Skip to content

Comparison of Gingival Depigmentation Using Microneedling and Microneedling With Glutathione Gel - A Split Mouth Clinical Trial

Comparison of Gingival Depigmentation Using Microneedling and Microneedling With Glutathione Gel - A Split Mouth Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07748507
Enrollment
15
Registered
2026-08-05
Start date
2025-06-25
Completion date
2026-07-28
Last updated
2026-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingiival Hyperpigmentation

Keywords

Microneedling, Glutathione, Depigmentation, Repigmentation

Brief summary

The colour of gingiva is important determinant of smile esthetics.Owing to increasing awareness and demand for cosmetic procedures over the past decade, gingival depigmentation has gained popularity among periodontal plastic surgical procedures.

Detailed description

various treatment modalities for depigmentation has been used over the decades. Microneedling is a minimally invasive procedure that creates micro pores on the gingiva which stimulates the natural healing process and improve penetration of topical agents.Glutathione when used has shown promising results in reducing pigmentation which is a major concern with the treatment. In this study 15 patients meeting the eligibility criteria has been randomly assigned to either of the arms.

Interventions

DEVICEMicroneedling using Dermapen device

Dermapen device that is being used for microneedling creates micro conuits because of whuch wound healing will bee improved and it helps penetration of agents effectively

OTHERMicroneedling with 0.5 % Glutathione gel

Usage of micreoneedling with topical application of 0.5% glutathione gel as an adjunct

Sponsors

Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences & Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between the age group of 18 to 45 years * Systemically healthy subjects * Maxillary or mandibular keratinised gingiva with minimum mean SEMPI score of 1(light grey / brown pigmentation) and above.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with thin gingival phenotype(\<1mm) * Patients on drugs that cause oral pigmentation like antimalarials,minocycline, oral contraceptives etc., * Systemic disorders that cause oral pigmentation ,Pregnant and lactating women * Subjects with history of smoking.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of Gingival pigmentation using SEMPI indexbaseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 monthsSeverity and Extension of Gingival Melanotic Pigmentation Index is used for assessing the gingival pigmentation
Assessment of pigment surface area using Image J analysis softwarebaseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of repigmentation6 monthsRepigmentation rate assessed using change in sempi score and pigment surface area on image J over the period
patient reported pain or discomfortat the time of treatment , 1 monthusing visual analog scale

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 6, 2026