Skip to content

The Addition of Core Muscle Training on Tennis Serve Speed in Tennis Players

The Effect of Adding Core Muscle Training With Shoulder Strengthening in Tennis Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07733869
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-07-29
Start date
2026-06-15
Completion date
2026-09-20
Last updated
2026-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tennis, Tennis Serve Performance

Keywords

Serve Speed, Core Training, Shoulder training, strengthening, total glenohumeral arc of rotation

Brief summary

Compared with shoulder-only training and with continued tennis training alone, will the addition of core strengthening to shoulder training produce significantly greater improvements in flat serve ball speed in healthy tennis players? Secondary Hypothesis: * Combined core + shoulder training will produce greater improvement in serve accuracy than shoulder-only training or tennis training alone. * Combined core + shoulder training will produce greater improvement in TGAR than shoulder-only training or tennis training alone. * Combined core + shoulder training will produce greater improvement in core strength/endurance and shoulder rotational strength than the comparator groups.

Detailed description

The kinetic chain model suggests that core musculature plays a crucial role in transferring energy from the lower body to the upper extremity during the tennis serve. However, evidence on the relationship between core strength and tennis serve (TS) ball speed and passive total glenohumeral arc of rotation (TGAR) remains inconsistent, warranting further investigation. It is hypothesized that the addition of core muscle exercises to the training program would yield greater improvements in terms of tennis serve ball speed and TGAR when compared to a control group performing only shoulder exercises in tennis players. Tennis players with at least 1-3 years of weekly tennis training will be included and allocated randomly into the control group (CG) and experimental group (EG). CG participants will perform shoulder exercises and sham core exercises. EG participants will receive the same training as CG in addition to performing core exercises. Both groups will participate in a 12-week intervention (2 sessions per week, 50 minutes per session). Pre- and postintervention assessments will include TS ball speed analysis and TGAR, respectively.

Interventions

OTHERShoulder Strengthening Program+ Sham core Treatment

Delivered 2×/week for 10 weeks under supervision of a licensed physical therapist or certified strength and conditioning specialist. Progressive resistance program including: * External/internal rotation strengthening (resistance band, cable, or dumbbell) at 0° and 90° abduction * Scapular stabilization exercises (rows, Y-T-W raises, serratus punch) * Posterior shoulder stretching (sleeper stretch, cross-body stretch) for the TGAR component * Progressive overload every 2 weeks based on tolerated resistance/repetitions Sham :Low-intensity, non-progressive trunk mobility exercises with minimal loading (e.g., seated trunk rotations without resistance, cat-camel stretches), matched for session time and attention to control for non-specific training effects, without targeting core strength/endurance adaptation.

OTHERShoulder Strengthening Program+ Core Strengthening Program

Delivered 2×/week for 10 weeks, same sessions as the shoulder program (combined \~50-60 minute sessions), progressive core program including: * Anti-rotation exercises (Pallof press) * Rotational power exercises (medicine ball rotational throws, cable woodchoppers) * Anterior/lateral/posterior chain stability (plank variations, side plank, bird-dog) * Progressive overload via increased resistance, hold time, or instability surface every 2 weeks

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy adults aged 18-35 years * Recreational to competitive non-professional tennis players (currently playing ≥2 sessions/week for ≥1 year; NTRP 3.0-5.0 or equivalent ITN; no professional ranking or tour-level competition history) * Right- or left-hand dominant (serve arm recorded) * Able to perform a full flat serve without pain * Willing to maintain current tennis training routine and refrain from starting other new strength/conditioning programs during the study

Exclusion criteria

* Current or history of shoulder pain/injury in the past 6 months (e.g., rotator cuff pathology, labral injury, impingement) * Low back pain or lumbar spine pathology in the past 6 months * Prior shoulder or spine surgery * Systemic conditions affecting neuromuscular function (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, neurological disorders) * Pregnancy * Current participation in a structured core or shoulder strengthening program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Flat serve ball speedmeasured at baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 12).Flat serve ball speed (km/h or mph), measured via radar gun (e.g., Stalker Pro II) or equivalent validated device, averaged across the best 5 of 10 flat serves hit into the deuce-side service box, measured at baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 12).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serve accuracymeasured at baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 12).* Target-based scoring system: standardized service box divided into scoring zones (e.g., 5 concentric/quadrant zones worth 1-5 points); participant hits 10 flat serves aimed at a designated target zone (e.g., wide serve to deuce court corner); accuracy score = mean points across 10 serves. * Recorded simultaneously with ball speed trials (speed-accuracy trade-off examined as an exploratory outcome).
Total glenohumeral arc of rotation (TGAR)measured at baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 12).● Passive internal rotation (IR) + external rotation (ER) range of motion measured via goniometry (or inclinometer) with scapula stabilized, participant supine, shoulder abducted to 90°, elbow flexed to 90°. TGAR = IR + ER (degrees). Measured bilaterally.
Shoulder rotational strengthmeasured at baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 12).● Peak IR and ER isometric or isokinetic torque (Nm), measured via hand-held dynamometer (standardized stabilization protocol) or isokinetic dynamometer (60°/sec and 180°/sec) if available, at 0° abduction. ER/IR strength ratio calculated. Measured bilaterally.
Core strength/endurancemeasured at baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 12).● McGill core endurance battery: trunk flexor endurance test (seconds), bilateral side-bridge/plank endurance test (seconds).

Countries

Lebanon

Contacts

CONTACTAhmad El Melhat, PhD
a.melhat@bau.edu.lb+20 111 259 5022

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 30, 2026