial nerve dysfunction before surgery. * History of central neurological disease. * Previous surgery involving the facial nerve. * History of head and neck malignancy and/or chemotherapy or radiotherapy that could potentially affect facial nerve function.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Sunnybrook Facial Grading System ScoreFrom postoperative day 5 to postoperative day 60The Sunnybrook Facial Grading System was used to assess facial nerve function based on resting symmetry, voluntary facial movement, and synkinesis. The composite score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better facial nerve function. The change score was calculated as the postoperative day 60 score minus the postoperative day 5 score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
House-Brackmann Grading SystemPostoperative days 5, 7, 10, 30, and 60Facial nerve function was graded using the House-Brackmann Grading System, which classifies facial nerve function from Grade I (normal function) to Grade VI (complete paralysis), with higher grades indicating greater dysfunction.
Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE) ScalePostoperative days 5, 7, 10, 30, and 60The FaCE Scale is a 15-item patient-reported measure assessing facial movement, facial comfort, oral function, eye comfort, lacrimal control, and social function. Total scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better facial function and quality of life.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMehmet Emre Yurttutan, DDS, PhD

Ankara University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 20, 2026