Skip to content

Effectiveness of AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation

Effectiveness of AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation: Evidence From a Staggered Rollout at the Western Uusimaa Wellbeing Services County

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07742618
Enrollment
400
Registered
2026-08-03
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effectiveness of AI-assisted Clinical Documentation Tool, Healthy

Keywords

AI Scribes, Clinical Notes, Nurse Time Use, AI Clinical Documentation Tools

Brief summary

Effectiveness of AI-assisted clinical documentation tool (AI scribes) in healthcare services using staggered difference-in-differences and multiple sources of data including registers, questionnaires and interviews. Primary outcomes include completion of statutory health check-ups, working hours, time use of nurses, secondary outcomes include subjective nurse job satisfaction, job burden and perceived quality of work and time use.

Interventions

DEVICEAI clinical documentation tool

AI clinical documentation tool is adopted starting at different assigned time points by eight subgroups. Early vs later adopters are compared using staggered difference-in-differences design. The order of subgroups is randomized for 7/8 subgroups.

Sponsors

University of Turku
Lead SponsorOTHER
University of Helsinki
CollaboratorOTHER
Helsinki University Hospital, Finland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Staggered rollout/difference-in-differences design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Member of study population: nurses working at wellchild or student health care services of Western-Uusimaa Wellbeing Services County.

Exclusion criteria

* Nurse works in several teams. * Under 18 years.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ratio of completed statutory health check-ups7 months.
Number of completed statutory health check-ups7 months.
Working Hours7 months.Number of working hours (average and dynamic measures)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time use7 months.Questionnaire. Time used in documentation and other tasks (self-assessed). "How much time did you spend on each activity during the preceding workday (on average per client)? 1. Documentation (record-keeping / charting) 2. Client contact (direct client encounters / face-to-face client interaction) 3. Other (e.g. special responsibilities, prescriptions)"
Job Satisfaction7 months.Questionnaire: 1. How satisfied have you been with your work during the preceding workday? Very dissatisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied Somewhat satisfied Very satisfied 2. How often has each of the following clearly disturbed, worried, or burdened you at work during the preceding workday? 1. Constant time pressure and the burden of unfinished tasks Very rarely or never Fairly rarely Occasionally Fairly often Very often or constantly 2. Too little time to do the work properly Very rarely or never Fairly rarely Occasionally Fairly often Very often or constantly 3. How well do you feel you performed your work tasks (from the patient's perspective) during the preceding workday? Very dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied Neither dissatisfied nor satisfied Fairly satisfied Very satisfied

Countries

Finland

Contacts

CONTACTLaura Jernström, PhD
laura.jernstrom@utu.fi+358413629767

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 4, 2026