Skip to content

Comparison of CT-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis and Pharmacotherapy

Comparison of Analgesic Effects of CT-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis With Pharmacotherapy as Palliative Care of Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07761650
Enrollment
110
Registered
2026-08-12
Start date
2025-05-01
Completion date
2025-11-30
Last updated
2026-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Abdominal Malignancies, Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer

Keywords

Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies, Celiac Plexus Neurolysis, Pharmacotherapy, Palliative Care, Visual Analogue Scale, Pain Management

Brief summary

After enrolment, patients were randomly assigned to two groups by means of a lottery procedure, whereby each patient blindly chose one of two labelled slips, resulting in group assignment to receive. Group A patients were subjected to CT-guided celiac plexus neurolysis, and Group B patients to standard pharmacotherapy for managing the pain over a period of four weeks. CT-guided celiac plexus neurolysis under the supervision of the principal investigator, using local anaesthetic and absolute ethanol injection for neurolysis, was carried out using aseptic technique. Baseline demographic information, which included age, gender, nature of malignancy, and the duration of disease, was recorded using a predesigned proforma. Pain severity was measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a recognised 0-10 scale where 0 = no pain to 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain, at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. The major outcome measure was the average pain score at four weeks in both groups.

Interventions

PROCEDURECT-guided celiac plexus neurolysis

Under intermittent CT guidance, one or two 20-22-gauge Chiba needles are advanced via a posterior paravertebral approach to the anterolateral aspect of the aorta at the level of the celiac axis. Correct needle placement is confirmed by CT imaging and the injection of a small amount of nonionic contrast material to ensure appropriate spread and exclude intravascular or intrathecal positioning. Following negative aspiration for blood or cerebrospinal fluid, a test dose of local anesthetic (commonly 5-10 mL of 1% lidocaine) is administered to minimize procedural pain and assess for adverse effects. Subsequently, a neurolytic agent, typically 15-25 mL of 95-100% absolute alcohol or 6-10% phenol on each side depending on the technique used, is slowly injected under CT guidance to achieve circumferential spread around the celiac plexus. A final CT scan is obtained to document the distribution of the neurolytic solution and exclude immediate complications.

Patients will be provided with the standard oral and intravenous analgesics such as fentanyl and oxycodone.

Sponsors

Mayo Hospital Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Biopsy proven upper GI malignancy with severe abdominal pain * Patients aged 18 to 65 years of either gender

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant and lactating females * Anemia (hemoglobin \<10 g/dL) * Massive ascites * Chronic renal failure * Patients with known allergy or intolerance to drugs used during celiac plexus neurolysis (CT guided technique).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average pain score at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatmentBaseline to 4 weeksPain severity was measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a recognized 0-10 scale where zero is equivalent to no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain, at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 13, 2026