Skip to content

Influence of Implantation Technique on Rotational Stability of a Frosted-Haptic Toric Intraocular Lens: A Prospective Contralateral-Eye Study

Influence of Implantation Technique on Rotational Stability of a Frosted-Haptic Toric Intraocular Lens: A Prospective Contralateral-Eye Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07768722
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-08-17
Start date
2026-04-10
Completion date
2026-08-30
Last updated
2026-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract With Pre-existing Regular Corneal Astigmatism

Keywords

Cataract surgery, Toric Intraocular Lens, TECNIS Eyhance Toric II, Rotational Stability, Hydroimplantation, Balanced Salt Solution (BSS), Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device (OVD), Corneal Astigmatism, Refractive Outcomes, Intraocular Lens Implantation

Brief summary

This prospective, randomized contralateral-eye study evaluates whether the implantation technique influences the rotational stability and refractive outcomes of the TECNIS Eyhance™ Toric II intraocular lens (IOL) during cataract surgery. Although balanced salt solution (BSS) hydroimplantation has been proposed to reduce postoperative IOL rotation by eliminating retained ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD), the effect of implantation technique on the rotational stability of modern frosted-haptic toric IOLs remains uncertain. Patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery with regular corneal astigmatism receive TECNIS Eyhance™ Toric II IOLs in both eyes. One eye is randomized to OVD-assisted implantation and the fellow eye to BSS-assisted hydroimplantation. The primary outcome is postoperative rotational stability assessed using OPD-Scan III at postoperative day 1, week 1, and month 1. Secondary outcomes include postoperative refractive astigmatism, astigmatic prediction error, and visual acuity. The study aims to determine whether implantation technique influences postoperative rotational stability or refractive performance when using a contemporary frosted-haptic toric IOL.

Interventions

PROCEDUREOVD-assisted Implantation

Implantation of the TECNIS Eyhance Toric II intraocular lens using a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device.

PROCEDUREBSS-assisted hydroimplantation

Implantation of the TECNIS Eyhance Toric II intraocular lens using balanced salt solution instead of an ophthalmic viscosurgical device.

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Al Watany Eye Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults with senile cataract requiring bilateral cataract surgery. * Regular corneal astigmatism of ≥1.00 diopter. * Axial length between 22.0 mm and 25.0 mm. * Eligible for implantation with the TECNIS Eyhance™ Toric II intraocular lens. * Able and willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Inconsistent corneal astigmatism measurements (difference \>0.20 D in magnitude or \>5° in axis among the four diagnostic devices). * Visually significant dry eye disease with positive corneal fluorescein staining. Irregular corneal astigmatism or corneal opacity. * Ocular comorbidities that could affect toric IOL stability or visual outcomes (e.g., pseudoexfoliation syndrome, advanced glaucoma, or macular pathology). * Intraoperative complications or generalized zonular weakness requiring implantation of a capsular tension ring. * Significant postoperative day 1 corneal edema precluding reliable rotational measurements. * Inability to comply with the follow-up schedule.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute rotational stability of the TECNIS Eyhance Toric II intraocular lensPostoperative day 1, week 1, and month 1Absolute intraocular lens rotation (degrees) measured relative to the final intraoperative implantation axis using the OPD-Scan III. Rotation was calculated as the absolute angular difference between the intraoperative reference axis and the postoperative axis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Residual refractive astigmatism3 months after surgeryPostoperative refractive astigmatism measured at the corneal plane by manifest refraction.
Astigmatic prediction error3 months after surgeryAbsolute prediction error calculated as the absolute difference between the predicted and postoperative refractive astigmatism.
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UDVA)3 months after surgeryMonocular uncorrected distance visual acuity measured using a standardized visual acuity chart.
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA)3 months after surgery

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAhmed Assaf, MD, PhD

Ainshams University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 18, 2026