Skip to content

Agreement Among Three Methods of Intraoperative Core Temperature Monitoring: Nasopharyngeal Probe, TaiDoc TD-1261 Infrared Tympanic Thermometer, and 3M SpotOn™ Skin Sensor

A Prospective Observational Method-Comparison Study of the Agreement Among Nasopharyngeal Temperature Probe, TaiDoc TD-1261 Infrared Tympanic Thermometer, and 3M SpotOn™ Zero-Heat-Flux Skin Sensor for Intraoperative Core Temperature Monitoring in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery Under General Anesthesia

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07749209
Acronym
TEMP-AGREE
Enrollment
270
Registered
2026-08-06
Start date
2026-08-10
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2026-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Body Temperature, Intraoperative Temperature Monitoring

Keywords

core temperature, temperature monitoring, nasopharyngeal probe, infrared tympanic thermometer, zero-heat-flux, SpotOn, TaiDoc TD-1261, Bland-Altman; agreement, method comparison, perioperative hypothermia

Brief summary

Keeping a patient's body temperature normal during surgery is an important part of safe anesthetic care. When the body temperature drops below 36°C (called inadvertent perioperative hypothermia), patients face higher risks of bleeding, wound infection, heart problems, and a slower recovery. To prevent these complications, anesthesiologists monitor core body temperature continuously during surgery. Three monitoring methods are commonly used in clinical practice: (1) a nasopharyngeal probe - a small soft sensor inserted through the nose and placed at the back of the throat, which provides continuous readings and is considered the gold standard; (2) an infrared tympanic thermometer (TaiDoc TD-1261) - a handheld device that measures ear temperature in about one second; and (3) the 3M SpotOn™ sensor - a non-invasive adhesive patch placed on the forehead that continuously estimates core temperature without requiring insertion into any body cavity. Although all three methods are used interchangeably at Srinagarind Hospital, no study has directly compared all three simultaneously in the same patient to determine how well they agree with each other. If significant differences exist between methods, a clinician who switches from one device to another may unknowingly under-detect or over-estimate hypothermia. This study will enroll 92 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University. All three temperature sensors will be applied at the same time, and readings will be recorded simultaneously every 15 minutes throughout the operation. The main goal is to determine whether each device gives results close enough to the nasopharyngeal probe to be safely used as an alternative. The study is observational - no medications or procedures will be added to routine care.

