Skip to content

Cold Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Intermediate-Size Flat Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps

Cold Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Intermediate-Size Flat Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07764224
Enrollment
968
Registered
2026-08-13
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2029-02-01
Last updated
2026-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Polyps, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection

Brief summary

This multicenter, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (HS-EMR) for resection of intermediate-size (10-20 mm) flat nonpedunculated colorectal polyps.

Interventions

PROCEDURECold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR)

During CS-EMR, methylene blue-stained epinephrine saline is injected into the submucosa surrounding the lesion to achieve submucosal lifting. The polyp together with 1-2 mm of adjacent mucosa is subsequently tightly snared and mechanically transected.

PROCEDUREHot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (HS-EMR)

During HS-EMR, methylene blue-stained epinephrine saline is injected into the submucosa surrounding the lesion to achieve submucosal lifting. The snare is positioned around the lesion, and electrocautery is delivered via the electrosurgical generator for transection.

Sponsors

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Shunde First People's Hospital of Foshan
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Jiangmen Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
ZhuHai Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Longgang District People's Hospital of Shenzhen
CollaboratorOTHER
Yangjiang People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Third People's Hospital of Huizhou
CollaboratorOTHER
Longnan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sihui Wanlong Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Suixi People's Hospital of Zhanjiang
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Guzhen People's Hospital of Zhongshan
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Anyuan County People's Hospital of Ganzhou
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Shaoguan First People's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Yangchun People's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
ZhuZhou Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects aged 18-75 years, irrespective of gender; 2. Flat sessile colorectal polyps confirmed by colonoscopy, classified as Paris classification 0-Is or 0-IIa, with a measured diameter ranging from 10 to 20 mm; 3. Subjects voluntarily agree to receive endoscopic treatment and sign written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Colonoscopic findings suggestive of submucosal invasion or malignant transformation of colorectal polyps; 2. Previous history of colorectal surgery; 3. Previous history of inflammatory bowel disease, familial adenomatous polyposis, or colorectal cancer; 4. Failure to discontinue anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications for a minimum of 1 week prior to the procedure; 5. Known coagulation disorders or bleeding diathesis; 6. Pregnant or breastfeeding women; 7. Patients complicated with malignant tumors, severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, or other severe comorbidities that preclude tolerance to endoscopic resection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
complete resection rateWithin 14 daysAll five biopsy specimens harvested from the resection margins after EMR resection yielded negative pathological findings. These five biopsy samples consisted of four specimens collected from the four quadrants of the resection wound margin and one specimen obtained from the wound base.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
en bloc resection rateWithin one daysThe lesion was completely excised under endoscope and a single specimen was obtained.
Unresectable rate of CS-EMRWithin one dayA resection procedure that needed high-frequency electric current.
Intraprocedural bleedingWithin one dayIntraoperative arterial bleeding or active mucosal oozing lasting more than 30 seconds that requires endoscopic hemostatic intervention.
Intraprocedural perforationWithin one dayEndoscopic observation of perforation requiring sealing with clips
Procedural timeWithin one dayThe duration from the first occurrence of injection needle under endoscope visual field to complete removal of the resected polyp
Delayed bleedingWithin 14 dayshaemorrhage after colonoscopy requiring endoscopic haemostasis with 14 days.
Delayed perforationWithin 14 daysAny perforation within 14 days
Number of clips usedWithin one dayThe number of clips used for each resected polyp

Contacts

CONTACTZelong Han, MD
hanzelong2025@163.com+86 189-2506-1960
CONTACTBitao Lin, MD
linbitao1996@163.com+86 137-2532-1385

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 14, 2026