Skip to content

Comparison of Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' Method for Teaching Basic Surgical Skills

Comparison of Peyton's Four-Step Approach and Halsted's 'See One, Do One' Method for Teaching Basic Surgical Skills: A Randomised Study Assessing Long-Term Retention in a Pakistani Medical School

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07735026
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-07-29
Start date
2025-01-09
Completion date
2026-03-23
Last updated
2026-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Retention of Basic Surgical Skills, Surgical Skills Performance Score

Keywords

Surgical skills, peyton's method, Halsted's Method

Brief summary

This study aimed to compare Halsted's "See One, Do One" method with Peyton's Four-Step Approach for teaching basic surgical skills to undergraduate medical students in a simulated skills-laboratory setting at Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi. Medical students were randomised to Halsted and Peyton Arms and were taught Four Surgical Skills i-e Gloving by open method, Incision Making, Interrupted suturing, One-handed reef knot. After three months, all participants were recalled to perform the same set of skills. Each participant performed individually in a controlled setting while being video recorded. The recordings were later evaluated by an independent assessor(academic surgeon) blinded to the participants' group allocation. Skill performance was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where 1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = satisfactory with mistakes, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = average, 5 = good, and 6 = perfect.

Detailed description

Skills-lab training as a procedural teaching approach is nowadays part of the training programs of almost all medical faculties. Certain components like observation, clinical skills, practice and decision-making have been shown to contribute to a successful learning experience in skills labs. It offers a safe, "mistake-forgiving" training environment that allows students to practice procedures on mannequins, with standardised patients or with each other before performing procedural skills on real patients, The positive effect of skills-lab training sessions on learning outcomes and transfer of acquired skills to clinical practice has been shown in a variety of different settings. It has become a necessity for every undergraduate medical student/teacher to be aware of the basic methodologies taught through skills lab training, which should be practised in every medical institution. In the studies, a lot of instructional techniques that include various steps to convey clinical technical skills to learners have been described. It includes some established teaching techniques, for example, Halsted's traditional teacher-centred "See one do one" approach. In this form of teaching, students learn only by observing an experienced surgeon explaining and demonstrating the skill. This can later be practised on artificial skin models. It's a process of active learning in a continual cycle. Another instructional approach that is becoming increasingly pervasive in medical studies is "Peyton's Four-Step Approach" This methodology was established based on the work of Peyton and was readily adapted in the last decade by medical institutes throughout the world. It consists of four clearly defined instructional steps: * Step 1 - "Demonstrate": The trainer demonstrates the skill without adding any comments. * Step 2 - "Talk the trainee through": The trainer demon¬strates the respective skill while explaining each proce¬dural sub step in detail. * Step 3 - "Trainee talks trainer through": The trainer performs the skill for a third time, based on the sub steps described to him/her by the trainee. * Step 4 - "Trainee does": The trainee performs the skill on his/her own Probable benefits of the technique include the grouping of several learning theories. Especially step three, when the trainee instructs the trainer, seems to be an important step in student learning. The student first has to analyse the first two steps, which are based on a social-cognitive approach to learning theory, i.e. thinking and sharing. This gives the student time to organise their thoughts before actively saying it. In addition, the reasoning process called self-explanation seems to facilitate the integration of new knowledge into existing knowledge. We know it is no question that the instructional methods used to develop better grip of new clinical skills have huge impact in developing skill performance, but the contrasting results of different instructional methods for different surgical skills including both basic and advance surgical skills, require further evaluation. This study aims to determine the better approach of teaching surgical skills, so that the same would be employed in future to impart surgical skills to junior surgeons, postgraduate trainees, interns and undergraduate students in skills lab.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALHalsted's approach

Participants in Halsted group were taught the following four skills employing Halsted 'see one do one' approach: 1. Gloving by open method. 2. Incision Making 3. Interrupted suturing 4. One-handed reef knot

BEHAVIORALPeyton's approach

Participants in this group were taught the following four skills employing Peyton's Four-step approach: 1. Gloving by open method. 2. Incision Making 3. Interrupted suturing 4. One-handed reef knot

Sponsors

Dow University of Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Medical students of DMC with no prior exposure to surgical skills.

Exclusion criteria

* Students who had previously attended any basic surgical skills workshop. * Students who had participated in surgical camps or had prior hands-on surgical experience.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skill Performance score3 monthsAfter three months, all participants in both arms were recalled to perform the same set of skills. Each participant performed individually in a controlled setting while being video recorded. The recordings were later evaluated by independent assesor blinded to the participants' group allocation. Skill performance was assessed using a six-point Likert scale, where 1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = satisfactory with mistakes, 3 = satisfactory, 4 = average, 5 = good, and 6 = perfect.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Teach skill1 dayThe time required to teach each of the four skills was recorded in both arms.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSyed Ali Haider, FCPS,F.MAS, FACS

Dow University of Health Sciences & Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 11, 2026