Dental Caries, Occlusal Caries
Conditions
Keywords
DIAGNOdent, Laser Fluorescence, Occlusal Caries, Hydrogen Peroxide, Prophylaxis Paste, Minimally Invasive Dentistry
Brief summary
This study compared two methods of cleaning stained pits and grooves (fissures) on the chewing surfaces of back teeth before measuring them with a laser fluorescence device (DIAGNOdent), which is used to help detect early tooth decay. In the same patients, one side of the mouth was treated with mechanical polishing using a prophylaxis paste, while the other side was treated with a 35% hydrogen peroxide gel. The study measured whether either cleaning method changed the device's readings, and if so, by how much. The results showed that the readings increased after both procedures, but the increase was larger after polishing than after hydrogen peroxide application. These findings may help clinicians better interpret DIAGNOdent readings after cleaning stained teeth.
Detailed description
In this randomized, single-blind, split-mouth clinical study, 126 posterior teeth from 24 adult participants with clinically visible occlusal fissure staining were evaluated. For each participant, opposing jaws were randomly assigned to receive either mechanical polishing with a fluoride-free prophylaxis paste (30 seconds) or a 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (15 minutes). DIAGNOdent Pen laser fluorescence measurements were recorded at three time points: baseline, after air-water spray cleaning and drying, and after the assigned surface procedure. Digital bite-wing radiographs were obtained as a non-invasive clinical reference. Within-group comparisons were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and between-protocol comparisons were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with patient as a random effect and surface procedure as a fixed effect.
Interventions
PROCEDUREMechanical Polishing with Fluoride-Free Prophylaxis Paste
Application of a fluoride-free prophylaxis paste (Cleanic, Kerr, Salerno, Italy) to the occlusal fissure area using a polishing brush attached to a micromotor operating at 10,000 rpm, for 30 seconds with light pressure using circular movements, followed by water spray rinse and air drying.
PROCEDURE35% Hydrogen Peroxide Application
Application of an in-office bleaching agent containing 35% hydrogen peroxide (Whiteness HP, FGM Dental, Brazil), prepared per manufacturer's instructions (3 drops peroxide, 1 drop thickener), covering the stained fissure areas for 15 minutes, followed by aspiration, water rinse, and air drying.
Sponsors
Özlem Erçin Sultanzade
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The radiograph assessor was blinded to the assigned surface procedure.
Intervention model description
Split-mouth design in which each participant received both interventions, with one procedure randomly assigned to each side of the mouth.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age between 18 and 65 years * Clinically visible staining in the fissures of at least two permanent posterior teeth * Absence of cavitation, restoration, or sensitivity in the involved teeth
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of restorations on the involved teeth * Evident cusp loss, wear, fracture, or cracks on the occlusal surface * Enamel cracks * Hypocalcification lesions
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in DIAGNOdent Score | Measured at baseline and immediately after the assigned surface procedure (within a single clinical session) | Change in DIAGNOdent Pen laser fluorescence score, calculated as the post-surface-procedure value minus the baseline value, measured at the deepest point of the occlusal fissure. The DIAGNOdent Pen (KaVo, Biberach, Germany) scale ranges from 0 to 99, with higher scores indicating greater fluorescence and a higher likelihood of caries-related or stain-related tissue changes. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DIAGNOdent Score Change After Air-Water Spray Cleaning | Baseline and immediately after air-water spray cleaning (single clinical session, same-day) | Change in DIAGNOdent score from baseline to after air-water spray cleaning and drying, prior to the assigned surface procedure. |
| Between-Group Comparison of DIAGNOdent Score Change | Baseline and immediately post-procedure (single clinical session, same-day) | Comparison of the post-procedure minus baseline DIAGNOdent score change between the mechanical polishing group and the 35% hydrogen peroxide group, analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORÖzlem Erçin Sultanzade
Istanbul Kent University
Outcome results
None listed