Skip to content

A One-year Follow-up of Incisional Hernia Formation Between Device Assisted and Manual Laparotomy Closure

A One-year Follow-up Comparison of Incisional Hernia Formation Between Device Assisted and Manual Closure in Patients Undergoing Elective Laparotomy for Colorectal Diseases

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07766044
Enrollment
218
Registered
2026-08-14
Start date
2026-07-18
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2026-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Incisional Hernia After Midline Laparotomy

Keywords

Laparotomy, Incisional hernia, Device assisted closure, Small-bites, Burst abdomen, Wound infection, Laparotomy closure

Brief summary

The study compares one-year incisional hernia formation between two cohorts of patients that underwent open surgery for colorectal diseases. The patients had the abdominal wall closure performed with either a device for standardized closure or manual closure. The devices aims to secure the closure technique that is advocated by guidelines and could potentially reduce abdominal wall complications. Upholding closure quality can be cumbersome and time consuming and hence inferior closure can sometimes be associated with manual closure. Follow-up will include short term complications like wound infection and burst abdomen and one-year follow-up include a review of patients chart and CTscans performed as part of standard clinical practice.

Detailed description

This is a single center retrospective study, comparing short and long term abdominal wall related complications among a cohort of 38 patients that underwent abdominal wall closure with a device for standardized laparotomy closure, and a cohort of 180 patients that underwent closure with manual technique during 2020 to 2023. Included patients were selected for open surgery for colorectal disease according to institutions standard practice. Patients will be identified from a previous study on the device for standardized laparotomy closure and the controls will be identified through the operation administrative system. Data on short term complications will be retrieved from the patients chart and incisional hernia will be identified by reviewing the CTscans performed as a part of the standard clinical pathway. Reviewing will be performed according to the EHS classification for incisional hernia by two radiologists blinded for the closure technique. External statistic analysis will be perfromed. Data will be disseminated as a scientific publication.

Interventions

DEVICEDevice assisted laparotomy closure

SutureTOOL is a single patient device for standardized laparotomy closure. The devices use a 2/0 polydioxanone suture and secures a small-bites closure.

BEHAVIORALManual laparotomy closure

Standard practice of laparotomy closure using standard needle driver and curved needle

Sponsors

Suturion AB
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
Lund University
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Skåne Sweden
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Cohort study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>18 years of age * Patients selected for elective surgical procedure through a midline incision due to colorectal disease

Exclusion criteria

* Previous surgery including the midline * Previous hernia including the midline * Collagen disease * Disseminated disease at the time of surgery * Life expectancy less than 1 year.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incisional hernia at 1-year1-yearIncisional hernia detected by review of CT-scan or clinical examination or chart review revealing incisional hernia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound infection30 daysWound infection detected by reviewing patient chart
Suture length to wound length ratioAt the surgical procedure dateData collected by reviewing operative notes
Wound dehiscence30 days from surgical procedureWound dehiscence detected by review of patient chart.
Death due to abdominal wall related complication30 days

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 3, 2026