Skip to content

VW-50 Feasibility Study

A Feasibility Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the VividWhite Glaucoma Implant (VW-50) for the Treatment of Glaucoma.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07730424
Enrollment
10
Registered
2026-07-28
Start date
2022-08-04
Completion date
2023-10-17
Last updated
2026-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Brief summary

An investigator-initiated 10-participant Feasibility Study to assess a novel glaucoma drainage implant, VW-50.

Detailed description

A single-centre, investigator-initiated device Feasibility Study where 10 participants undergo glaucoma surgery for implantation of a novel implant (VW-50) and receive 12 months of follow-up.

Interventions

DEVICESurgical implantation of VW-50

Implantation of VW-50 (alone or in combination with cataract surgery)

Sponsors

Melbourne Eye Specialists
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age - greater than 18 years of age. * Glaucoma - as diagnosed by the investigator based upon untreated intraocular pressure, disc appearance, and visual field abnormalities. * Failed medical treatment - In the opinion of the investigator, the IOP is uncontrolled in the study eye after having failed previous medical treatment. * Conjunctival health - In the opinion of the investigator the participant should have a healthy, free, and mobile conjunctiva in the target quadrant. * Capable - Ability to understand and willingness to follow study instructions and is likely to complete all required visits and procedures. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Prior glaucoma surgery in the study eye. * Advanced glaucomatous optic nerve damage which, in the opinion of the investigator, threatens fixation and/or standard surgery would be considered safer. * Active neovascular glaucoma, Iridocorneal Endothelial (ICE) Syndrome, traumatic glaucoma, silicone oil induced glaucoma, active acute angle closure glaucoma or subluxation of the lens. * Active diabetic retinopathy, choroidal neovascularization, branch retinal vein occlusion, central retinal vein occlusion, proliferative retinopathy, or other ophthalmic disease or disorder in the study eye that could confound study results. * Any condition of the cornea that could confound study results or would preclude accurate readings with an applanation tonometer and/or a contact pachymeter. * Visually significant cataract in the study eye that will not be removed at the time of implantation. * BCVA worse than 6/30 (Snellen equivalent) * Clinically significant inflammation or infection in either eye * Unfit for local anaesthetic surgery. * Any uncontrolled systemic disease. * Female participants who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy during the study, or who are of childbearing potential and not using a reliable means of contraception during the study. * Significant risk of bleeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary feasibility outcomeAt study interventionAssessment of the ease of implantation of VW-50 in the human eye, measured by surgeon questionnaire assessment of implantation technique (custom 11-item questionnaire with 5 responses selectable per item, ranging from 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree')

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary feasibility outcome 1At study interventionDuration of surgical implantation (mean, in minutes, excluding time for cataract extraction \& IOL insertion)
Secondary feasibility outcome 212 monthsConfirmation that VW-50 entry cannula was inserted into the anterior chamber (binary outcome with gonioscopy photograph evidence)
Safety and tolerability outcome 112 monthsIncidence of all adverse events
Safety and tolerability outcome 212 monthsParticipant ocular quality of life assessed by 7-item local symptoms component of the SHPC-18 questionnaire
Safety and tolerability outcome 312 monthsBest-corrected visual acuity (change compared to baseline)
Safety and tolerability outcome 412 monthsCorneal endothelial cell density measured by Specular microscopy (mean change from baseline)
Efficacy outcome 112 monthsMean Intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction at each post-operative timepoint and study conclusion, in mmHg
Efficacy outcome 212 monthsReduction in concomitant IOP-lowering medications at each post-operative timepoint and study conclusion (number of medications).

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 29, 2026