Skip to content

Cold and NSAID Trial for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Comparison Between Local Cryoprevention Associated With NSAIDs Versus NSAIDs Alone for Reducing the Incidence of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07738094
Enrollment
583
Registered
2026-07-30
Start date
2026-06-09
Completion date
2028-08-31
Last updated
2026-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatitis, Acute

Keywords

Post-ERCP Pancreatitis, Cryoprevention, ERCP, NSAIDs

Brief summary

The standard prophylaxis for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is performed with rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). A recent Japanese study demonstrated the efficacy of irrigating the periampullary region with ice water, however without the concomitant use of NSAIDs. The proposed study is a randomized, single-center, single-blind clinical trial that aims to compare the efficacy of rectal NSAIDs alone versus NSAIDs associated with ice water in the prevention of PEP.

Detailed description

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of instilling ice-cold distilled water (4ºC to 5ºC) into the second duodenal portion as an adjunct to the standard practice of using NSAIDs, comparing it with a group using NSAIDs only to reduce the incidence of PEP. This is a randomized, sequential, blinded, 1:1 paired clinical trial conducted at a single tertiary center. An initial sample of 530 participants was calculated; considering a 10% drop-out, the final calculation was 583 people. All patients will undergo ERCP under sedation or general anesthesia and will be hydrated intravenously with lactated Ringer's. Rectal administration of NSAIDs (indomethacin 100mg) will be performed for all patients without contraindications. In the intervention group, immediately after the end of the therapeutic ERCP, 250 ml of ice-cold distilled water (4º to 5ºC) will be injected towards the papillary region. The control group will undergo standard ERCP and standard pharmacological prophylaxis (indomethacin 100mg), without the instillation of ice-cold distilled water.

Interventions

PROCEDURENSAID alone

Standard ERCP, hydration with lactated Ringer's, and standard pharmacological prophylaxis (indomethacin 100mg), without the instillation of ice-cold distilled water.

PROCEDURECryoprevention associated with NSAID

Standard ERCP, hydration with lactated Ringer's, rectal administration of NSAIDs (indomethacin 100mg), and irrigation of the duodenal papilla with 250 ml of ice-cold distilled water (4º to 5ºC).

Sponsors

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Neither the patients nor the researchers responsible for data extraction and statistical analysis will know which group the patients are assigned to. However, the physicians performing the procedure will not be blinded, as the endoscopist will be operating the device and will therefore be aware of whether or not ice-cold water was used.

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment (Randomized 1:1 paired clinical trial)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18 years or older * Clinical indication for ERCP * Presence of native major duodenal papilla without previous manipulation * Ability of the patient or companion to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to ERCP (e.g., severe hemodynamic instability, visceral perforation) * Ongoing acute pancreatitis (except mild biliary where ERCP is therapeutic and pain has already resolved) * Inaccessibility of the duodenal papilla (e.g., Gastrectomies with Billroth II and Roux-en-Y reconstruction, or gastroduodenal obstructions) * Pregnant women * Refusal to participate in the study or inability to sign the ICF * Contraindication to NSAID use.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (PEP).Immediately after the procedure until 03 days after the procedureNew or worsened abdominal pain consistent with pancreatitis, associated with an elevation of serum amylase or lipase at least 3 times the upper limit of normal

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PEP SeverityDay 1 (24 hours post-procedure) and 7 days post-procedureClassified as mild, moderate, or severe based on the length of hospital stay and local/systemic complications
CholangitisDay 1 (24 hours post-procedure) and 7 days post-procedureDefined by fever, jaundice, and/or leukocytosis with evidence of biliary obstruction or need for reintervention.
BleedingDay 1 (24 hours post-procedure) and 7 days post-procedureClinical evidence of hemorrhage (melena, hematemesis) or drop in hemoglobin \> 2g/dL requiring transfusion or endoscopic/surgical intervention.
PerforationDay 1 (24 hours post-procedure) and Day 7 (7 days post-procedure)Radiological or surgical evidence of air or luminal content leakage into the abdominal cavity or retroperitoneum.
MortalityUp to 90 days post-procedureDeath from any cause up to 90 days after the procedure

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

CONTACTProf. Dr. Fauze Maluf Filho
fauze.maluf@terra.com.br+55 11 99191-9014
CONTACTDr. Mateus Bond Boghossian
matbogho@gmail.com+55 11 91795-4571
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFauze Maluf Filho

Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 26, 2026