Skip to content

Comparing Esketamine and Remazolam With Propofol for Breathing Safety in Pediatric Gastroscopy

A Comparative Study on the Incidence of Respiratory Adverse Events Between Esketamine Combined With Remazolam and Traditional Propofol in Pediatric Gastroscopy

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07748884
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-08-06
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adverse Respiratory Events, Children, Esketamine, Gastroscopy, Hypoxemia, Remimazolam

Keywords

Adverse respiratory events, Hypoxemia, Children, gastroscopy, Esketamine, Remimazolam

Brief summary

Gastroscopy is important for diagnosing and treating upper gastrointestinal diseases in children. To ensure the procedure is safe and smooth, most children require sedation. Compared to adults, children have more fragile airways, lower lung capacity, and poorer oxygen reserves, making them more prone to breathing difficulties and low oxygen levels during sedation. Esketamine, a stronger form of ketamine, helps maintain heart rate and blood pressure and may reduce breathing-related risks. Remimazolam, a new short-acting sedative, acts quickly, allows faster recovery, and has a better safety profile than propofol-it doesn't cause breathing problems or injection pain. The safety and effectiveness of combining remimazolam with esketamine for pediatric gastroscopy have not been well studied. This research will compare this new combination with the traditional propofol-based approach to evaluate its potential benefits and safety in children.

Detailed description

Children scheduled for elective gastroscopy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups: the RA group (Remimazolam Besylate + Esketamine), consisting of 60 cases, and the PF group (Propofol + Fentanyl), also consisting of 60 cases. The induction doses for the RA group were: Remimazolam Besylate 0.65 mg/kg + Esketamine 0.5 mg/kg. The induction doses for the PF group were: Propofol 3 mg/kg + Fentanyl 2 μg/kg. In the RA group, Esketamine 0.5 mg/kg was administered as a single intravenous bolus over 10 seconds. In the PF group, Fentanyl 2 μg/kg was administered as a single intravenous bolus over 10 seconds. After a 1-minute waiting period for both groups, Remimazolam Besylate 0.65 mg/kg was administered intravenously over 15 seconds in the RA group, while Propofol 3 mg/kg was administered intravenously over 15 seconds in the PF group. Gastroscopy commenced once the child's eyelash reflex disappeared and the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score was ≤1. The following parameters were recorded: the time from intravenous induction drug administration to loss of consciousness; the incidence of respiratory adverse events during anesthesia (defined as SpO₂ \<92% lasting ≥30 seconds, apnea, laryngospasm, or severe/persistent coughing); the success rate of intravenous anesthetic sedation; total gastroscopy procedure time; time to emergence from anesthesia; the incidence of postoperative agitation; MOAA/S scores; and vital signs including heart rate, blood pressure, and pulse oxygen saturation.

Interventions

In the PF group, Fentanyl 2 μg/kg was administered as a single intravenous bolus over 10 seconds. After a 1-minute waiting period for both groups, Propofol 3 mg/kg was administered intravenously over 15 seconds in the PF group.

In the RA group, Esketamine 0.5 mg/kg was administered as a single intravenous bolus over 10 seconds.After a 1-minute waiting period for both groups, Remimazolam Besylate 0.65 mg/kg was administered intravenously over 15 seconds in the RA group.

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 6 to 12 years, both sexes; 2. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II; 3. Scheduled for elective gastroscopy or esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) under anesthesia; 4. Preoperative oxygen saturation of 100% while breathing room air; 5. Weight within the normal range for age and gender according to the following reference values (inclusive of endpoints)

Exclusion criteria

1. Contraindications to sedation or anesthesia, or a history of adverse events related to sedation/anesthesia; 2. Known or suspected allergy to the study drug, benzodiazepines, or their reversal agents; 3. History of respiratory disease within the past 2 weeks, or known difficult airway (modified Mallampati score III or IV); 4. History of cardiac, hepatic, renal dysfunction, or metabolic diseases; 5. Patients with congenital diseases or other conditions that may interfere with the evaluation of efficacy outcomes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory Adverse Events During AnesthesiaFrom the start of anesthesia induction until the end of the procedure (gastroscopy withdrawal).Respiratory adverse events are defined as the occurrence of any of the following during the anesthesia period: hypoxemia (SpO₂ \< 92% lasting ≥30 seconds), apnea, laryngospasm, and severe or persistent coughing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success Rate of Intravenous SedationAssessed at the time of anesthesia induction (immediately after initial dose administration).Success is defined as achieving a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score ≤ 1 with the initial dose of the study anesthetic agent.
Success Rate of Gastroscopy CompletionFrom gastroscope insertion until its withdrawal (entire procedure duration).Successful gastroscopy must meet all three requirements: (1) procedure completed without need for alternative sedation; (2) no more than 3 rescue sedation boluses within 5 minutes; and (3) meeting the predefined limits for number and dose of rescue boluses.
Emergence deliriumWithin up to 15-30 minutes after child's first eye opening in the postoperative periodThe pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale consists of five items. Each item is scored 0-4 yielding a total between 0 and 20. The degree of emergence delirium increased directly with the total score. pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale ≥12 at any time indicates presence of emergence delirium.
Awakening timeFrom the withdrawal of the gastroscope (end of procedure) until the patient's first spontaneous eye-opening, assessed immediately during the post-anesthesia recovery period.from the end of gastroscopy to first spontaneous eye-opening

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTHuacheng Liu, Ph.D.
huachengliu@163.com13957770577 Ext. +86
CONTACTYuhang Cai, M.D.
838097626@qq.com18815091585 Ext. +86
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHuacheng Liu, Ph.D.

Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 7, 2026