Skip to content

Effects of Early Mobilization and Feeding After Lobectomy

The Effect of Early Nutrition and Mobilization From ERAS Protocols on Patient Outcomes in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Lobectomy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07749950
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-08-06
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
2026-10-30
Last updated
2026-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Neoplasms

Keywords

Lobectomy, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Early Oral Feeding, Early Mobilization, Postoperative Recovery

Brief summary

This randomized controlled study evaluates the effects of early mobilization and early oral feeding, two components of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol, on postoperative outcomes in adult patients with lung cancer undergoing lobectomy at Ege University Hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention group or a control group. In addition to standard postoperative care, participants in the intervention group received an ERAS-based protocol consisting of sitting at the bedside approximately 5.5 hours after surgery, beginning mobilization at 6 hours, and walking at least 100 meters when clinically stable and approved by the surgical team. Oral water intake was started at 6 hours, followed by a full liquid diet at 7 hours and gradual transition to a regular diet at 12 hours if tolerated. Participants in the control group received the clinic's standard postoperative care. The study compares postoperative pain, complications, chest tube duration, length of hospital stay, reoperation, readmission within 30 days, nutritional status, laboratory findings, and quality of life between the two groups. Participants are followed for up to three months after surgery.

Interventions

OTHEREarly Mobilization

Participants who were hemodynamically stable and approved by the surgical team were seated at the bedside approximately 5.5 hours after surgery for 30 minutes. The first mobilization began at postoperative hour 6, during which participants walked at least 100 meters with appropriate assistance.

For participants who were hemodynamically stable and approved by the surgical team, oral water intake was initiated at postoperative hour 6. If no intolerance occurred, a full liquid diet was started at hour 7, followed by a gradual transition to a regular diet at hour 12.

OTHERStandard Postoperative Care

Participants received the clinic's routine postoperative care following lobectomy.

Sponsors

Ege University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or older * Diagnosis or suspected diagnosis of lung cancer, including: 1. Histologically or cytologically confirmed lung cancer 2. Radiologically suspected lung cancer pending pathological confirmation * Scheduled to undergo lobectomy * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of: 1. ECOG 0 2. ECOG 1 * Ability and willingness to participate, including: 1. Voluntary agreement to participate 2. Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Requirement for emergency surgery * Metastatic disease * Severe uncontrolled comorbid disease, including: 1. Cardiac failure 2. Renal failure 3. Hepatic failure * Requirement for mechanical ventilation for 24 hours or longer * History of cranial trauma * Requirement for prolonged bed rest * Neurological conditions, including: 1. Local peripheral neuropathy 2. Central nervous system disease * Impairment affecting participation, including: 1. Cognitive impairment 2. Communication impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chest Tube DurationFrom surgery until chest tube removal, anticipated up to 30 daysThe duration of chest tube placement is measured in days from the date of surgery until chest tube removal. The mean duration is compared between the experimental and control groups using hospital records.
Postoperative Pain Intensity Assessed Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Postoperative days 1, 2, and 3; 7 days after discharge; and 1 month after dischargePain intensity is assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale, where 0 mm indicates no pain and 100 mm indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. Scores are compared between the experimental and control groups at each assessment time point.
Incidence and Severity of Postoperative ComplicationsFrom surgery through 30 days after surgeryThe number and percentage of participants who develop one or more postoperative complications, including prolonged air leak lasting 7 days or more, atelectasis, pneumonia, chylothorax, atrial fibrillation, or postoperative bleeding. Complication severity is graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Length of Hospital StayFrom surgery until hospital discharge, anticipated up to 30 daysLength of hospital stay is measured in days from the date of surgery until hospital discharge. The mean duration is compared between the experimental and control groups using hospital records.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
All-Cause Hospital Readmission Within 30 Days After DischargeWithin 30 days after hospital dischargeThe number and percentage of participants readmitted to a hospital for any reason within 30 days after discharge are recorded. Readmission status and reason are verified using hospital records and physician assessment and compared between the experimental and control groups.
Unplanned Reoperation Within 30 Days After SurgeryFrom surgery through 30 days after surgeryThe number and percentage of participants requiring an unplanned repeat surgical procedure due to a postoperative complication are recorded using hospital records and physician assessment. Reoperation rates are compared between the experimental and control groups.
Change in Quality of Life Assessed Using the EORTC QLQ-C30Preoperative baseline and 1 and 3 months after hospital dischargeQuality of life is assessed using the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Scale scores are transformed to a range from 0 to 100. Higher global health and functional scale scores indicate better quality of life and functioning, whereas higher symptom scale scores indicate greater symptom burden. Changes from the preoperative assessment are compared between the experimental and control groups.
Change in Lung Cancer-Specific Symptoms Assessed Using the EORTC QLQ-LC13Preoperative baseline and 1 and 3 months after hospital dischargeLung cancer-specific symptoms and treatment-related effects are assessed using the 13-item EORTC QLQ-LC13 questionnaire. Scores are transformed to a range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden. Changes from the preoperative assessment are compared between the experimental and control groups.
Change in Nutritional Risk Assessed Using the NRS-2002Preoperative baseline and 7 days after hospital dischargeNutritional risk is assessed using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002). The total score ranges from 0 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater nutritional risk. A score of 3 or higher indicates that the participant is at nutritional risk. Changes from the preoperative score are compared between the experimental and control groups.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 8, 2026