Skip to content

Evaluation of Pin Buckle Bone Plates for Management of Anterior Mandibular Fractures

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Pin Buckle Bone Plates for Management of Anterior Mandibular Fractures: A Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07736430
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-07-30
Start date
2025-06-11
Completion date
2026-05-02
Last updated
2026-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mandibular Fractures, Parasymphysis Fractures, Symphysis Fractures

Keywords

Anterior mandibular fracture, Parasymphysis fracture, Symphysis fracture, Pin Buckle bone plate, Conventional miniplate, Internal fixation, Maxillofacial trauma, Bone plate, Computed tomography, Randomized clinical trial, Open reduction and internal fixation

Brief summary

This randomized clinical study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a novel Pin Buckle bone plate compared with conventional two-miniplate fixation for the management of anterior mandibular (symphysis and parasymphysis) fractures. Twenty adult patients requiring open reduction and internal fixation will be randomly allocated into two equal groups. The study group will receive fixation using the Pin Buckle bone plate, while the control group will be treated using conventional titanium miniplates. Clinical outcomes including pain, edema, wound healing, and postoperative complications will be evaluated during the postoperative follow-up period. Radiographic assessment using computed tomography (CT) will be performed immediately after surgery and at 6 months to evaluate bone density. The study seeks to determine whether the Pin Buckle bone plate provides improved postoperative healing and functional outcomes compared with conventional miniplate fixation.

Interventions

DEVICEPin Buckle Bone Plate

A titanium Pin Buckle bone plate used for internal fixation of anterior mandibular fractures following open reduction.

Conventional titanium miniplates used for internal fixation of anterior mandibular fractures following open reduction according to Champy's principles.

Sponsors

Suez Canal University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive fracture fixation using either the Pin Buckle bone plate (study group) or conventional two-miniplate fixation (control group). Outcomes were compared between the two parallel groups during the postoperative follow-up period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients aged 18 to 55 years old. * Adult patients of either gender. * Patients who are free from any systemic disease (ASA I). * Patients suffering from recent, simple and single symphyseal or parasymphyseal mandibular fractures. * Unfavorable fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation. * Patients willing to attend all postoperative follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating women. * Patients with associated maxillofacial injuries that may interfere with study outcomes. * Patients with comminuted mandibular fractures. * Patients with infected fractures. * Patients with pathological fractures. * Previously failed fixation of symphyseal or parasymphyseal fractures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic Bone DensityPreoperative, immediately postoperative and after 6 monthsBone density at the fracture site was measured in Hounsfield Units (HU) on multislice CT using standardized regions of interest to evaluate osseous healing.
Wound HealingDay 1, Day 7, and Day 14Wound healing was assessed clinically using the Southampton Wound Assessment Scale, which evaluates postoperative wound healing based on the presence and severity of normal healing, erythema, bruising, discharge, wound dehiscence, and infection. Higher grades indicate poorer wound healing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative PainDay 1, Day 7, and Day 14Pain intensity was assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Postoperative EdemaDay 1, Day 7, and Day 14Facial edema was evaluated clinically by visual inspection and palpation and categorized as none, low-grade, intermediate-grade, or high-grade according to the severity of facial swelling.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRMohamed Said Hamed, Professor

Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Faculty of Dentistry - Suez Canal University

STUDY_DIRECTORAhmed Abdelmohsen Younis, Associate Professor

Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Faculty of Dentistry - Suez Canal University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMohamed Abdelnaby, B.S.D

Resident Zagazig University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 31, 2026