Skip to content

Hybrid Transobturator Tape Versus Conventional Synthetic Tape for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Hybrid Transobturator Tape Versus Conventional Synthetic Tape: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Safety, Efficacy, and Female Sexual Function

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07762300
Enrollment
90
Registered
2026-08-13
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Female Sexual Function, Hybrid Sling, Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI), Transobturator Tape

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial compares the safety, efficacy, and impact on female sexual function of a novel hybrid transobturator tape (combining an autologous rectus fascia strip with a polypropylene mesh) versus standard synthetic transobturator tape in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStandard Synthetic Transobturator Tape (TOT)

Outside-in transobturator tape procedure utilizing a full synthetic polypropylene tape positioned tension-free under the mid-urethra.

PROCEDUREHybrid Transobturator Tape Sling

Insertion of a composite graft (autologous rectus fascia strip harvested via a Pfannenstiel incision and sutured between polypropylene tape arms) positioned via the obturator foramen route with the biological tissue directly under the mid-urethra.

Sponsors

Benha University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients suffering from genuine stress urinary incontinence. * Failed conservative management (pelvic floor exercises, medical therapy) * Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Mixed urinary incontinence with predominant urge component. * High-grade pelvic organ prolapse (POP-Q Stage \>= II), which required surgical intervention. * Neurogenic bladder or voiding dysfunction (Post-void residual \> 100 ml). * Coagulopathy or active urinary tract infection. * Patients who underwent recent pelvic radiotherapy. * Previous incontinence surgery (recurrent cases).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of mesh-related complications (including vaginal erosion, extrusion, and chronic groin pain).Assessed at 6 months postoperatively.Evaluation of local tissue complications and adverse events associated with the sling material.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective cure rateAssessed at 6 months postoperatively.Clinical confirmation of urinary continence via standardized cough stress testing and urodynamic assessments (uroflowmetry and cystometry).
Subjective cure rate and patient satisfaction.Assessed at 6 months postoperatively.Measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. The PGI-I is a 7-point single-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 1 ("Very much better") to 7 ("Very much worse"). Lower scores indicate greater clinical improvement and higher patient satisfaction.
Impact on quality of life and female sexual function.Assessed at 6 months postoperativelyEvaluated using validated questionnaires including the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF). Total scores range from 0 to 21, where higher scores indicate greater severity of incontinence and worse impact on quality of life.
Female sexual function measured by the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)Assessed at 6 months postoperativelyEvaluated using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), covering 6 domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain). Total full-scale scores range from 2.0 to 36.0, where higher scores indicate better sexual function.
Total Operative TimeIntraoperative (from initial skin incision to final wound closure).Total time required to complete the surgical procedure, measured in minutes.
Length of Postoperative Hospital StayPostoperative Day 1 through hospital discharge (up to 7 days).Duration of hospital stay following surgery, measured in days.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTMahmoud Atef Abdel Aziz, MSc
atefmahmoud050@outlook.sa+201555056932

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 14, 2026