Skip to content

Treatment of Pectoralis Trigger Points in Patients With Pseudo Angina

Comparative Effects of Graston Technique Versus Local Ischemic Compression on Trigger Points of Pectoralis Major and Minor Among Pseudo-angina Patients

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07728357
Acronym
GT-LIC
Enrollment
36
Registered
2026-07-27
Start date
2026-07-25
Completion date
2026-11-01
Last updated
2026-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Chest Pain, Myofascial Pain Syndromes, Pectoralis Muscles, Pseudo Angina

Keywords

chest pain, Non-cardiac chest pain, Myofascial pain syndrome, Graston Technique, Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization, Chest wall pain, Musculoskeletal chest pain, Local Ischemic Compression

Brief summary

Pseudo-angina is a musculoskeletal condition characterized by chest pain that resembles angina but occurs due to non-cardiac causes, particularly myofascial trigger points in the chest wall muscles. Trigger points in the pectoralis major and minor muscles may contribute to pain, discomfort, and functional limitations by affecting muscle activity and movement. Manual therapy techniques such as the Graston Technique and Local Ischemic Compression (LIC) are commonly used to manage soft tissue dysfunction and myofascial trigger points. This study aims to compare the effects of the Graston Technique and Local Ischemic Compression on pain reduction and functional improvement in patients with pseudo-angina.

Detailed description

This is Multiple-center, randomized controlled trail. Participants age 25-50 years with diagnosed pseudo angina will be referred from cardiology department of Aziz Fatima and Faisal hospital to Madina Teaching hospital (MTH) Physiotherapy ward and Jafar Physiotherapy Clinic. After informed consent Participants will be randomly assign to one of two parallel groups using a random number generator. Group A (Experimental): Receive Graston technique 3 sessions per week for total duration 4 weeks. Group B (Active Comparator) receive the LIC 3 sessions per week for total duration 4 weeks. Outcome measures (pain via NPRS, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)) are taken at baseline and end of treatment. Data will be analyzed using Spss version 20.

Interventions

OTHERGraston Technique

A stainless-steel Graston instrument was applied using controlled strokes at approximately a 45° angle to the skin surface, following the direction of the muscle fibers and across the fibers to mobilize soft tissue restrictions. The treatment was applied for approximately 40-120 seconds over each targeted area.

OTHERLocal Ischemic Compression

Sustained manual pressure was applied gradually over each trigger point until a tolerable level of discomfort was achieved. The compression was maintained for approximately 90 seconds per trigger point and repeated 1-3 times during each treatment session according to patient tolerance and clinical response. The technique was performed using the therapist's thumb, finger, or knuckle depending on the location and depth of the trigger point

Sponsors

University of Faisalabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants which fulfill the Simon's Trigger Point Diagnostic Criteria * Referred by Cardiologist • Patients with Trigger Points in chest Muscles and left Pectoralis Major and Minor muscles.

Exclusion criteria

* Spinal Deformity • Gastric Problems • Any cardiac disease • Heart Burns • Panic Attacks • Pleurisy • Pulmonary Embolism • Pericarditis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder Pain Disability IndexBaseline and 4 week post interventionThe Shoulder Pain and Disability Index is a well-known neutral measure for assessing the level of pain and functional impairment experienced by people with shoulder issues. It is frequently used in clinical and research settings to assess the severity of shoulder problems and track therapy efficacy. It consists of 13 elements organized into two subscales. The Pain Subscale consists of five items that determine how intense pain is in various circumstances, such as at rest or during activities. The disability subscale consists of eight items: it assesses the level of difficulty with specific everyday shoulder-related tasks, such as lifting weights or putting on a shir
Numeric Pain Rating ScaleBaseline and 4 week post interventionNPRS was used as a primary outcome measure to evaluate pain intensity in patients with pseudo-angina. On the scale, 0 represents no discomfort and 10 represents severe pain. At rest and while engaging in activities, participants were asked to rate their level of pain.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

CONTACTDr. Muhammad Muneeb Jafar, PhD Physical therapy
muneebjafar.DPT@tuf.edu.pk+923127000616
CONTACTDr Maryam Farooq, Phd Physical therapy
Maryamfarooq2527@gmail.com+923326760155

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 28, 2026