Skip to content

Assessment Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Custom Made Plates Versuscustom Made Titanium Plates in Treatment of Mandibular Body Fractures

Radiographic Assessment of Accuracy of Computer-assisted Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Custom Made Plates Versus Computer-assisted Custom Made Titanium Plates in Treatment of Mandibular Body Fractures (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07729345
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-07-27
Start date
2025-02-01
Completion date
2026-08-01
Last updated
2026-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mandibular Body Fractures

Keywords

PEEK, mandibular body fractures, titanium plates

Brief summary

The design of the custom made Plates is customized to meet the individual needs of each patient and surgeon. By selecting plate design features, surgeons can customize the plate to create a patient specific solution. The Patient Specific Plates are manufactured to the planned patient anatomy, eliminating the time needed for intraoperative adaption and creating a stronger plate with a lower overall profile. But Custom made plates were made in many materials such as titanium, Vitalium, PEEK, etc In this study we will compare the PEEK one with the titanium one to know which one is better in all aspects and if the PEEK one can overcome the shortcoming of the titanium one or not.

Detailed description

In patients with mandibular body fractures, will PEEK custom made plates be more efficient in reduction of body fractures accurately than titanium custom made plates (in terms of radiographic and clinical parameters)?

Interventions

PROCEDUREcomputer-assisted Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) custom made plates

computer-assisted Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) custom made plates in mandibular body fractures management

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with at least a unilateral body fracture indicated for Open reduction internal fixation. --Dentate adult patients. * All ages and both sexes were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with systemic disease (may affect normal healing). * Patients with old and/or mal united fractures (affect accuracy of re-reduced the fractured segments). * Patients whom cannot tolerate follow up intervals (affect accuracy of study results).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
radiographic assessment of accuracy in mandibular body fractures management3 monthsusing Mimics software

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 28, 2026