Apical Periodontitis, Necrotic Mandibular Molars
Conditions
Keywords
Minimally invasive endodontics
Brief summary
Statement of the problem: The effectiveness of minimally invasive endodontic treatments in managing necrotic pulp with apical periodontitis remains understudied. Aim of the study: This research aims to evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive versus traditional root canal treatments in patients with necrotic pulp associated with apical periodontitis. Material and methods: sixty healthy patients of both genders aged from 20 to 50 years old suffering from necrotic pulp associated with apical periodontitis in their lower first molars with four root canals will be included in this study. The initial assessment will include a preoperative CBCT scan. Participants will be randomly assigned according to the type of endodontic treatment to two groups; a traditional treatment group (Trad); in which a traditional access cavity design and root canal preparation extending three sizes beyond the initial apical file using taper .04 rotary files will be accomplished and a minimally invasive group (MI) in which a conservative access cavity and a conservative root canal preparation up to #20/.04 will be performed. Both groups will receive an identical irrigation protocol during root canal instrumentation augmented with passive ultrasonic activation. Immediately following biomechanical preparation, the root canals will be filled with single cone obturation technique. Root canal disinfection will be evaluated using a culture method in which two bacterial samplings will be collected, one before and another after the biomechanical preparation. Patients will be monitored over 12 months, concluding with a follow-up CBCT scan to assess periapical healing. Data will be collected and statistically analyzed.
Interventions
PROCEDURERoot canal treatment
Root canal treatment is done
Sponsors
Mohamed Ashraf Abdeen
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Participants with free medical history (category: American Society of Anaesthesiologists class I) from either gender aged from 20 to 50 years old. 2. Necrotic lower first molars with four root canals (two mesials and two distals). 3. Teeth have a periapical radiolucency with a diameter of 2-4 mm in CBCT images. 4. Teeth show root curvature of 10°-20° as described by Schnider. 5. Participant that indicated for single visit root canal treatment.
Exclusion criteria
1. Calcified or non-negotiatable teeth. 2. Participants who cannot apply for the follow-up schedule. 3. Teeth that show any signs of cracks or vertical root fractures. 4. Teeth that show less than 50% of sound coronal tooth structure. 5. Periodontally affected teeth.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | 1 year follow up | A case is deemed successful if there is no clinical signs and symptoms of infection or inflammation and radiographic bone healing. The success rate for each group will be determined by the ratio of successful cases to the total number of cases in that group. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Healing of periapical lesion | 1 year | The change in the size of periapical radiolucencies will be assessed through a comparison of CBCT images taken preoperatively and at the 12-month follow-up. This evaluation will be conducted by two independent operators who are not aware of the treatment group assignments to ensure unbiased results. |
| Bacterial load | Within 2 days after intervention | The bacterial levels within the root canals will be quantified at two critical stages of the treatment process: S1: Immediately following the creation of the access cavity, prior to initiating any cleaning or shaping procedures. This step is crucial for determining the initial bacterial load present in the root canal system. S2: Following irrigant activation. This measurement will provide insight into the efficacy of the cleaning and shaping procedures, as well as the irrigation protocol, in reducing the bacterial population within the canal. These bacterial samples will be collected using sterile a three size #15 paper points which will be inserted into the canals to absorb the canal contents. This method ensures a standardized approach to bacterial sampling at these specified stages of the treatment. |
| Treatment duration | During procedure | The total time taken to complete the treatment procedure, from the beginning of the access cavity preparation to the completion of obturation, will be meticulously recorded for each case. |
| Iatrogenic errors | During procedure | Any occurrences of iatrogenic errors, such as instrument separation, will be noted and recorded. This data will provide insight into the potential risks associated with each treatment approach. |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed