Skip to content

Ba-Duan-Jin Training Versus NASM Approach

Comparative Effects of Ba Duan Jin Training and NASM Approach on Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07756099
Enrollment
42
Registered
2026-08-10
Start date
2025-03-20
Completion date
2025-09-15
Last updated
2026-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy

Keywords

Ba-Duan-Jin training, Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy, Disability, NASM Approach, Pain, Range of Motion

Brief summary

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) is now becoming one of the most common public health concerns in the world. The objective of the current study is to compare the effects of Ba Duan Jin with the National Academy of Sports Medicine-based exercise protocol on pain, range of motion, and disability in patients with CSR. The study was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial, was conducted in the Physiotherapy departments of Arif Memorial Teaching Hospital, Hameed Latif Hospital, and Shalamar Hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. Two groups of (no of) patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, aged 20-55, were formed through random allocation: Group A received routine physical therapy + Ba Duan Jin, while Group B received routine physical therapy + NASM-based exercises, with three sessions per week for 6 weeks. To evaluate the treatment protocols' long-term effects, data were gathered at baseline and at 6-week follow-ups. The study employed three outcome measures: Numeric Pain Rating scale (pain), Neck Disability index (disability), and Goniometer (cervical range of motion). Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25. Results of present study showed that after 6-weeks of NASM approach to group B with value of 2.00 for pain and 4.00 for disability, there was a significantly great pain and disability reduction, by assessing with NPRS and NDI with value of compared to group A with value of with value of 3.00 for pain and 12.00 for disability. While both interventions yielded comparable improvements in range of motion among CSR patients. Both Ba Duan Jin and NASM approaches demonstrated efficacy, with the NASM approach showing more pronounced benefits in pain and disability reduction, whereas both interventions had similar effects on range of motion among patients.

Interventions

OTHERBa-Duan-Jin Training

Ba Duan Jin Training along with Baseline treatment.

OTHERNASM Approach

National Academy of Sports Medicine Approach along with Baseline treatment.

Sponsors

Rashid Latif Medical College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy (CSR)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with cardiovascular disease, Mental Disorders, Malignancies, Musculoskeletal Rheumatic, neurological disorders, skin and peripheral vascular disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numerical Pain Rating ScalePre and post 6 weeksPain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), a self-reported measure ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "the worst pain". Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity and therefore a worse outcome.
GoniometerPre and post 6 weeks.It is used to assess range of motion.
Neck Disability IndexPre and Post 6 weeksNeck disability was assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 10 items, with total scores ranging from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater neck-related disability and therefore a worse outcome.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMuniba Khan

Arif Memorial Teaching Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 14, 2026