Skip to content

Robotic Systems Evaluation for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions (RISE Trial)

Robotic Systems Evaluation for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: A Randomized Trial (RISE Trial)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07735611
Enrollment
398
Registered
2026-07-30
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2026-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung; Node

Keywords

Bronchoscopy, Robotic assisted bronchoscopy, Monarch™, ION™ Endoluminal System

Brief summary

This is an investigator-initiated cluster randomized control trial. The primary objective is to compare the diagnostic yield of two Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared national robotic assisted bronchoscopy platforms - the Monarch™ Platform and the ION™ Endoluminal System - in participants undergoing bronchoscopy to evaluate peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Participants will undergo their scheduled robotic assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) using one of these platforms.

Detailed description

Roughly 1.6 million lung nodules are identified every year in the United States. When tissue sampling is required, robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) systems are increasingly used to reach peripheral targets inaccessible to standard bronchoscopy. Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) has rapidly evolved as a promising modality for sampling PPLs. Two FDA-cleared robotic platforms are currently in clinical use: the ION™ Endoluminal System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) and the Monarch™ Platform (Johnson & Johnson MedTech / Auris Health, Redwood City, CA). Both platforms were cleared through the FDA 510(k) pathway, which requires demonstration of substantial equivalence to predicate devices but does not mandate comparative effectiveness data prior to commercialization. The ION™ system uses shape-sensing fiber-optic technology to track catheter position with high precision throughout the bronchial tree. It has been shown in multiple studies to achieve diagnostic yields ranging from 67-85%, with enhanced performance when combined with intraprocedural cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The recent RELIANT trial (the first cluster-randomized controlled trial in interventional pulmonology) demonstrated that ION™ was non-inferior to electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) with integrated digital tomosynthesis, with diagnostic yields of 77.8% and 75.5% respectively (P for non-inferiority = 0.007). The Monarch™ platform uses a hybrid approach combining electromagnetic tracking and robotic catheter control with a continuously visualizing bronchoscope (4-way articulation). A key feature of the Monarch™ is direct bronchoscopic vision throughout navigation, enabling real-time assessment of the airways and the target lesion. The Monarch™ has received additional FDA clearance for bronchoscopic transparenchymal nodule access (BTPNA), allowing access to lesions without a direct airway path. Published studies report diagnostic yields of 66-81% for the Monarch™ platform, though most are single-center, non-randomized studies with varying definitions of diagnostic yield, co-intervention use, and did not fully use integrated intraprocedural imaging (including fluoroscopy and CBCT, as available and integrated). Critically, no randomized or high-quality comparative study has directly compared the ION™ and Monarch™ platforms head-to-head with integrated intraprocedural imaging. As both systems are now available at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and represent substantial capital expenditures, high-quality prospective comparative data are urgently needed to guide clinical decision-making and resource allocation. This trial leverages the existing dual-platform clinical infrastructure at UHCMC to conduct a pragmatic, cluster-randomized, non-inferiority trial embedded within routine clinical care

Interventions

PROCEDURERAB via the Monarch platform

The Monarch™ (Monarch) platform is one of two FDA-cleared robotic platforms currently in clinical use for robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB). It uses a hybrid approach combining electromagnetic tracking and robotic catheter control with a continuously visualizing bronchoscope (4-way articulation). A key feature of the Monarch platform is direct bronchoscopic vision throughout navigation, enabling real-time assessment of the airways and the target lesion.

PROCEDURERAB via the ION platform

The ION™ Endoluminal System (ION) platform is one of two FDA-cleared robotic platforms currently in clinical use for robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (RAB). It uses shape-sensing fiber-optic technology to track catheter position with high precision throughout the bronchial tree.

Sponsors

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study is being conducted at University Hospitals, where there are two bronchoscopy procedure rooms (BPR). The unit of randomization is the BPR day. Each BPR day constitutes one cluster. The robotic bronchoscopy platform assigned to each BPR each day is determined by random allocation each morning via sealed, opaque, day-of-week-stratified envelopes prepared by a biostatistician not involved in clinical care or participant scheduling.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years at the time of bronchoscopy. * Scheduled to undergo navigational bronchoscopy (either ION™ or Monarch™) for the evaluation of a pulmonary lesion at University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (UHCMC). * Able and willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Enrolled in another clinical trial that requires the use of a specific navigational/robotic bronchoscopy platform. * Enrolled in another bronchoscopy-related clinical trial. * Participant or legally authorized representative declines participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic yield defined as the proportion of procedures that result in the acquisition of lesional tissueUp to Day 14Diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of procedures that result in the acquisition of lesional tissue. This will be measured for both procedures conducted via the Monarch platform and the ION platform.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of the robotic bronchoscopy proceduresDay 0The duration of the robotic bronchoscopy procedure will be measured in minutes for both the Monarch platform and the ION platform.
Safety, measured by the number of complicationsUp to Day 7Safety will be measured by the number of complications that occur within 7 days of the procedure for both the Monarch platform group and the ION platform group.
Radiation exposureDay 0Radiation exposure is defined as the radiation dose delivered to the participant during the study bronchoscopy and is recorded as a dose area product in milligray per centimeters squared (mGy/cm2). Radiation exposure is measured for both the Monarch platform group and the ION platform group.
Rate of additional diagnostic procedures required within 12 monthsUp to 12 monthsThe rate of additional diagnostic procedures required within 12 months of the study bronchoscopy will be assess for both the Monarch platform group and the ION group.
Diagnostic accuracy at 12 months post-biopsyUp to 12 monthsDiagnostic accuracy at 12 months post-biopsy is defined as the number of true positive lesions (malignant) plus true negative lesions (specific benign diagnosis) with no evidence of malignancy at 12-month follow-up (no interval biopsy diagnostic of malignancy, regression on CT or stable size with no plan for repeat diagnostic procedure), divided by the total number of biopsied lesions. This will be assessed for both the Monarch platform group and the ION platform group.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTSameer K Avasarala, MD
Sameer.Avasarala@uhhospitals.org216-844-3201
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSameer K Avasarala, MD

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospitals

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 31, 2026