Skip to content

Early Complications After Flow Diverter Versus Stent-Assisted Coiling for Unruptured Wide-Neck Intracranial Bifurcation Aneurysms

Early Complications After Flow Diverter Versus Stent-Assisted Coiling for Unruptured Wide-Neck Intracranial Bifurcation Aneurysms: A Prospective Real-World Cohort Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07754188
Acronym
FD-SAC BAS
Enrollment
274
Registered
2026-08-10
Start date
2026-03-19
Completion date
2028-03-19
Last updated
2026-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intracranial Bifurcation Aneurysm, Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm, Wide-Neck Aneurysm

Keywords

Intracranial bifurcation aneurysm, Wide-neck aneurysm, Flow diverter, Stent-assisted coiling, Endovascular treatment, Early complications, Stroke, All-cause mortality, Real-world study, Prospective cohort

Brief summary

This prospective real-world cohort study aims to compare early postoperative complications between flow diverter treatment and stent-assisted coiling in patients with unruptured wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. A total of 274 patients from three centers in China will be enrolled and assigned to the flow diverter group or the stent-assisted coiling group according to the treatment received in routine clinical practice. The primary outcome is a composite of any stroke or all-cause death within 30 days after the procedure. The study will also collect demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, aneurysm morphological, procedural, and follow-up data to evaluate the safety of these two endovascular treatment strategies in a real-world setting.

Detailed description

Intracranial bifurcation aneurysms are common and are challenging to treat because of their complex anatomy. Flow diverters have emerged as an innovative endovascular therapy and have shown preliminary efficacy in bifurcation aneurysms. However, compared with conventional stent-assisted coiling, real-world evidence regarding early postoperative complication risks and related influencing factors remains limited. This study will establish a prospective multicenter real-world database to compare the incidence of early complications after treatment with a flow diverter versus stent-assisted coiling in patients with unruptured wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. Eligible patients who provide informed consent and meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled from three centers in China. Patients treated with a flow diverter will enter the flow diverter group, and patients treated with stent-assisted coiling will enter the stent-assisted coiling group. All patients will undergo preoperative evaluation, perioperative management, postoperative antiplatelet therapy, and follow-up according to clinical practice and relevant guidelines. Data collected will include demographic characteristics, medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, imaging findings, aneurysm morphology, procedural details, device information, medication history, and adverse events. Follow-up will be performed at 30 days after treatment to assess safety outcomes.

Interventions

Flow diverter treatment will be performed according to routine clinical practice and relevant guidelines. A flow-diverting stent will be deployed to cover the aneurysm neck after angiographic evaluation and device sizing. Perioperative management and antiplatelet therapy will be performed according to the study protocol and clinical practice.

Stent-assisted coiling will be performed according to routine clinical practice and relevant guidelines. A stent will be deployed across the aneurysm neck, followed by coil embolization of the aneurysm. Perioperative management and antiplatelet therapy will be performed according to the study protocol and clinical practice.

Sponsors

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Zhujiang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangdong Province People's Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Voluntarily provides written informed consent. * Aged 18 to 75 years. * Diagnosed by CTA, MRA, or DSA as having an unruptured, bifurcation, saccular, wide-neck intracranial aneurysm. * Able to understand the purpose of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with two or more multiple aneurysms, all of which require treatment within 1 year. * Patients with other cerebrovascular diseases such as arteriovenous malformation or moyamoya disease. * Patients with ruptured aneurysms or narrow-neck aneurysms. * Patients who experienced stroke, including cerebral hemorrhage or cerebral infarction, within the past 1 month. * Patients with poor clinical condition, defined as modified Rankin Scale score ≥3. * Patients who have already planned to undergo surgical or interventional treatment within 3 months. * Patients considered by the investigator to be unsuitable for endovascular treatment, such as those with no suitable vascular access, excessively tortuous vessels, or difficulty in stent delivery. * Patients unsuitable for anesthesia or endovascular treatment, including those with major heart, lung, liver, spleen, or kidney disease, brain tumor, severe active infection, disseminated intravascular coagulation, or a history of severe psychiatric disorder. * Patients unable to receive antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. * Patients with a previous or possible severe reaction to contrast agents that would prevent completion of pre-treatment medication or treatment. * Patients with a known history of allergy to cobalt-chromium or nickel-titanium alloy materials. * Patients who participated in another drug or medical device clinical trial before enrollment and have not reached the time point of the primary endpoint. * Pregnant or lactating women. * Patients with life expectancy less than 12 months. * Patients judged by the investigator to have poor compliance and inability to complete the study as required

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Composite incidence of any stroke or all-cause death within 30 days after procedureWithin 30 days after procedureThe primary outcome is the occurrence of any stroke or all-cause death within 30 days after the endovascular procedure. Stroke is defined as an acute onset of focal or global neurological dysfunction caused by vascular injury of the brain, spinal cord, or retina due to hemorrhage or infarction, with symptoms lasting 24 hours or longer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of any stroke within 30 days after procedureWithin 30 days after procedureIncidence of any ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 30 days after the procedure.
Incidence of transient ischemic attack within 30 days after procedureWithin 30 days after procedureIncidence of transient ischemic attack within 30 days after the procedure. Transient ischemic attack is defined as a transient episode of focal neurological dysfunction caused by ischemia of the brain, spinal cord, or retina, with symptoms lasting less than 24 hours and without acute infarction.
Incidence of all-cause death within 30 days after procedureWithin 30 days after procedureIncidence of death from any cause within 30 days after the procedure.
Incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events within 30 days after procedureWithin 30 days after procedureIncidence of adverse events and serious adverse events recorded during the perioperative period and follow-up period.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTHuibin Kang Study Contact, MD
kanghuibindoctor@163.com13520296286
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORWenfeng Feng, MD

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 11, 2026