Diabetic Macular Edema
Conditions
Keywords
diabetic macular oedema, treat and extend, faricimab, south asian, indian, pakistani, bangladeshi, sri lankan
Brief summary
The YOSEMITE and RHINE trials, which studied DMO treated with faricimab, had a majority Caucasian cohort, and the small Asian cohort was East Asian, with no South Asian representation. South Asians have a much higher prevalence of diabetes and its ophthalmic complication of DMO. The SEAFAR study is designed to address this unmet need by specifically evaluating faricimab in a UK-based South Asian cohort with diabetic macular oedema (DMO), delivered via a pragmatic treat-and-extend regimen, for clinically meaningful visual acuity gains, durable anatomic control of DMO, and an acceptable safety profile at week 88 in South Asian patients, with interim benefits by week 52.
Detailed description
Diabetic macular oedema (DMO), characterised by accumulation of extracellular fluid in the macula due to breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier, is the most common cause of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. It affects approximately one in fifteen people with diabetes, corresponding to more than 20 million individuals worldwide, and is a leading cause of vision impairment. The risk of diabetes is not equally distributed across populations. In the UK, individuals of South Asian heritage (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan) have a 2-4 times higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to those of European ancestry, with onset often at a younger age and at lower body mass index (BMI) thresholds. They are also shown to have a higher prevalence of retinopathy and maculopathy compared with White Europeans, with worse systemic risk factors (such as HbA1c, blood pressure, cholesterol). Despite this, there is limited trial-based evidence addressing treatment outcomes for these high-risk groups. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has transformed the management of DMO. Pivotal trials such as RISE/RIDE and VIVID/VISTA established the efficacy of ranibizumab and aflibercept in improving visual outcomes and reducing retinal thickness. More recently, faricimab, a bispecific antibody targeting VEGF-A and Angiopoietin-2, has demonstrated efficacy with the potential for extended durability. In the YOSEMITE and RHINE trials, faricimab provided comparable or superior visual and anatomical outcomes to aflibercept 2mg, with a substantial proportion of patients achieving treatment intervals of up to every 16 weeks. While YOSEMITE and RHINE enrolled over 1,800 patients, the majority of them were non-Asian (n=1747 versus n=144 for Asians). Subgroup analyses for participants in YOSEMITE and RHINE from Asian countries demonstrated broadly similar outcomes between Asian and non-Asian groups. However, the Asian participants were predominantly from East Asia (China, Japan, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan), which means that these findings cannot be extrapolated to South Asian patients given their potentially distinct genetic, biological, and lifestyle risk profiles. Notably, the ELEVATUM trial, designed to evaluate faricimab in underrepresented groups (African-Caribbean, Hispanic, Pacific Islander), similarly did not include adequate representation of South Asians. Thus, a critical evidence gap remains. The SEAFAR study is designed to address this unmet need by specifically evaluating faricimab in a UK-based South Asian cohort with DMO. The rationale is threefold: 1. Scientific need: Ethnic differences in disease prevalence, risk factor profiles and possibly treatment response necessitate focused evaluation. Biological differences in angiogenic pathways and systemic disease burden may influence treatment durability and safety. 2. Clinical relevance: In the 2021 Census data by the UK government, 5.5 million people in England and Wales were from Asian ethnic groups - 1.9 million of these identified with the Indian ethnic group, with 1.6 million from the Pakistani ethnic group. 3. Health system impact: If faricimab demonstrates similar or greater durability in South Asians, this could substantially reduce injection frequency and clinic visits. This is particularly relevant in communities with higher disease burden and in a National Health Service (NHS) setting where service capacity is constrained. A pragmatic, Phase IV, single-arm, open-label design is chosen to mirror routine clinical practice while still enabling comparison with previous trial data. By adopting a treat-and-extend protocol up to 24-week intervals, this study will generate real-world, ethnically relevant evidence on the efficacy, durability and safety of faricimab in South Asian patients with DMO. HYPOTHESIS AND OBJECTIVES Faricimab, delivered via a pragmatic treat-and-extend regimen, will produce clinically meaningful visual acuity gains, durable anatomic control of DMO, and an acceptable safety profile at week 88 in South Asian patients, with interim benefits by week 52. All participants will have a forced study visit at Week 52 and Week 88 (exit visit) even if not aligned with their treatment interval. Primary objective: 1\) To evaluate the change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity at week 88 (+/- 14 days) in the study eye, with best responsive patients completing a 24-week extension of their active dosing phase and initiating their observation phase. Secondary objectives: 1. Durability: Distribution of maximum dosing interval achieved and the proportion of participants at each interval (Q8W, Q12W, Q16W, Q20W, Q24W). 2. Anatomy: Change in central subfield thickness (CST) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and proportions with absence of DMO (below device-specific inclusion threshold) and absence of intraretinal fluid. 3. Visual acuity categories: Proportions gaining/losing \>=5, \>=10, \>=15 letters. 4. Vision-related quality of life: Change from baseline in VFQ-25/EQ-5D. 5. Diabetic retinopathy severity score (DRSS): 1. Proportion with a 2 step improvement from baseline 2. Proportion with a 3 step improvement from baseline 6. Safety: Ocular/systemic adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE), Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions (SUSARs) from baseline through Week 88. EXPECTED RISKS AND BENEFITS Risks: Participants will experience no study-specific risks. Clinical risks as per standard of care include: * Participants may be exposed to risks related to both the intravitreal injection procedure and the study drug, faricimab. Injection-related risks include endophthalmitis, retinal detachment or tear, vitreous haemorrhage, transient or sustained rise in intraocular pressure, cataract progression, subconjunctival haemorrhage, and ocular discomfort. * Drug-related risks include intraocular inflammation, retinal vasculitis, vascular occlusion, and very rare systemic arterial thromboembolic events such as stroke or myocardial infarction, which are recognised class effects of anti-VEGF therapy. For identified risks for faricimab, please see the Vabysmo 120 mg/mL Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). * In addition, participants may experience inconvenience, anxiety, or discomfort associated with repeated clinic visits, ophthalmic imaging, and intravitreal procedures. Benefits: Wider benefits to society and healthcare include the generation of population-specific evidence for the efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab in South Asian patients with DMO, who have historically been underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials. This may support equitable access to evidence-based care and inform NHS service planning by demonstrating whether extended dosing intervals can reduce treatment burden and service demand.
