GLAUCOMA 1, OPEN ANGLE, D (Disorder)
Conditions
Keywords
GLAUCOMA
Brief summary
this study seeks to compare the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer and iCare COMPASS for both clinical accuracy and operational advantages.
Interventions
This study will be a crossover study. Patients who express interest in taking part in the study will be evaluated using Humphrey SITA-faster, which is the current standard of care for visual perimetry, and the iCare COMPASS in the same visit. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups of alternating testing order with the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer vs the iCare COMPASS and vice versa. The mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, mean deviation cluster, and fixation plot results will be compared. For analysis, participants will be grouped according to the inclusion criteria.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* All consenting patients who arrive for glaucoma management appointments for objective(s) 2.1.1, 2.2.2 * Patient groups arriving for glaucoma management that will be targeted for enrollment include: glaucoma suspect patients, those with cataracts, optic atrophy, macular degeneration, macular pathology, and vascular diseases of the retina
Exclusion criteria
* Those who are unwilling or unable to provide consent * Those for which English is not their first language
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Visual Fields will be assessed via the current standard of care Humphrey SITA-Faster when available. The mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, mean deviation cluster, and fixation plot obtained will be compared with the same measures on the iCare | within 1-3 months post visit | Testing will be performed with either one or two encounters with the patient or as determined by the patients' clinician. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Indiana University