Skip to content

Novel Integrated Tube-Bougie Prototype for Endotracheal Intubation in Airway Simulation

A Prospective Randomized Crossover Simulation Study Comparing an Integrated Tube-Bougie Prototype With Standard Stilet-Assisted and Gum Elastic Bougie Assisted Endotracheal Intubation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07747922
Acronym
ITBP
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-08-05
Start date
2026-10-15
Completion date
2026-12-15
Last updated
2026-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management, Difficult Airway, Endotracheal Intubation

Keywords

Difficult Airway, Endotracheal Intubation, Airway Management, Emergency Medicine, Simulation, Manikin, Bougie, Gum Elastic Bougie, Stylet, EPATS, Medical Education

Brief summary

Endotracheal intubation is a critical airway management procedure that frequently requires adjunctive devices, such as stylets or elastic bougies, to facilitate successful tube placement. Although videolaryngoscopy has become increasingly common, access to videolaryngoscopes remains limited in certain clinical settings, particularly in prehospital and resource-constrained environments. Consequently, stylets and bougies continue to play an essential role in airway management. To address this need, we developed a novel integrated tube-bougie prototype that combines the guidance function of an elastic bougie with an endotracheal tube into a single device. This prospective, randomized, crossover simulation study is designed to compare the performance of the integrated tube-bougie prototype with conventional stylet-assisted and elastic bougie-assisted endotracheal intubation. Emergency medicine residents will perform intubations using all three techniques in both normal and difficult airway simulation scenarios according to a randomized crossover sequence. The primary outcome is the time to successful endotracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes include first-attempt intubation success, perceived procedural difficulty assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), incidence of esophageal intubation, dental trauma, and evaluation of the learning curve using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. The findings could contribute to the development of alternative airway assistive equipment for emergency airway management and training.

Detailed description

Endotracheal intubation is one of the most commonly performed advanced airway procedures in emergency and critical care. Successful intubation depends not only on adequate visualization of the glottis but also on successful advancement of the endotracheal tube through the vocal cords. Adjunctive devices, such as stylets and elastic bougies, are widely used to facilitate tube placement. However, these devices require additional procedural steps and device exchanges, which may increase procedural complexity and prolong intubation time. EPATS (Integrated Tube-Bougie Prototype) is a novel airway device developed to integrate the guidance function of an elastic bougie directly into an endotracheal tube. By combining both functions into a single device, EPATS is intended to simplify the intubation process while preserving the advantages of bougie-assisted intubation. This prospective, randomized, crossover simulation study will evaluate the performance of EPATS compared with conventional elastic bougie-assisted and stylet-assisted endotracheal intubation. Emergency medicine residents will perform endotracheal intubation using all three techniques in both normal and difficult airway simulation scenarios according to a randomized crossover sequence. Before study initiation, all participants will receive standardized training in the use of EPATS and the elastic bougie appropriate to their level of experience. All intubation procedures will be performed under standardized simulation conditions. The primary outcome is the time to successful endotracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes include first-attempt intubation success, perceived procedural difficulty assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), incidence of esophageal intubation, dental trauma, and evaluation of the learning curve using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. This study will determine whether EPATS improves procedural efficiency and intubation performance compared with conventional intubation adjuncts in a standardized simulation environment.

Interventions

DEVICEEPATS (Integrated Tube-Bougie Prototype)

The novel integrated tube-bougie prototype developed for endotracheal intubation.

DEVICEStandard gum elastic bougie

Standard gum elastic bougie used as an intubation adjunct.

DEVICEStandard stylet

Standard intubating stylet used as an intubation adjunct.

Sponsors

Huseyin Cahit Halhalli, MD
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV
Health Institutes of Turkey
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Evaluators reviewing the recorded intubation videos will be kept unaware of the intervention assignment information and the identity of the practitioner. Due to apparent differences between intubation techniques, participants and researchers performing the procedures cannot be blinded.

Intervention model description

Participants will perform endotracheal intubation using three different techniques (EPATS, standard gum elastic bougie, and standard stylet) in each of the normal and difficult airway simulation scenarios. The order of interventions will be randomized, and each participant will complete all interventions according to a random crossover sequence.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Professional Status: Being an Emergency Medicine Resident actively undergoing specialty training at the University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine. * Voluntary Participation: Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study and providing written informed consent prior to enrollment. * Postgraduate year (PGY) 1-4 residents. * Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to Participate: Declining to participate or refusing to provide written informed consent. * Physical or Neurological Limitations: Having any pre-existing physical, motor, or neurological impairment that could interfere with manual dexterity, procedural performance, or airway management simulation (e.g., hand injuries, tremors, etc.). * Inability to complete all study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to successful endotracheal intubationDuring the study procedureThe insertion and removal time (seconds) of the laryngoscope from the mouth will be recorded.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First Pass Success (FPS)During the study procedureSuccessful endotracheal intubation without removing the laryngoscope from the mouth. Attempts exceeding 60 seconds will be considered unsuccessful.
Difficulty Assessment (VAS)At the end of the study procedureThe practitioner's difficulty perception will be measured using a 0-100 mm visual analog scale.
Complications (Dental trauma and Esophageal intubation)During the study procedureComplications for each procedure (dental trauma and esophageal intubation) will be determined by the researchers.
Learning Curve (CUSUM)During the study procedureFor each participant, success/failure data will be used for analysis; this analysis will be considered exploratory. The number of endotracheal intubation attempts required to learn will be recorded in the data collection. Sequential intubation performance data will be analyzed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTHuseyin Cahit Halhalli, MD
huseyin.halhalli@sbu.edu.tr+902622252700

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 3, 2026