Skip to content

Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Ozonated Oil in Atopic Dermatitis

Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Ozonated Oil in Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07744516
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-08-04
Start date
2021-09-22
Completion date
2026-04-10
Last updated
2026-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema)

Brief summary

This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical ozonated vegetable oil formulation in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. The study follows a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design and compares clinical progression, as assessed using the SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) index, quality of life, as measured using the IDQoL (Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index), and various safety and cosmetic acceptability outcomes over a 14-day follow-up period. In addition to conventional clinical efficacy endpoints, the study includes responder analyses and quality-of-life assessments to provide a more comprehensive characterisation of the potential therapeutic benefit of ozonated oil in this population.

Detailed description

A pilot, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a topical formulation based on ozonated vegetable oil in paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of topical ozonated oil in reducing the severity of paediatric atopic dermatitis, as quantified by the change in the total SCORAD score from baseline to the follow-up visits, from both a continuous perspective, based on the absolute change in SCORAD, and a clinical-response perspective. The secondary objectives are: To evaluate the impact of treatment on atopic dermatitis-related quality of life using the IDQoL questionnaire. To evaluate the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvements in SCORAD according to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) criteria. To quantify the need for rescue medication. To assess the safety and tolerability of the active formulation. To evaluate cosmetic acceptability and subjective satisfaction with the treatment. The study follows a parallel, two-arm design, with participants randomly assigned to receive either the active formulation or placebo. The active treatment consists of a topical ozonated vegetable oil formulation, whereas the control group receives a placebo formulation containing the same non-ozonated lipid vehicle. The use of the same vehicle in both groups ensures cosmetic and organoleptic comparability between the formulations, thereby supporting the maintenance of blinding throughout the trial. The study is conducted under double-blind conditions, such that neither the clinical investigators nor the patients' parents or legal guardians are aware of treatment allocation during follow-up. Formulation coding and randomisation assignments remain concealed until completion of the statistical analysis. The total clinical follow-up period is 14 days, with assessments performed at three time points: Baseline visit (Day 0) Follow-up visit (Day 7 ± 1) Final visit (Day 14 ± 2) The data collected at each study visit are summarised below: Baseline visit Demographic variables Clinical and atopic history Dermatological history Baseline SCORAD assessment IDQoL questionnaire Day 7 visit Interim SCORAD assessment IDQoL questionnaire Adverse events Treatment adherence Rescue medication use Day 14 visit Final SCORAD assessment Adverse events Treatment adherence Rescue medication use Treatment satisfaction, tolerability, and cosmetic acceptability variables The study is conducted at the paediatric outpatient clinics of Clínica Quirón Valencia, Torrevieja Hospital, and the Novelda and Alcantarilla-Sangonera Primary Care Centres. The investigational product, corresponding to the active treatment, is Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil. The comparator product, corresponding to placebo, consists of a formulation prepared using the same lipid vehicle but without ozonation. The oil is applied topically once every 12 hours, corresponding to two applications per day, to the affected areas throughout the 14-day study follow-up period. Although the management of atopic dermatitis during the study is based on the topical application of either the active product or the comparator, the use of rescue medication is permitted at the investigators' discretion. The study population comprises paediatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of active mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. Eligible patients are between 1 month and 6 years of age and are required to meet clinical criteria consistent with atopic dermatitis, as determined by specialist medical assessment. The total study sample comprises 50 patients.

Interventions

Ozoaqua® Ozonated Oil

OTHERnon-ozonated oil

Same lipid vehicle, without ozonation.

Sponsors

Laboratorios Ozoaqua
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients aged between 1 month and 6 years. * Clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis. * Active mild or moderate flare. * Baseline SCORAD score between 20 and 50 points. * Availability of parents or legal guardians to administer the treatment and complete the follow-up period. * Written informed consent provided by the parents or legal guardians.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe atopic dermatitis. * Clinically relevant active skin infection. * Recent use of systemic immunosuppressive treatments. * Serious concomitant diseases. * Known hypersensitivity to any component of the formulation. * Clinical conditions that could interfere with the interpretation of the therapeutic response.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in SCORAD score from baseline at days 7 and 1414 daysThe primary efficacy outcome is the total SCORAD (Scoring Atopic Dermatitis) score, a widely validated instrument for the clinical assessment of atopic dermatitis. Three SCORAD assessments are performed throughout the study: at baseline, day 7, and day 14. The SCORAD index comprises three domains: \- SCORAD A: Extent This domain assesses the percentage of body surface area affected. In patients younger than 2 years of age, age-specific anatomical weightings for the paediatric population are applied. \- SCORAD B: Intensity This domain includes the clinical assessment of six dermatological signs: erythema, oedema, oozing/crusting, excoriation, lichenification, and xerosis. Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3. \- SCORAD C: Subjective symptoms This domain assesses the perceived severity of pruritus and sleep disturbance, each quantified on a scale from 0 to 10. \- The total SCORAD score is calculated using the standard formula: SCORAD = A/5 + (7 × B)/2 + C

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number and percentage of patients achieving a SCORAD response at days 7 and 14 relative to baseline14 daysA response is defined as a reduction in SCORAD of ≥8.7 points from baseline, in accordance with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) reported by Schram et al. for this scale. An MCID responder is defined as a patient who achieved this reduction in score
Change in IDQoL score from baseline at day 77 daysQuality of life is assessed using the Infants' Dermatitis Quality of Life Index (IDQoL), a questionnaire specifically designed for paediatric atopic dermatitis. Two IDQoL assessments are performed during the study: at baseline and on day 7. The questionnaire comprises 10 items covering pruritus, sleep disturbance, mood, feeding, play and activities, treatment-related problems, dressing, and bathing. Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in quality of life.
Number and percentage of patients requiring rescue medication during the 14-day follow-up period14 daysDuring the study, the use of rescue treatments for the management of recurrences or new flares of atopic dermatitis is recorded at the investigators' discretion. Rescue treatment is defined as the use of any medication for the management of flares, particularly topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines.
Number of days of rescue medication use during the 14-day follow-up period.14 daysDuring the study, the use of rescue treatments for the management of recurrences or new flares of atopic dermatitis is recorded at the investigators' discretion. Rescue treatment is defined as the use of any medication for the management of flares, particularly topical corticosteroids and oral antihistamines. In addition to the type and dose of medication, the number of days of administration is recorded.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 5, 2026