Skip to content

Dry Cord Care Versus Alcohol Cord Care in Healthy Newborns

Effects of Routine Umbilical Cord Care and Natural Drying Care on Neonatal Infection Rates, Cord Separation Time, and Cost-Effectiveness: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07728058
Enrollment
210
Registered
2026-07-27
Start date
2026-07-07
Completion date
2028-04-01
Last updated
2026-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Newborn, Umbilical Cord Infection

Keywords

Dry Cord Care, Alcohol Cord Care, Umbilical Cord, Newborn, Randomized Controlled Trial, Umbilical Cord Infection, Cord Separation Time, Bacterial Colonization, Healthcare Resource Utilization

Brief summary

Umbilical cord care is an essential component of newborn care, but the optimal method remains controversial. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare routine alcohol cord care with natural dry cord care in healthy newborns. A total of 210 mother-infant dyads will be randomly assigned to either routine alcohol cord care or natural dry cord care. The primary outcome is the incidence of umbilical cord infection. Secondary outcomes include umbilical cord separation time, bacterial colonization, and healthcare resource utilization for umbilical cord care. The findings of this study will provide evidence to support optimal umbilical cord care practices for healthy newborns.

Detailed description

Umbilical cord infection remains an important cause of neonatal morbidity worldwide. Although the World Health Organization recommends dry cord care for healthy newborns born in healthcare facilities under hygienic conditions, routine alcohol cord care is still widely practiced in many hospitals. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of these two approaches in Taiwan remains limited. This investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to compare routine alcohol cord care with natural dry cord care among healthy newborns delivered at New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital. Healthy newborns who remain in the routine newborn nursery and are not admitted directly to the Newborn Care Center (NBC) or Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) will be eligible for enrollment. A total of 210 mother-infant dyads will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either routine alcohol cord care or natural dry cord care using computer-generated randomization. Newborns assigned to the routine alcohol cord care group will receive standard alcohol-based umbilical cord care according to institutional practice. Newborns assigned to the natural dry cord care group will receive dry cord care without topical antiseptics while maintaining routine hygienic care. The primary outcome is the incidence of umbilical cord infection. Secondary outcomes include umbilical cord separation time,bacterial colonization assessed using bacterial cultures, and healthcare resource utilization for umbilical cord care, including nursing time, frequency of cord care, cord care materials, and associated costs.Umbilical cord status and clinical signs of infection will be assessed daily during hospitalization. After discharge, caregivers will continue follow-up assessments by submitting standardized photographs of the umbilical cord to a secure study-specific LINE group until one day after cord separation. This study is expected to provide high-quality clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness, safety, and healthcare resource utilization associated with natural dry cord care compared with routine alcohol cord care and may contribute to future evidence-based neonatal cord care recommendations.

Interventions

OTHERRoutine Alcohol Cord Care

Routine alcohol-based umbilical cord care performed according to institutional standard practice.

OTHERNatural Dry Cord Care

Natural dry cord care without topical antiseptics while maintaining routine hygienic care.

Sponsors

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Days to 28 Days
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy neonates with a gestational age of 35 weeks or greater. * Birth weight of 2,300 g or greater. * Normal umbilical cord appearance at birth, with no evidence of trauma, infection, or congenital abnormalities of the umbilical cord.

Exclusion criteria

* Neonates born to mothers with intrapartum fever (≥38°C), clinical chorioamnionitis, or rupture of membranes for more than 18 hours * Meconium-stained amniotic fluid. * Neonates admitted directly to the Newborn Care Center (NBC) or Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) after birth. * Neonates from multiple gestations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Umbilical Cord InfectionFrom birth through one day after umbilical cord separationUmbilical cord infection will be assessed based on clinical signs, including redness, swelling, warmth, purulent discharge, foul odor, and abnormal body temperature. Newborns with signs suggestive of infection will be clinically evaluated, and the number and percentage of participants with umbilical cord infection will be compared between the two study groups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Umbilical Cord Separation TimeFrom birth until umbilical cord separationTime from birth to spontaneous umbilical cord separation, recorded in days.
Bacterial ColonizationAt birth before the first cord care and on Day 3 after birthBacterial colonization of the umbilical cord will be assessed using bacterial cultures collected at birth before the first cord care and on Day 3 after birth.
Healthcare Resource Utilization for Umbilical Cord CareFrom birth through hospital discharge, typically 3-4 days after birthHealthcare resource utilization will be assessed by measuring nursing time in minutes, frequency of cord care, and cord care materials used during hospitalization. Material costs and nursing time will be compared between the two study groups.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

CONTACTTZU-MIN CHEN, RN
zimin0915@cgmh.org.tw+886903566915
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTZU-MIN CHEN, RN

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 28, 2026