Skip to content

Effect of Somatosensory Motor Control With and Without Kinesio Tape in Patients With Sciatica

Effects of Somatosensory Motor Control With and Without Kinesio Tape on Pain, Range of Motion of Lumbar, Dynamic Balance and Function Disability in Patients With Sciatica

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07756905
Enrollment
58
Registered
2026-08-11
Start date
2025-06-01
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2026-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sciatica

Keywords

Pain, Lumbar Range of Motion, Dynamic Balance, Functional Disability

Brief summary

Sciatica can be defined as a radicular pain that runs through the sciatic nerve from the lower back to the lower limbs and also may be associated with weakness or numbness in the muscles. These symptoms may affect proprioception, dynamic balance and functional mobility, which result in limitations of activity and disability. Training to improve somatosensory motor control has been shown to be effective in improving coordination and postural stability and Kinesio taping has the potential to increase proprioceptive input, decrease pain and aid functional recovery.

Detailed description

To evaluate the additional effects of kinesio taping when added to somatosensory motor control training on pain, active range of motion of the lumbar spine, proprioceptive related postural control, dynamic balance and functional disability in people with discogenic sciatica. The study was an accessor-blinded randomized controlled trial approved by the ethical council of Riphah College of Rehabilitation & Allied Health Sciences and was carried out for 11 months in 4 hospitals at Sialkot. 58 Participants were randomized; among which 54 participants completed the intervention and were included in per-protocol analysis with 27 participants in each group. During the 6-week intervention period, Group A was administered with somatosensory motor control training, conventional therapy, and Kinesio taping; while Group B was administered with the same intervention with the exception of Kinesio taping. The following outcome measures were used: Visual Analog Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Modified Schober Test, Y-Balance Test, Romberg Test, and Tandem Stand Test. Data was analyzed in SPSS version 25 with statistical significance being considered as p\<0.05.

Interventions

OTHERsomatosensory motor control exercises, Kinesiology taping, and conventional Treatment

Total Time per Session: 45-60 minutes Frequency: 3 sessions per week Total Duration: 6 weeks Assessment Points: Pre-treatment (Baseline) Post-treatment (End of 6th week)

OTHERsomatosensory motor control and conventional Treatment

Total Time per Session: 45-60 minutes Frequency: 3 sessions per week Total Duration: 6 weeks Assessment Points: Pre-treatment (Baseline) Post-treatment (End of 6th week)

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

An independent assessor, who is blinded to the group allocations, will be responsible for evaluating outcomes, including pain, range of motion of lumbar, dynamic balance and function disability in patients with sciatica.

Intervention model description

Randomised Clinical Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
35 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Both male and females. * Age between 35-50 years. * Discogenic pain due to Diagnosed herniation lumbar disc L4/L5 and L5/S1 (confirmed by MRI). * unilateral leg pain radiating below the knee accompanied by numbness, tingling, or weakness in the affected leg. * Pain persists between 3-6 months. * Positive Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test between 40° to 70°, suggestive of neural irritation.

Exclusion criteria

* • Patients with inflammatory diseases like ankylosing spondylitis, vertebral collapse, rheumatoid arthritis, stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or osteoporosis. * Recent spinal surgery * Abdominal or lower limb surgery * Pregnancy * Skin allergies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue ScaleBaseline and post 6 weeksThe Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is scored by measuring the distance in millimeters (from 0 to 100 mm) or centimeters (0 to 10 cm) on a straight line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark. Higher numbers mean more intense symptoms.
lumbar range of motionBaseline and post 6 weeksModified Schober Test, The Schober Test evaluates lower back movement. Scoring is based on how much the distance between marked points on the spine increases during forward bending. A starting 15 cm span should stretch to 20 cm or more; an increase under 5 cm shows reduced flexibility
dynamic balanceBaseline and post 6 weeksY balance test, The Y Balance Test is a standardized three-direction reach test (anterior, posteromedial, posterolateral) used to assess dynamic balance, limb asymmetry, and injury risk, with anterior reach asymmetry \>4 cm and composite scores below \~89-94% linked to higher injury risk.
functional disabilityBaseline and post 6 weeksOswestry Disability Index (ODI), The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a 10-item patient questionnaire scored from 0 to 5 per question. Total the points, divide by the maximum possible score (usually 50, or 5 × questions answered), and multiply by 100 to get a percentage score from 0% to 100%. You can calculate scores interactively using tools like OrthoToolKit.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAiza Yousaf, MSOMPT

Riphah International University

CONTACTImran Amjad, PhD
imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk03324390125

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 12, 2026