Skip to content

Effect of Single-Session HVPGS on Hand Grip Strength and Reaction Time in Healthy Individuals

The Effect of Single-Session Electrostimulation on Grip Strength and Hand Reaction in Healthy Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07745829
Enrollment
42
Registered
2026-08-04
Start date
2025-06-10
Completion date
2025-08-11
Last updated
2026-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Volunteers, Muscle Strength, Neuromuscular Function, Reaction Time

Keywords

High-Voltage Pulsed Galvanic Stimulation, Electrostimulation, Reaction Time, Neuromuscular Priming, Electrophysiology

Brief summary

The aim of this cross-sectional study is to investigate the immediate (acute) effects of a single session of High-Voltage Pulsed Galvanic Stimulation (HVPGS) on hand muscle strength and reaction time in healthy adults. A total of 42 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 65 years undergo a single session of HVPGS applied to the forearm flexor muscles (m. flexor digitorum superficialis, m. flexor digitorum profundus, and m. flexor pollicis longus). Isometric hand grip strength is evaluated before (T0) and immediately after (T1) the intervention using a Jamar hand dynamometer. Sensorimotor reaction time is measured at the same time points using the Nelson Hand Reaction Test. The study aims to determine whether acute HVPGS application elicits immediate bilateral enhancements in mechanical force production and central-mediated processing speed, and whether these gains interact with demographic factors or hemispheric hand dominance.

Detailed description

Background and Rationale:Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) is widely utilized to enhance force production and neural excitability in both clinical and sports settings. High-Voltage Pulsed Galvanic Stimulation (HVPGS) is a unique electrotherapeutic modality characterized by an ultra-short pulse duration and high-voltage peak intensity. Due to its specific wave architecture, HVPGS exhibits reduced capacitive skin impedance, allowing electrical current to penetrate deeper into muscle bellies with minimal cutaneous discomfort. While conventional NMES protocols often induce acute localized fatigue, HVPGS has shown potential as an acute peripheral priming tool. However, evidence regarding its immediate, single-session effects on concurrent motor output (grip strength) and central sensorimotor processing speed (reaction time) remains limited.Study Design and Setting:This cross-sectional, single-arm interventional study was conducted in the Orthopedic Rehabilitation Unit of the School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation at Kırşehir Ahi Evran University. The protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Kırşehir Ahi Evran University (Approval Number: 2025-15/191) and executed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.Participants and Eligibility:A sample of 42 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 65 years was enrolled, including university academic/administrative staff and senior physical therapy students. Sample size was determined via a priori power analysis in G\*Power 3.1.9.2 ($d = 0.79$, $\\alpha = 0.05$, $1-\\beta = 0.80$). Exclusion criteria comprised any self-reported neck or upper extremity discomfort/pain within the preceding 6 months or neurological disorders affecting sensation and motor execution.Study Procedures and Intervention:Baseline Assessment (T0): Participants completed baseline evaluations of bilateral isometric hand grip strength using a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer (seated position, 90° elbow flexion; 3 consecutive trials averaged in kg) and sensorimotor reaction time using the Nelson Hand Reaction Test (5 trials, middle 3 trials averaged in cm).Electrostimulation Intervention: Participants received a single session of HVPGS applied to the forearm flexor muscle group (m. flexor digitorum superficialis, m. flexor digitorum profundus, and m. flexor pollicis longus). The intervention followed an intermittent duty cycle consisting of 7 seconds of active stimulation followed by 14 seconds of rest. The procedure was directly supervised by an expert physiotherapist with 21 years of clinical experience in electrotherapy.Post-Intervention Assessment (T1): Immediately following the completion of the HVPGS session, identical grip strength and reaction time measurements were conducted to record acute functional changes.Statistical Analysis:Data analysis was performed using R statistical software. Pre- and post-intervention changes ($\\Delta = \\text{Post} - \\text{Pre}$) were calculated. Normality was evaluated via Shapiro-Wilk tests. Depending on distributional normality, paired-samples t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were executed to detect immediate therapeutic changes. Secondary interactions with demographic variables (Age, BMI) and subgroups (Sex, Hand Dominance) were analyzed using Pearson/Spearman correlation coefficients and independent t-tests / Mann-Whitney U tests.

Interventions

DEVICEHigh-Voltage Pulsed Galvanic Stimulation (HVPGS)

Application of a single session of High-Voltage Pulsed Galvanic Stimulation (HVPGS) targeting the forearm flexor muscles (m. flexor digitorum superficialis, m. flexor digitorum profundus, and m. flexor pollicis longus). The intervention uses an intermittent duty cycle consisting of 7 seconds of active stimulation followed by 14 seconds of rest, delivered under the direct supervision of an expert physiotherapist.

Sponsors

Kirsehir Ahi Evran Universitesi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Healthy academic and administrative staff, or senior physical therapy and rehabilitation students of Kırşehir Ahi Evran University. Aged between 18 and 65 years. Voluntary participation with signed written informed consent provided prior to enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

Self-reported elbow, hand, shoulder, or neck discomfort in the past 6 months. Presence of active upper extremity pain. Neurological disorders affecting upper extremity sensation or motor execution.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immediate Change in Isometric Hand Grip StrengthBaseline (T0) and Immediately Post-Intervention (T1)Measured in kilograms (kg) using a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer in a standardized seated position with 90 degrees of elbow flexion. Three consecutive trials are performed and averaged.
Immediate Change in Sensorimotor Reaction TimeBaseline (T0) and Immediately Post-Intervention (T1)Measured in centimeters (cm) using the Nelson Hand Reaction Test. Five trials are performed, and the average of the middle three values is recorded.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 5, 2026