Skip to content

Clinical Study Comparing Diosmin vs Rebamipide as Adjuvant Therapies vs Conventional Therapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Study Comparing Diosmin vs Rebamipide as Adjuvant Therapies vs Conventional Therapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07745426
Enrollment
66
Registered
2026-08-04
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2026-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Keywords

rheumatoid arthritis, diosmin, rebamipide

Brief summary

This study will be a randomized controlled parallel study that will be conducted on 66 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who will be diagnosed with RA according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR, 2010). The patients will be recruited from Outpatient Clinic of Rheumatology, Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Tanta University Hospital, Tanta, Egypt. The study duration will be 3 months. The patients will be randomized into three groups: \- Group 1 (control group): will include 22 patients who will receive the conventional therapy for RA for 3 months. \- Group 2 (diosmin group): will include 22 patients who will receive the conventional therapy for RA plus 1000 mg diosmin once daily for 3 months. \- Group 3 (rebamipide group): will include 22 patients who will receive the conventional therapy for RA plus 100 mg rebamipide three times daily for 3 months.

Interventions

1000 mg diosmin once daily for 3 months

100 mg rebamipide three times daily for 3 months

conventional medical treatment for RA

Sponsors

Tanta University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (not in remission) according to American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR). i.e.,28 joints disease activity score (DAS-28) \>2.6. * Both sexes. * Age ranges between 18 and 70 years old. * Patients receiving conventional DMARDs

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant and lactating females. * Patients receiving biological DMARDs or targeted synthetic DMARDs. * Patients with renal and hepatic dysfunction. * Patients with other inflammatory/autoimmune diseases, active infection, or malignancies. * Patients with bleeding disorders, receiving warfarin or other anticoagulants. * Patients receiving antioxidants. * Patients with hypersensitivity to study medications.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The change in Disease Activity score-CRP (DAS28-CRP)At baseline and after three months of the interventiondisease activity will be assessed through: Calculation of 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28) using C- reactive protein level (CRP) according to the following formula: DAS28-CRP = \[0.56\*√ (tender joint count) + 0.28\*√ (swollen joint count) + 0.36\*ln (CRP+1)\]\*1.10 + 1.15\]
The change in The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scoreAt baseline and after three months of the interventionthe functional status of the participants will be assessed through: The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The change in serum level of C- reactive protein (CRP)three months
The change in serum level of Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)three months
The change in serum level of Matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3)three months

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTkhlood mohamed kettana, assistant lecturer
khlood.kettana@pharm.tanta.edu.eg01091100037

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 5, 2026