Skip to content

Research On Advanced Diagnostics and Management of All Pregnancies to Prevent Stillbirth (ROADMAPS)

NICHD Stillbirth Research Consortium: Research on Advanced Diagnostics and Management of All Pregnancies to Prevent Stillbirth (ROADMAPS)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07745101
Acronym
ROADMAPS
Enrollment
7000
Registered
2026-08-04
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2030-07-31
Last updated
2026-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stillbirth

Keywords

Stillbirth, Fetal growth restriction

Brief summary

The primary objective of the Stillbirth Research Consortium (SBRC) longitudinal cohort study is to develop and evaluate a robust multivariable prediction model to identify pregnancies at \<14 weeks gestation that are at increased risk of stillbirth or fetal growth restriction (FGR), often reflecting underlying placental dysfunction. Secondary objectives include: * To evaluate placental pathology among cases and selected controls using standardized Amsterdam criteria. * To identify key aspects of perinatal nutrition contributing to placental dysfunction * To determine relationships between maternal biomarkers, placental pathology and energetics, with the goal of identifying biomarkers predictive of placental dysfunction * To develop a risk stratification model for pregnancies complicated by decreased fetal movements (DFM)

Detailed description

In the United States, stillbirth defined as fetal death at or beyond 20 weeks' gestation affects approximately 5.48/1,000 births, or 1 in 180 pregnancies, a rate that surpasses many other high-resource countries, highlighting major opportunities for improvement and prevention. Prevention of stillbirth in the United States requires improved risk stratification to identify pregnancies at highest risk. Unfortunately, commonly used pre-pregnancy risk factors such as parity, advanced maternal age, and body mass index are poor predictors of stillbirth and explain only a small proportion of stillbirth risk. Critical gaps in stillbirth risk stratification hamper efforts to accurately identify at-risk pregnancies early enough to enable effective interventions and ultimately reduce stillbirth and those on the path to stillbirth. FGR is frequently a manifestation of underlying placental dysfunction and one of the strongest known risk factors for stillbirth, with a stillbirth rate of 1.5% (two-fold increased risk). FGR, defined as a fetus that fails to reach its growth potential, is difficult to diagnose. The term small for gestational age, defined as estimated or actual birthweight below the 10th percentile, is often used interchangeably with FGR, although it does not distinguish between constitutionally small fetuses and those affected by pathologic growth restriction. Early onset FGR is well recognized as a major risk factor for stillbirth, yet nearly half of FGR fetuses are not detected antenatally. The development of abnormal fetal umbilical artery (UA) Doppler indices differentiates between constitutionally small fetuses and those with increased risk of stillbirth. Estimated fetal weight below the 3rd percentile has been associated with a further increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome irrespective of Doppler indices (3-fold risk over 3rd to 5th percentile, and 4- to 7-fold risk over 5th to 10th percentile). To address the need for more timely identification of pregnancies at risk for stillbirth or FGR, we will conduct a longitudinal prospective cohort study to develop a prediction model to identify pregnancies at \<14 weeks gestation with increased risk of stillbirth or severe FGR. We will use the Hadlock nomogram to define birthweight percentile since we seek to identify at-risk pregnancies prenatally. Placental Dysfunction Placental dysfunction is a central biological pathway underlying both FGR and many stillbirths. It reflects the inability of the placenta to meet the metabolic demands of a growing fetus. However, placental dysfunction is heterogenous and difficult to diagnose during an ongoing pregnancy. Post delivery, placental dysfunction can be identified following a complete pathologic evaluation, using standardized pathologic criteria, including maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM), fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM), inflammatory villitis of unknown etiology (VUE) or acute chorioamnionitis (ACA) patterns of injury, or as Massive Perivillous Fibrin Deposition/Maternal Floor Infarction (MPVFD/MFI) as defined by the Amsterdam Workshop Guidelines. Despite advances in placental pathology, there are currently no validated biomarkers that can reliably identify placental dysfunction during pregnancy. The placenta generates and utilizes considerable energy to support its own function consuming half of the oxygen and nutrients supplied to the pregnant uterus. Measurement of trophoblast energetics in vitro post-delivery allows assessment into placental "health" and ability to support the fetus. To address the need for more timely identification of pregnancies at risk for stillbirth and FGR, we will utilize innovative placental imaging and biomarkers to examine early indicators of placental dysfunction before 14 weeks' gestation and their association with stillbirth and severe FGR (Secondary Objective). Perinatal Nutrition Perinatal nutrition is a potentially modifiable factor that influences placental function and pregnancy outcomes. Higher diet quality has been associated with lower allostatic load, while suboptimal perinatal nutrition is associated with stillbirth and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Nutritional status is critical for the health of the pregnant individual, placental function, and developing offspring. By understanding the role of nutrition in pregnancy outcomes, we will be able to better identify high-risk individuals and potential interventions. Decreased Fetal Movements DFM are generally assessed as part of standard care; however, assessment and management vary widely, and evidence regarding their predictive value is inconsistent. Within this cohort, we will collect standardized data on fetal movements and evaluate their association with adverse outcomes. These data will be used to develop a risk stratification framework and inform best practices for the clinical management of DFM. Together, achieving these objectives will provide a better understanding of these factors will provide robust information to inform clinical practice to improve birth outcomes in the United States.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

