Skip to content

Reliability In Neurocognitive Telemedicine Screening (RING)

Reliability In Neurocognitive Telemedicine Screening (RING)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07760545
Enrollment
300
Registered
2026-08-12
Start date
2023-05-02
Completion date
2027-01-30
Last updated
2026-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Impairment, Cognitive Screening, Neurocognitive Function, Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders, Preoperative Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

Perioperative neurocognitive disorders, Cognitive impairment, Preoperative cognitive screening, Cognitive assessment, Mini-Cog, Modified Mini-Cog, Telephone-based cognitive screening, Telemedicine

Brief summary

Perioperative neurocognitive disorders are common after surgery and pre-existing cognitive impairment is an important risk factor. Current guidelines recommend identifying cognitive impairment before surgery; however, screening remains inconsistent, particularly when preoperative assessments are performed remotely. This prospective observational diagnostic validation study aims to determine whether a modified Mini-Cog cognitive screening tool administered by telephone can reliably identify cognitive impairment in patients aged 65 years and older undergoing preoperative assessment. Telephone-based modified Mini-Cog results will be compared with standard in-person Mini-Cog assessments to evaluate agreement and feasibility. This study may improve access to preoperative cognitive screening and support optimization of surgical care for older adults.

Detailed description

Perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) are common and associated with significant morbidity and economic costs. One of the dominant risk factors for PND is pre-existing cognitive impairment (CI). The importance of detecting CI pre-operatively to facilitate patient selection for optimisation pathways and informed risk assessments is stressed in recent joint guidelines by the American College of Surgeons and the American Geriatrics Society. Despite these recommendations, screening for pre-operative CI is inconsistently performed. One systematic barrier to CI screening is telemedicine, the use of which has recently seen an inflection point partly precipitated by the Coronavirus pandemic. Telemedicine enables the delivery of tertiary level patient-centred care over expanding geographical catchments, and is likely here to stay. To date, no brief CI screening tool has been validated for perioperative use via telemedicine. The Mini-Cog is a brief CI screening tool that is uniquely familiar to perioperative healthcare providers. It is validated in preoperative patients and performs favourably compared to other screening tools in the detection of CI. A Mini-Cog result consistent with CI is strongly associated with postoperative delirium, and is widely used as a trigger for geriatric optimization referral. Validation of the Mini-Cog delivered via telemedicine is an important step towards improving patient access to CI screening. Although video pre-operative assessments have been shown to promote high levels of patient and anesthesiologist satisfaction6, it is our local experience that video call technology is less frequently available to older patients, can pose operational challenges for either participant, and reduces workflow flexibility. Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is an integral part of the Mini-Cog, testing multiple domains of executive function and motor skills, and functioning as a 'distractor' between the registration and recall of three items. A modified Mini-Cog has been used with illiterate patients unable to use an analogue clock. The CDT was replaced with a serial subtraction task (SST) as an alternate distractor. One study found the modified Mini-Cog correlates with a proxy-rated CI screening tool similarly to the standard Mini-Cog. Whilst it not feasible to perform a Mini-Cog assessment during a telephone interview, the modified Mini-Cog is an attractive alternative. We therefore aim to validate the modified Mini-Cog assessment for use over the telephone. Our study involves comparing the validated Mini-Cog with the modified Mini-Cog. Patients awaiting surgery performed the Modified-Mini-Cog with telemedicine and on a later date subsequently performed the validated standard Mini-Cog. We plan to analyse the concordance of the results.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTModified Mini-Cog Telephone Assessment

A modified Mini-Cog cognitive screening assessment administered by telephone to evaluate its reliability and concordance with standard in-person Mini-Cog assessment in older adults undergoing preoperative assessment.

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER
Vancouver General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with age \>65 at time of listing for pre-operative assessment. 2. Patients with a conversational understanding of English language. 3. Patients scheduled for in-person consult with an anaesthesiologist. 4. Patients awaiting surgery at Vancouver General Hospital or University of British Columbia Hospital.

Exclusion criteria

1\. Patients with known cognitive impairment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concordance between telephone-administered modified Mini-Cog and standard in-person Mini-Cog assessmentWithin 1-2 weeks of telephone assessmentAgreement between modified Mini-Cog scores obtained by telephone and standard in-person Mini-Cog scores in identifying cognitive impairment using the established Mini-Cog cutoff score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity and specificity of telephone modified Mini-CogWithin 1-2 weeks of telephone assessmentSensitivity and specificity of the telephone-administered modified Mini-Cog for detection of cognitive impairment compared with the in-person Mini-Cog assessment.
Completion time of modified Mini-Cog assessmentDuring each assessmentTime required to complete the telephone and in-person Mini-Cog assessments.
Feasibility of telephone-based cognitive screeningDuring telephone assessmentProportion of participants able to complete the telephone-administered modified Mini-Cog assessment.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTDonald Young, MD
donald.young@vch.ca800-604-875-4304
CONTACTShirley Lim, BSN, BS-HRIM
shirley.lim@vch.ca604-875-4111
STUDY_DIRECTORStewart Brown, MD

University of British Columbia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 13, 2026