Skip to content

Randomized Controlled Trial of the SurgDiff Model for Predicting Surgical Difficulty to Help Choose Approach in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer

Randomized Controlled Trial of the SurgDiff Model for Predicting Surgical Difficulty to Help Choose Approach in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07761169
Enrollment
68
Registered
2026-08-12
Start date
2026-08-30
Completion date
2030-09-30
Last updated
2026-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rectal Cancer

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of utilizing the SurgDiff surgical difficulty prediction model to assist surgeons in formulating precise surgical plans.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAI-assisted decision-making

The SurgDiff model performs a difficulty assessment based on the patient's preoperative MRI scans and clinical data, thereby assisting the surgeon in formulating the surgical plan

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Pathological examination confirmed a diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma; radical surgery is recommended. 2. The inferior border of the tumor is ≥1 cm from the dentate line and ≤7 cm from the anal verge; 3. Preoperative staging was assessed in a stage of c/ycT1-3N0-2M0; 4. The cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, and other organ functions are adequate, and the patient can tolerate laparoscopic surgery.

Exclusion criteria

1. Intraoperative exploration is unable to achieve R0 resection or preservation of the anus; 2. Lateral lymph node dissection is required; 3. Patients with a history of severe mental illness, immune disorders, or those taking hormonal medications; 4. Any other circumstances in which the investigator deems it inappropriate for inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mesorectal incomplete rate2 weeks after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative conversion rateduring the surgeryDefined as the proportion of cases where laparoscopic total mesoresection (laTME) was converted to open total mesoresection (taTME), or where taTME was converted back to laTME, or where conversion occurred to an open surgical approach during the procedure.
Positive resection margin rate2 weeks after surgerydefined as the presence of cancer cells on the distal rectal resection margin

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 13, 2026