Dental Crowding, Malocclusion, Angle Class I
Conditions
Keywords
Little's Irregularity Index
Brief summary
The primary aim of the current study was to estimate the validity, reliability, and repeatability of LII measurements
Detailed description
the primary aim of the current study was to estimate the validity, reliability, and repeatability of LII measurements made directly on digital models compared to those made on traditional plaster models. As a secondary aim, the same comparisons will also performed between digital photographs of study models and their corresponding plaster models.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Standardized study models for patients with a full set of permanent teeth (the third molars are not considered). * All study models for patients with Angle class I malocclusion. * All study models for patients with mild to moderate anterior teeth crowding in both arches * Corresponding standardized direct scanned intraoral digital models for all selected study models * Corresponding standardized digital photos for all selected study models * Corresponding standardized digital intra-oral photos for all selected study models
Exclusion criteria
* Damaged or distorted study models * Unclear or distorted digital models (STL file) * Unclear or distorted digital photos of study models (JPG File) * Unclear or distorted intra-oral photos (JPG File)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| validity, reliability, and repeatability of Little's Irregularity Index measurements | 3 months | the primary aim of the current study was to estimate the validity, reliability, and repeatability of LII measurements made directly on digital models compared to those made on traditional plaster models |
Countries
Egypt