Skip to content

Validity and Reliability of the 2-Minute Step Test in Patients With Lipedema

Construct Validity and Reliability of the 2-Minute Step Test in Patients With Lipedema: A Cross-Sectional Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07752017
Enrollment
55
Registered
2026-08-07
Start date
2026-08-10
Completion date
2027-04-10
Last updated
2026-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lipedema

Brief summary

Lipedema is a chronic, progressive adipose tissue disorder that predominantly affects women and is characterized by symmetric, disproportionate subcutaneous fat accumulation in the lower extremities, pain, tenderness, and easy bruising. It is associated with reduced mobility and impaired functional capacity. Although the 2-Minute Step Test (2MST) is a practical, low-cost measure of functional capacity that requires no equipment or large space, its validity and reliability have not been investigated in patients with lipedema. The aim of this study is to evaluate the construct validity and test-retest reliability of the 2MST in women with lipedema.

Detailed description

This prospective, cross-sectional study will enroll 55 women diagnosed with lipedema (stage 2 and above) according to the Wold and Halk-Damstra criteria. Participants will undergo the 2-Minute Step Test (2MST), the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Vital signs (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, heart rate) will be checked before testing. Tests will be administered in a fixed order (2MST, then 6MWT, then TUGT) with at least 30 minutes of rest between them, by the same examiner, at similar times of day. To assess test-retest reliability, the 2MST will be repeated after a 7-day interval by the same examiner. Reliability will be evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals, standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change (MDC95). Construct validity will be evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficients between the 2MST and the 6MWT, TUGT, LEFS, and VAS.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Clinically diagnosed with lipedema according to the Wold and Halk-Damstra criteria, stage 2 and above * Aged 18-65 years, female * No walking-limiting pathology * Willing to participate

Exclusion criteria

* Uncontrolled hypertension * Decompensated cardiac failure * Systemic, degenerative, neurological, rheumatological, or orthopedic disease affecting lower-extremity function * Lower-extremity surgery within the past 6 months * Peripheral artery disease causing vascular claudication * Severe psychiatric disorder (active psychosis, severe major depression) or cognitive impairment preventing compliance with test instructions * Neuromuscular disease * Pregnancy * Advanced-stage lipo-lymphedema severely restricting ambulation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
2-Minute Step Test (2MST)BaselineFunctional exercise capacity assessed by the number of times the participant raises the knee to the required height during 2 minutes. Higher scores indicate better functional exercise capacity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)BaselineFunctional exercise capacity assessed by the total distance walked in 6 minutes (meters). Greater walking distance indicates better functional capacity and endurance.
Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT)BaselineFunctional mobility assessed by the time required to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down (seconds). Longer completion times indicate poorer functional mobility and balance.
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)BaselineSelf-reported lower extremity function assessed using a 20-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate better lower extremity function and less disability.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)BaselinePain intensity assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.

Contacts

CONTACTMerve Aydın, MD
merveay9702@gmail.com2124445434
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNurdan Paker, Prof

Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 8, 2026