Detailed description

Background: Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH), defined as a core body temperature \< 36.0°C, affects 20-90% of patients undergoing general anesthesia and is associated with coagulopathy, surgical site infection, morbid cardiac events, and prolonged drug metabolism. Accurate intraoperative temperature monitoring is mandated by professional society guidelines. Study design: Prospective, single-center, triple-method observational agreement study at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. All three thermometry modalities are applied simultaneously in each participant. No intervention is assigned; temperature monitoring is additional to standard perioperative care. Methods: After induction of general anesthesia and tracheal intubation, the nasopharyngeal (NP) probe (reference standard), TaiDoc TD-1261 infrared tympanic thermometer (test method 1), and 3M SpotOn™ zero-heat-flux forehead sensor (test method 2) are placed. Simultaneous temperature readings are recorded at 15-minute intervals from 15 minutes after induction until surgery end. For the TD-1261, two consecutive readings are taken at each time point and averaged; pinna retraction and fresh disposable probe cover are used at every measurement. The SpotOn™ sensor requires a 10-minute equilibration period before the first recorded value. Statistical analysis: Primary analysis uses repeated-measures Bland-Altman analysis (Myles & Cui, 2007 framework) to estimate bias and limits of agreement (LoA) for each method pair against the NP probe. Pre-specified clinical acceptability criterion: LoA within ±0.5°C (Sessler, 2008). Variance of differences is decomposed into between-subject (σ²\_B) and within-subject (σ²\_W) components. Secondary analyses: proportional bias assessment, sensitivity/specificity for hypothermia detection (NP \< 36.0°C), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, two-way mixed-effects model), and multivariable linear mixed-effects regression for clinical covariates. Sample size: 92 patients (Lu et al., 2016 method; 80% power; α = 0.05; SD of differences = 0.30°C for NP vs. TM; LoA acceptability threshold ±0.50°C; 15% dropout allowance). This study provides the first institution-specific, population-specific evidence on temperature monitoring agreement in Thai surgical patients and constitutes the first published intraoperative validation of the TaiDoc TD-1261 infrared tympanic thermometer.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Khon Kaen University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * We will include 3 independent groups of patients receiving general anesthesia with tracheal intubation: Group 1: Cardiac surgery Group 2: Thoracic surgery Group 3: General surgery, including neurosurgery * Expected surgical duration ≥ 60 minutes * ASA Physical Status Classification I- III * Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Prior nasal surgery, nasal polyps, deviated nasal septum, or significant epistaxis history precluding safe nasopharyngeal probe insertion * Otitis media, tympanic membrane perforation, significant cerumen impaction, or external auditory canal deformity that would prevent reliable infrared tympanic temperature measurement * Facial or forehead skin lesions, burns, or known adhesive hypersensitivity at the planned 3M SpotOn™ application site, craniotomy, and head and neck surgery. * Baseline core temperature \< 35.0°C or \> 38.5°C at preoperative assessment * Planned use of neuraxial anesthesia as the primary or adjunct technique * Emergency procedures, pregnancy, or procedures involving deliberate hypothermia or cardiopulmonary bypass.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Limits of Agreement Between Each Test Method and the Nasopharyngeal ProbeFrom 15 minutes after anesthesia induction until end of surgery; measurements recorded at 15-minute intervals (estimated total observation window: 60-195 minutes per participant)The 95% limits of agreement (LoA = Bias ± 1.96 × SD\_total) between (i) the TaiDoc TD-1261 infrared tympanic thermometer and the nasopharyngeal probe, and (ii) the 3M SpotOn™ sensor and the nasopharyngeal probe, estimated by repeated-measures Bland-Altman analysis. Pre-specified clinical acceptability criterion: LoA must be contained within ±0.5°C with both 95% CI limits of the upper and lower LoA falling within this range.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Systematic Bias (Mean Difference) of Each Test Method vs. NP ProbeFrom 15 minutes after anesthesia induction until surgery end (15-minute intervals)Mean difference (°C) with 95% CI between each test method and the NP probe across all paired observations, estimated from the repeated-measures Bland-Altman model
Proportional Bias AssessmentFrom 15 minutes after anesthesia induction until surgery endLinear regression of the difference (test - reference) on the mean of both methods, with cluster-robust standard errors; Pitman's test for correlation between sum and difference
Sensitivity and Specificity for Hypothermia DetectionFrom 15 minutes after anesthesia induction until surgery endSensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of each test method for detecting intraoperative hypothermia defined as NP temperature \< 36.0°C, with AUROC estimated by DeLong's method
Intraclass Correlation CoefficientFrom 15 minutes after anesthesia induction until surgery endICC (two-way mixed-effects model, absolute agreement) with 95% CI for each method pair
Percentage of Paired Measurements Within ±0.5°CFrom 15 minutes after anesthesia induction until surgery endPercentage of all paired simultaneous readings in which the test method falls within ±0.5°C of the simultaneous NP reference reading
Clinical Covariate Association With Method DifferenceBaseline characteristics collected before surgery; temperature data from 15 minutes post-induction until surgery endAssociation between clinical covariates (age, sex, BMI, ASA status, surgical duration, anesthetic technique, active warming use, ambient OR temperature, baseline core temperature) and the absolute method difference, estimated by multivariable linear mixed-effects regression
Incidence of Device-Related Adverse EventsFrom device placement until surgery endRate of epistaxis (NP probe), aural discomfort or canal injury (TD-1261), and adhesive skin reaction (SpotOn™) during the monitoring period

Countries

Thailand

Contacts

CONTACTThepakorn Sathitkarnmanee, MD
thepakorns@gmail.com66819547622
CONTACTSirirat Tribuddharat, MD, PhD
sirirat.tribuddharat@gmail.com66816205920

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 7, 2026