Skip to content

Comparison of Two Phacoemulsification Systems in Cataract Surgery (UNITY VCS vs. Centurion)

Comparison of Ultrasound Efficiency and Early Postoperative Outcomes of Two Phacoemulsification Systems (UNITY VCS 4D Phaco and Centurion With Active Sentry Probe): A Randomized Contralateral Eye Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07756385
Acronym
COMPASS
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-08-10
Start date
2026-08-06
Completion date
2026-10-29
Last updated
2026-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract Surgery

Keywords

Phacoemulsification, UNITY VCS System 4D Phaco, Centurion Vision System with Active Sentry Handpiece, Contralateral eye study

Brief summary

This prospective, randomized, contralateral (crossover) study compares the ultrasound efficiency and early postoperative outcomes (Day 1 and Day 7) of two phacoemulsification platforms - the UNITY® VCS system with 4D Phaco and the Centurion® Vision System with ACTIVE SENTRY® Handpiece - used in the two eyes of the same patient undergoing cataract surgery.

Detailed description

Adult patients scheduled for uncomplicated phacoemulsification with comparable cataract density between eyes (within one LOCS III grade) will have one eye randomized to the UNITY VCS system and the contralateral eye to the Centurion Vision System, with the same surgeon and using the same low IOP fluidics parameters. The contralateral eye surgery will be performed two weeks after the first eye surgery. The study will evaluate ultrasound efficiency using machine-recorded parameters, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central corneal thickness (CCT) on postoperative Days 1 and 7.

Interventions

DEVICEUNITY VCS SYSTEM ®

4D PHACO PROBE

DEVICECENTURION VISION SYSTEM ®

ACTIVE SENTRY PROBE

Sponsors

University Hospital Sveti Duh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients scheduled for uncomplicated phacoemulsification with comparable cataract density between eyes (within one LOCS III grade)

Exclusion criteria

* Prior corneal or intraocular surgery * Significant corneal pathology * Significant asymmetry between eyes in: cataract density, astigmatism, or axial length

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ultrasound efficiency evaluated through Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) required to remove the cataractIntraoperative

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ultrasound efficiency evaluated through Ultrasound (U/S) Total TimeIntraoperative
Ultrasound efficiency evaluated through Total Aspiration TimeIntraoperative
Ultrasound efficiency evaluated through Estimated Fluid AspiratedIntraoperative
Ultrasound efficiency evaluated through Total Case TimeIntraoperative
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)Postoperative Day 1 and Day 7
Central corneal thickness (CCT)Postoperative Day 1 and Day 7

Countries

Croatia

Contacts

CONTACTProf. Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer, M.D., Ph.D.
belabjer@kbsd.hr+385912209555
CONTACTIva Ćubela, M.D.
icubela@kbsd.hr+385912223220

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 11, 2026