RTI International
Lead SponsorOTHER
Old Dominion University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Utah
CollaboratorOTHER
Columbia University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, San Diego
CollaboratorOTHER
Oregon Health and Science University
CollaboratorOTHER
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Early Pregnancy Cohort Inclusion Criteria * 18 years of age * Gestational age at enrollment: Between 12.0 and 13.6 weeks of gestation * Pregnant individuals receiving care at participating clinical sites with intent of delivering at study hospital * Consent to participate in study procedures through 6 weeks postpartum Late Pregnancy Cohort * 18 years or older * Gestational age at enrollment: greater than or equal to 28.0 weeks gestational age * Clinical indications of risk FGR \<10th percentile or report of decreased fetal movement) * Pregnant individual receiving care at participating clinical sites with intent of delivering at study hospital * Consent to participate in study procedures through 6 weeks postpartum

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of fetal genetic anomaly or major structural malformation * Known fetal aneuploidy based on chorionic villus sampling * Positive cell-free fetal DNA screening for aneuploidy * Multifetal gestation * Less than 18 years of age * Not fluent in either English or Spanish

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The primary outcome is a composite outcome of stillbirth or severe placental dysfunction, defined as the occurrence of birth at or beyond 20.0 weeks of gestation.7 days post deliveryStillbirth, Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) or Neonatal Mortality \<7 days among births at ≥20.0 weeks' gestation meeting one or more of the following: * Stillbirth among births at \>20.0 weeks' gestation * FGR defined as: FGR \< 3rd percentile FGR 3 - \<10th percentile with at least one of the following criteria: Umbilical artery Doppler \> 95th percentile for either systolic/diastolic ratio (S/D), pulsatility index (PI), or resistance index (RI) Oligohydramnios Non-reassuring fetal heart rate or biophysical profile \- Neonatal death less than or equal to 7 days, excluding non-medical causes Primary outcome Time Frame: Birth through 7-days post delivery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
StillbirthDeliveryStillbirth among all births
Fetal growth restriction (FGR)DeliveryFetal growth restriction \<10%ile with at least one of the following criteria: * Umbilical artery Doppler \> 95th percentile for either systolic/diastolic ratio (S/D), pulsatility index (PI), or resistance index (RI) * Oligohydramnios * Non-reassuring fetal heart rate or biophysical profile
Neonatal mortalityUp to 7 days after deliveryEarly neonatal mortality among live births
Placental dysfunction among stillbirths, fetal growth restriction and neonatal deathsDeliveryPlacental dysfunction will be defined using the Amsterdam Criteria including the following characteristics: Maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM), fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM), VUE, or MPVFD/MFI; other important findings associated with placental insufficiency; and/or cord abnormalities associated with placental insufficiency
Cause of stillbirthDeliveryClassification of cause of stillbirth using published classification system
Apgar scoreDeliveryAmong fetal growth restriction (\<10th%ile) infants, 5-minute Apgar score
Neurologic injuryBirth to 7 daysEvidence of neurologic injury among infants with severe FGR
Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE)Birth to 7 daysHIE based on the Sarnat examination among infants with severe fetal growth restriction.
Intraventricular hemorrhagedeliveryDiagnosis of intraventricular hemorrhage among infants with severe fetal growth restricition.
HypotensionBirth to 7 daysHypotension requiring vasopressor or inotrope for cardiovascular support among infants with severe fetal growth restriction
Cord arterial blood gasBirth to 7 daysCord arterial blood gas demonstrating pH \<7.0 or base excess \> 12 mEq/L among infants with severe fetal growth restriction
SeizuresBirth to 7 daysNeonatal seizures among infants with severe fetal growth restriction
Gestational age at deliveryDeliveryEstimated gestational age at delivery based on early ultrasound among infants with severe fetal growth restriction.
Days admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)Birth to day 28Number days admitted to the NICU among infants with severe fetal growth restriction

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTElizabeth McClure, PhD
mcclure@rti.org919-316-3773
CONTACTCarla Bann, PhD
cmb@rti.org919-485-2773
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORElizabeth McClure, PhD

RTI International

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 5, 2026