Interventions
Intravitreal anti-VEGF injection, Faricimab
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* All subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to participate: 1. Patients who self-identify themselves as of South Asian origin. Including Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and Sri Lankan. 2. Adults aged ≥18 years at time of consent. 3. Documented diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. 4. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20-73 ETDRS letters, corresponding approximately to 6/12 to 6/120 Snellen (metres) in the study eye. 5. Centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO) confirmed on SD-OCT, with a central subfield thickness (CST) ≥400 µm, in line with UK NICE guidance in the treatment naïve patients (75% of the cohort). 25% of cohort is previously treated DMO where treatment commenced within 3 years of the screening visit and responded to the anti VEGF, reviewed during this period and developed any clinically significant recurrence of DMO, with vision at least 6/18 or better in the enrolled eye. 6. Decreased visual acuity attributable primarily to DMO. 7. Both eyes may be eligible; however, the eye with the higher CST will be designated as the study eye. 8. Male or female participants are eligible. Women of childbearing potential must agree to remain abstinent or use highly effective contraception during the study and for at least 3 months after the final dose. 9. Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and comply with all study procedures and follow-up.
Exclusion criteria
All subjects meeting any of the following
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in the Study Eye | Baseline and Week 88 (+/- 14 days) | Change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity in the study eye, measured as ETDRS letter score. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution of Maximum Dosing Interval Achieved | Baseline through Week 88 (+/- 14 days), with interim assessment at Week 52 (+/- 14 days) | Proportion of participants at each maximum dosing interval achieved (Q8W, Q12W, Q16W, Q20W, Q24W). |
| Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) | Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days) | Change from baseline in central subfield thickness measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. |
| Proportion of Participants With Absence of Diabetic Macular Oedema | Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days) | Proportion of participants with central subfield thickness below the device-specific inclusion threshold. |
| Proportion of Participants With Absence of Intraretinal Fluid | Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days) | Proportion of participants with absence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (Heidelberg SD-OCT), based on qualitative fluid status assessment. |
| Proportion of Participants Gaining >=5, >=10 and >=15 ETDRS Letters From Baseline | Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days) | Proportion of participants gaining 5 or more, 10 or more, and 15 or more letters from baseline in best corrected visual acuity, assessed using ETDRS charts. |
| Proportion of Participants Losing >=5, >=10 and >=15 ETDRS Letters From Baseline | Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days) | Proportion of participants losing 5 or more, 10 or more, and 15 or more letters from baseline in best corrected visual acuity, assessed using ETDRS charts. |
| Change From Baseline in Vision-Related Quality of Life (NEI VFQ-25) | Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days) | Change from baseline in vision-related quality of life, assessed using the VFQ-25 questionnaire, collected on paper or electronically depending on site capability. |
| Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D) | Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days) | Change from baseline in health-related quality of life, assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire, collected on paper or electronically depending on site capability. |
| Proportion of Participants With a 2-Step or 3-Step Improvement in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score (DRSS) From Baseline | Baseline, Week 52 (+/- 14 days) and Week 88 (+/- 14 days) | Proportion of participants with a 2-step or 3-step improvement from baseline in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score, documented in both eyes from wide-field fundus photographs. |
| Number of Participants With Ocular Adverse Events | Baseline through Week 88 (+/- 14 days), with interim assessment at Week 52 (+/- 14 days) | Number of participants with ocular adverse events. Adverse events will be coded and summarised by frequency, severity, and relationship to treatment. Ocular safety outcomes, including intraocular pressure and events such as endophthalmitis, retinal vasculitis, and retinal vascular occlusion, will be tabulated separately. |
| Number of Participants With Systemic Adverse Events | Baseline through Week 88 (+/- 14 days), with interim assessment at Week 52 (+/- 14 days) | Number of participants with systemic adverse events. Adverse events will be coded and summarised by frequency, severity, and relationship to treatment. |
| Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Baseline through Week 88 (+/- 14 days), with interim assessment at Week 52 (+/- 14 days) | Number of participants with serious adverse events, defined per protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Events will be coded and summarised by frequency, severity, and relationship to treatment. |
| Number of Participants With Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions (SUSARs) | Baseline through Week 88 (+/- 14 days), with interim assessment at Week 52 (+/- 14 days) | Number of participants with Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions, defined as adverse reactions that are both unexpected and serious. |
Contacts
Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre SWBH