Skip to content

Preventive Role of Melatonin and Propranolol Administration in Pediatric Migraine

Preventive Role of Melatonin and Propranolol Administration in Pediatric Migraine - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07743255
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-08-03
Start date
2026-06-10
Completion date
2026-12-10
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Migraine Disorders

Keywords

Pediatric Migraine, Migraine with Aura, Migraine without Aura, Melatonin, Propranolol

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether adding melatonin to propranolol provided better prevention of migraine in children than propranolol alone. The study included 60 children aged 5-15 years with migraine, diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria, who attended the Pediatric Outpatient Department of Nishtar Hospital, Multan. Participants were randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive either melatonin 3 mg at bedtime plus propranolol 1 mg/kg/day in two divided doses, or propranolol 1 mg/kg/day alone, for three months. Migraine attacks, pain severity, attack duration, migraine-related disability, use of pain-relieving medicines, treatment adherence, and adverse effects were recorded at baseline and during follow-up visits at one, two, and three months. Parents or caregivers maintained a daily headache and medication diary throughout the treatment period. Blood pressure and pulse rate were also monitored because propranolol may cause low blood pressure or a slow heart rate.

Interventions

DRUGMelatonin

Melatonin 3 mg was administered orally once daily at bedtime for three months in addition to propranolol.

DRUGPropranolol

Propranolol 1 mg/kg/day was administered orally in two equal divided doses, equivalent to 0.5 mg/kg per dose in the morning and evening, for three months.

Sponsors

Nishtar Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 5 to 15 years. * Both male or female. * Confirmed diagnosis of migraine (with or without aura) based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) criteria. * Patients with a PEDMIDAS score ≥11, indicating moderate to severe migraine-related disability.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of chronic medical conditions affecting the central nervous system, such as epilepsy, neurodegenerative diseases, or brain tumors. * Current use of prophylactic migraine medications (other than those being evaluated in the study) or recent discontinuation within the last four weeks. * Patients with diagnosed primary sleep disorders not related to migraine. * Known allergy or hypersensitivity to melatonin, propranolol, or any related medication used in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Monthly Migraine Attack FrequencyBaseline and Months 1, 2, and 3Monthly migraine attack frequency was defined as the number of migraine attacks occurring during a 30-day period, as recorded by the parent or caregiver in the daily headache diary. Separate attacks were identified by a pain-free interval of at least 24 hours. Change from baseline was calculated by comparing the number of attacks recorded before treatment with the number recorded during follow-up. A greater reduction indicated better preventive efficacy.
Change in Migraine Pain SeverityBaseline and Months 1, 2, and 3Migraine pain severity was assessed using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale, where 0 represented no pain and 10 represented the worst possible pain. The parent, caregiver, or child recorded the severity of each migraine attack in the headache diary. The average pain score for each 30-day assessment period was calculated and compared with the baseline value. A greater reduction indicated improvement in migraine severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Migraine-Related DisabilityBaseline and Month 3.Migraine-related disability was assessed using the Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire. The total score was calculated from six questions evaluating missed or impaired school, home, social, and recreational activities during the preceding three months. Scores were categorized as minimal disability, 0-10; mild disability, 11-30; moderate disability, 31-50; and severe disability, greater than 50. A lower score indicated less migraine-related disability.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORShazia Parveen

Nishtar Hospital Multan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 4, 2026