Skip to content

Graftless Lateral Sinus Lifting Using Peizo Electric Device in Patients With Atrophic Maxilla

Guided Versus Conventional Graftless Lateral Sinus Lifting Using Peizo Electric Device in Patients With Atrophic Maxilla [a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial]

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07753057
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-08-07
Start date
2024-07-02
Completion date
2026-02-12
Last updated
2026-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sinus Lifting

Brief summary

Background: Dental implant therapy in the posterior maxilla may be difficult owing to limited bone height after dental extraction with sinus pneumatization. Several approaches for sinus floor elevation have been documented, and hence lateral sinus lifting using surgical guide is used. Aim of the study: To compare between guided and conventional sinus lifting using piezoelectric device in patients with atrophic maxilla. Methods: This study will be carried out as a randomized controlled clinical trial; patients will be randomly allocated into two groups: in the study group 15 patients will undergo lateral sinus lifting using surgical guide, while in the control group 15 patients will undergo conventional sinus lifting without surgical guide with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical evaluation including intraoperative assessment of duration of surgery and immediate complications such as perforation of Schneiderian membrane, arterial laceration and trauma to adjacent roots and nasal bleeding. Primary implant stability will be measured immediately after implant placement

Interventions

PROCEDURElateral sinus lifting with guide

Including 15 patients who will be treated by lateral sinus lifting using a surgical guide with simultaneous implant placement.

PROCEDUREconventional lateral sinus lifting

including 15 patients who will be treated by conventional lateral sinus lifting without using a surgical guide with simultaneous implant placement.

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient seeking replacement of a missed maxillary posterior tooth/ teeth by a delayed dental implant procedure * Residual bone height is 4-5 mm measured from crestal bone to sinus floor. * Both genders. * Good oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

* Recent radiation therapy in maxilla. * Uncontrolled systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus. * Acute/chronic maxillary sinusitis. * Heavy smoker (those who smoke ≥ 25 cigarettes a day). * Alcohol abuse. * Psychosis. * Severe allergic rhinitis. * Tumor or large cyst in the maxillary sinus. * Oroantral fistula.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
implant stability6 months• Secondary implant stability will be measured 6 months post-operatively using Osstell device.
change in pain scoresup to 7 days\- Post operative pain will be assessed through a 10 point visual analogue scale (VAS). (0-1=none, 2-4=mild, 5-7=moderate, 8-10=severe)
Post operative edema1 weekit will be assessed in the 1st week as following: 1. None (no swelling) 2. Mild (intra oral swelling confined to surgical field) 3. Moderate (extra oral swelling in the surgical zone) 4. Severe (extra oral swelling spreading beyond the surgical zone)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 8, 2026