Skip to content

ESPB Versus SPSIPB for Quality of Recovery After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block for Quality of Recovery After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07729488
Enrollment
128
Registered
2026-07-27
Start date
2026-08-01
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2026-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain

Brief summary

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain despite its minimally invasive nature. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB) are promising regional analgesic techniques for thoracic surgery; however, evidence directly comparing their effects on postoperative quality of recovery remains limited. This prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial aims to compare the effects of ESPB and SPSIPB on postoperative quality of recovery, measured by the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores, tramadol consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, rescue analgesic requirement, postoperative nausea and vomiting, patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, block-related complications, and perioperative hemodynamic parameters.

Detailed description

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become the preferred surgical approach for many thoracic procedures because of its minimally invasive nature. Nevertheless, patients frequently experience moderate to severe postoperative pain, which may impair respiratory function, delay mobilization, prolong hospitalization, and negatively affect overall recovery. Effective multimodal analgesia is therefore essential for optimizing postoperative outcomes. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB) are interfascial plane blocks that have demonstrated promising analgesic efficacy in thoracic surgery. Although both techniques are increasingly used in clinical practice, evidence directly comparing their effects on postoperative quality of recovery following VATS is limited. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial will enroll 128 adult patients (18-70 years, ASA physical status I-III) undergoing elective VATS. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ultrasound-guided ESPB or ultrasound-guided SPSIPB before surgery. The primary outcome is the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain scores at rest and during coughing, cumulative 24-hour tramadol consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, rescue analgesic requirement, postoperative nausea and vomiting, sedation level, patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, block-related complications, perioperative hemodynamic variables, and additional analgesic requirements. The results of this study are expected to provide high-quality evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of ESPB and SPSIPB in improving postoperative recovery and analgesic outcomes after VATS and may contribute to optimizing regional analgesia strategies for thoracic surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREESPB

An ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block will be performed preoperatively for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The block will be performed using the standardized study protocol.

PROCEDURESPSIPB

An ultrasound-guided serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block will be performed preoperatively for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The block will be performed using the standardized study protocol.

Sponsors

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants and postoperative outcome assessors will be blinded to treatment allocation. Ultrasound-guided blocks will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist who will not participate in postoperative assessments.

Intervention model description

Participants undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) or ultrasound-guided serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB). Outcomes will be compared between the two parallel groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18-85 years. * ASA physical status I-III. * Scheduled for elective VATS under general anesthesia. * Able to understand and complete the QoR-15 questionnaire. * Written informed consent provided.

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal to participate or inability to provide written informed consent. * Known allergy or contraindication to bupivacaine, paracetamol, dexketoprofen, or tramadol. * Infection at the planned block injection site. * Coagulopathy or ongoing anticoagulant therapy precluding regional anesthesia. * Severe hepatic or renal insufficiency. * Chronic opioid use or chronic pain requiring regular analgesic treatment. * Previous thoracic surgery on the operative side. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Cognitive impairment, psychiatric illness, or language barrier preventing completion of the QoR-15 questionnaire. * Body mass index (BMI) \>35 kg/m². * Conversion from VATS to thoracotomy. * Failed or incomplete regional block.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) Score24 hours after surgeryPostoperative quality of recovery will be assessed using the validated Turkish version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire. The total score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better recovery. The preoperative QoR-15 score will be recorded as a baseline measurement and considered in the analysis of the postoperative 24-hour score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain at Rest30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after surgery.Postoperative pain intensity at rest will be assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Postoperative Pain Intensity During Coughing30 minutes, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after surgery.Postoperative pain intensity during coughing will be assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), with scores ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Time to First Rescue AnalgesiaDuring the first 24 hours after surgeryThe time from arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) to the first administration of rescue analgesia will be recorded in minutes.
Cumulative Postoperative Tramadol ConsumptionDuring the first 24 hours after surgeryThe total amount of tramadol administered for postoperative rescue analgesia during the first 24 hours after surgery will be recorded in milligrams (mg).
Requirement for Rescue AnalgesiaDuring the first 24 hours after surgeryThe proportion of participants requiring at least one dose of rescue analgesia during the first 24 hours after surgery will be recorded.
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Impact ScoreDuring the first 24 hours after surgeryPostoperative nausea and vomiting will be assessed using the Simplified Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Impact Scale. The scale combines the number of vomiting episodes and the perceived impact of nausea on recovery, with a total score ranging from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate a greater impact of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and a score of 5 or greater indicates clinically important PONV.
Patient Satisfaction With Postoperative Analgesia24 hours after surgeryPatient satisfaction with postoperative pain management will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = satisfied, and 5 = very satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater patient satisfaction.
Postoperative Length of Hospital StayFrom surgery until hospital discharge (up to 30 days)Postoperative length of hospital stay will be recorded as the number of days from surgery until hospital discharge.
Incidence of Block-Related ComplicationsFrom block performance until hospital discharge (up to 30 days)The incidence of block-related complications, including local anesthetic systemic toxicity, pneumothorax, hematoma, infection, vascular puncture, and other procedure-related adverse events, will be recorded.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTFatma Acil, M.D.
acilfatma@gmail.com+905337225225
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFatma Acil, M.D.

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 28, 2026