Skip to content

Basic Trauma Training Programme for Newly Graduated Nurses in Saudi Trauma Centres

Evaluating the Basic Trauma Training (BTT) Programme on Workforce Sustainability Among Newly Graduated Nurses in Saudi Level One Trauma Centres: Protocol for a Two-Site, Non-Equivalent Comparison-Group Quasi-Experimental Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07754903
Acronym
BTTS
Enrollment
128
Registered
2026-08-10
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2027-01-31
Last updated
2026-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burnout, Professional, Job Satisfaction, Nurse Retention, Transition to Practice, Professional

Keywords

newly graduated nurses, trauma nursing, workforce sustainability, transition shock, job demands-resources model, Saudi Arabia, quasi-experimental

Brief summary

New nurses often find it difficult to adjust when they start working in fast-paced, high-pressure trauma units, and many leave their jobs within the first two years. This study looks at whether a two-day training programme, called Basic Trauma Training (BTT), helps newly graduated nurses in Saudi trauma hospitals feel more confident, satisfied and engaged in their work, and more likely to stay in the nursing profession. The study takes place at two trauma hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Because it is not practical to randomly assign nurses to groups in this real-world hospital setting, the study compares an earlier group of new nurses, who receive standard hospital orientation only, with a later group, who receive standard orientation plus the two-day BTT training. Both groups complete questionnaires before and after their orientation or training period, answering questions about job satisfaction, engagement, stress and their plans to stay in the role. The study also looks at actual staff retention using hospital employment records at 6 and 12 months. Nurses in the comparison group are offered the BTT training later, once their part of the study is complete, so that everyone has the chance to take part in the training.

Detailed description

This is a two-site, non-equivalent comparison-group quasi-experimental study using a pre-test/post-test design. Allocation is non-random and determined by intake cohort within each participating site: an earlier intake of eligible newly graduated nurses forms the comparator group, and a subsequent intake forms the intervention group, so that study arm is not confounded with site. The intervention, Basic Trauma Training (BTT), is a structured two-day (14 contact-hour) educational programme developed in alignment with Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) Specialised Professional Programme accreditation standards. It comprises five modules: trauma systems and primary survey principles; advanced trauma assessment and clinical reasoning; critical trauma interventions and patient safety; interprofessional communication and team leadership; and psychological preparedness, peer support and self-care. Delivery combines didactic teaching, high-fidelity simulation using the PEARLS debriefing framework, and facilitated reflective discussion. The comparator condition is standard institutional orientation (approximately five days of general clinical induction without trauma-specific structured training). Comparator-arm participants are offered BTT, with the same continuing professional development credit, after their follow-up assessment (waitlist design). Individual-level randomisation was not adopted due to contamination risk between nurses working on the same unit, and because staffing and rostering decisions are governed by institutional service demand rather than research allocation. Contamination is managed through scheduling separation, controlled distribution of training materials, and a two-item contamination check at follow-up. The primary outcome is workforce sustainability, a formative composite index of four equally weighted, standardised components: job satisfaction (MOAQ-JSS), work engagement (UWES-9), personal burnout (CBI-PB, reverse scored), and retention intention. The primary analysis is a linear mixed-effects model with a time-by-arm interaction term, adjusting for site, prior trauma exposure, months since graduation, and delivery block. Secondary outcomes include the four composite components analysed individually, role transition stress (Rizzo Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict scales), trauma-care self-efficacy, general self-efficacy (GSE-10), and actual workforce retention from institutional HR records at 6 and 12 months. An exploratory mediation analysis examines whether role transition stress and self-efficacy mediate the effect of BTT on workforce sustainability. The study is reported in accordance with the SPIRIT 2025 statement for trial protocols and the TREND statement for non-randomised intervention evaluations, with intervention reporting following the TIDieR checklist.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBasic Trauma Training (BTT) Programme

A structured two-day, 14-contact-hour educational programme comprising five modules: trauma systems and primary survey principles; advanced trauma assessment and clinical reasoning; critical trauma interventions and patient safety; interprofessional communication and team leadership; and psychological preparedness, peer support and self-care. Delivered via didactic teaching, high-fidelity simulation using the PEARLS debriefing framework, and facilitated reflective discussion.

OTHERStandard Institutional Orientation

Standard existing onboarding programme for newly employed nursing staff, comprising approximately five days of general clinical induction without trauma-specific structured training. Content and duration are documented at baseline to characterise the comparator condition precisely.

Sponsors

Lincoln University College
Lead SponsorOTHER
King Saud Medical City
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Lincoln University College Malaysia
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Data management and statistical analysis are conducted with arm labels masked to the analysis team until primary models have been fitted, to reduce analytic bias despite the inability to mask participants or facilitators to the intervention itself.

Intervention model description

Two-site, non-equivalent comparison-group quasi-experimental design. Allocation is by successive intake cohort within each site rather than by randomisation, so that study arm is not confounded with site; both participating sites contribute nurses to both the comparator and intervention arms.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) licensure * Less than 12 months of post-licensure clinical experience at baseline * Current direct patient-facing employment in a trauma-related intensive care unit at King Saud Medical City or Northern Medical Tower * Willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* More than 12 months of post-licensure clinical experience * Employment outside trauma-related ICU settings * Agency or temporary staffing status * Extended leave during the intervention or data-collection period * Prior formal trauma-specific training (ATCN, TNCC) before enrolment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Workforce Sustainability (Composite Index)Baseline (T0) and 4-6 weeks post-intervention/orientation (T1)A formative composite index of four equally weighted, standardised (z-score) components: job satisfaction (Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale, MOAQ-JSS, 3 items, 7-point Likert), work engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, UWES-9, 0-6 frequency scale), personal burnout (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory, CBI-PB, 6 items, 0-100 scale, reverse scored), and retention intention (validated instrument, to be finalised). Each component is standardised using the pooled baseline mean and SD across both arms at T0, and the four standardised components are averaged.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Job SatisfactionBaseline (T0) and 4-6 weeks post-intervention/orientation (T1)Measured using the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale (MOAQ-JSS, 3 items, 7-point Likert scale)

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Contacts

CONTACTAbdulaziz Sultan L. Alanazi
sultan.phdscholar@lincoln.edu.my+966 53 113 0431
CONTACTFaridah Mohd Said Dr.
faridah.msaid@lincoln.edu.my+60122200419
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAbdulaziz L Alanazi

Lincoln University College

STUDY_DIRECTORFaridah M Said

Lincoln University College

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 12, 2026