Skip to content

Oral Flap Outline and Local Blood Supply After Surgical Removal of Lower Third Molar Teeth

Influence of Two Mucoperiosteal Flap Outlines on Neighbouring-Tooth and Mucosal Microcirculation Following Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth: A Laser Doppler Flowmetry Investigation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07758192
Enrollment
56
Registered
2026-08-11
Start date
2020-11-09
Completion date
2021-11-09
Last updated
2026-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Molar, Third, Oral Surgical Procedures, Regional Blood Flow, Surgical Flaps, Tooth, Impacted

Keywords

mouth opening, swelling, mucosal perfusion, pulp circulation, laser Doppler flowmetry, vertical releasing incision, mucoperiosteal flap, impacted wisdom tooth

Brief summary

Wisdom teeth in the lower jaw are frequently buried in bone and must be taken out surgically. To reach the tooth, the surgeon lifts the gum away from the bone as a flap, and the shape of that flap is left to the surgeon's judgement. Two outlines are in everyday use. The first runs only along the necks of the teeth, so the gum is lifted without any additional cut. The second adds a short downward cut in front, which opens the field more widely but also divides some of the small vessels that run within the gum. Because the tissues around a wound rely on a rich network of tiny vessels while they repair themselves, it is worth knowing whether these two outlines leave the local circulation in a different state. This project measured that circulation directly. A laser probe was placed against the tooth in front of the extraction site and against three points on the cheek-side gum, and the amount of moving blood beneath the probe was recorded. To make sure the probe returned to exactly the same spots at every visit, a thin clear plastic guide with prepared openings was made for each participant from a plaster model of the mouth. Measurements were taken before the operation and again on the third and the seventh day afterwards. Facial swelling and how widely the mouth could be opened were recorded on the same occasions. Participants were assigned to one of the two flap outlines in turn, and every operation was carried out by the same surgeon so that the comparison depended on the flap outline alone.

Detailed description

Fifty-six systemically healthy adults presenting for surgical removal of a single fully bone-impacted mandibular wisdom tooth were assigned to one of two mucoperiosteal flap outlines by an alternating (non-random) sequence, giving twenty-eight participants per arm. Assignment was stratified by angulation according to Winter's scheme, so that each of the four angulation categories contributed seven cases to each arm. Microvascular perfusion was quantified in perfusion units using a laser Doppler flowmeter (Perimed, Järfälla, Sweden). One recording site lay on the mid-buccal aspect of the tooth immediately anterior to the extraction site, at the crossing of its mesiodistal and occlusocervical axes, and served as an index of pulp circulation; three further sites were distributed over the adjacent buccal mucosa. Probe position was reproduced across visits by a 2 mm transparent acrylic stent carrying prepared probe housings, constructed individually on a stone model. Each site was sampled for 30 seconds. Swelling was derived from three facial reference distances (gonion to labial commissure, tragus to labial commissure, and gonion to lateral canthus), averaged to a single value. Mouth opening was taken as the greatest interincisal distance. Every assessment was carried out immediately before surgery and repeated on the third and seventh postoperative days, sutures being removed at the final visit. All operations were performed by one operator with a standard armamentarium under inferior alveolar, lingual and buccal block anaesthesia, using no more than two cartridges of articaine 40 mg/mL with epinephrine 1:100,000. Bone was removed and the tooth divided with a physiodispenser and steel burs under saline cooling, and the socket was closed with 3/0 silk. All participants received amoxicillin-clavulanate, paracetamol and a benzydamine-chlorhexidine mouthrinse after the procedure. Group means were compared by repeated-measures analysis of variance with Tukey HSD pairwise testing.

Interventions

PROCEDURESulcular flap elevation for wisdom tooth removal

The mucoperiosteum is raised through an incision confined to the gingival sulcus, carried from the mesial aspect of the first molar back to the distal aspect of the second molar and then along the external oblique ridge.

PROCEDUREThree-cornered flap elevation for wisdom tooth removal

The same sulcular and posterior incision is used, with the addition of a vertical relieving cut placed anterior to the second molar and kept clear of the interdental papilla

Sponsors

Betül Taş Özyurtseven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Free of systemic illness and taking no regular medication * Aged 18 to 40 years * One fully bone-impacted mandibular wisdom tooth for which surgical removal is indicated * Ramus relationship of class II or III and depth position A, B or C on the Pell and Gregory scheme * Angulation falling into one of four categories on Winter's scheme: vertical, mesioangular, horizontal or distoangular * Neighbouring second molar intact, i.e. without extensive caries, endodontic treatment, a large filling or a crown * Willing and able to give written consent and to attend both follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

* Any systemic disorder, or use of medication on a continuing basis * Tobacco use * Previous irradiation or chemotherapy involving the head and neck * Infection within the mouth at the time of surgery, including acute pericoronitis * Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy * Menstruation at the time of a scheduled measurement * Need for more than two anaesthetic cartridges to achieve profound anaesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in mucosal microcirculation adjacent to the operative fieldImmediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7Perfusion in perfusion units (PU) at three buccal mucosal sites recorded by laser Doppler flowmetry through the same stabilising stent, 30 seconds per site. The most anterior site lies in the region traversed by the vertical relieving cut of the three-cornered outline.
Change in pulp microcirculation of the tooth adjacent to the extraction siteImmediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7Perfusion recorded in perfusion units (PU) by laser Doppler flowmetry over the mid-buccal aspect of the neighbouring second molar, with probe position reproduced by an individually made acrylic stent. Each recording lasts 30 seconds. A higher value indicates greater circulation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in facial swellingImmediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7Mean of three facial reference distances measured in centimetres: gonion to labial commissure, tragus to labial commissure, and gonion to lateral canthus. A higher value indicates more swelling.
Change in maximum mouth openingImmediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7Greatest interincisal distance in millimetres, used as an index of restricted opening. A lower value indicates greater restriction.
Duration of the operationDay of surgery (day 0), intraoperativeElapsed time in minutes from the first cut to placement of the final suture.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBetül Taş Özyurtseven, DDS, PhD, Assoc. Prof. Dr.

University of Gaziantep

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 12, 2026