Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Topical Formula Versus Placebo in Patients With Melasma

Efficacy and Safety of a Combined Topical Formula (Azelaic Acid and Tranexamic Acid) Versus Placebo in Patients With Melasma: Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07727954
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-07-27
Start date
2026-06-12
Completion date
2026-07-13
Last updated
2026-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melasma

Keywords

Melasma, Hyperpigmentation, Azelaic acid, Tranexamic acid, Placebo-controlled

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether a topical formulation containing 12% azelaic acid and 5% tranexamic acid is effective and safe for treating melasma in adults. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the topical formulation reduce melasma severity compared with placebo after 4 weeks of treatment? Is the topical formulation safe and well tolerated? Researchers will compare the active topical formulation with a placebo cream to determine whether the active treatment provides greater improvement in melasma severity and quality of life. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to receive either the active topical formulation or a placebo cream. Apply the assigned treatment daily for 4 weeks. Attend scheduled clinical visits for assessment of melasma severity using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI), quality of life using the Melasma Quality of Life Scale (MelasQoL), and standardized facial imaging with the VISIA® skin analysis system. Be monitored for local adverse events throughout the study.

Detailed description

Melasma is a chronic acquired pigmentary disorder characterized by symmetrical facial hyperpigmentation that significantly affects patients' quality of life. Although several topical therapies are available, treatment responses are often variable and recurrence is common. Azelaic acid inhibits melanogenesis through tyrosinase inhibition, whereas tranexamic acid modulates inflammatory and vascular pathways involved in melasma pathogenesis. Their complementary mechanisms suggest that combined topical administration may provide greater therapeutic benefit than either approach alone. This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a topical formulation containing 12% azelaic acid and 5% tranexamic acid compared with placebo in adults with melasma. Participants are randomly assigned to receive either the active formulation or placebo and are followed for four weeks. Clinical efficacy is assessed using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI), patient-reported quality of life using the Melasma Quality of Life Scale (MelasQoL), and standardized facial imaging with the VISIA® skin analysis system. Safety is evaluated through the monitoring and documentation of local adverse events throughout the study. The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this combined topical formulation as a potential therapeutic option for the treatment of melasma.

Interventions

DRUGTopical azelaic acid 12% plus tranexamic acid 5%

Topical formulation containing 12% azelaic acid and 5% tranexamic acid administered for the treatment of melasma. Participants applied the assigned formulation according to the study protocol for 4 weeks.

Matching placebo topical formulation identical in appearance, packaging, and administration schedule to the investigational product. Participants applied the placebo according to the study protocol for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

University of Guadalajara
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The investigational product and placebo were prepared, coded, and labeled by personnel independent of the clinical investigators. Participants, investigators, and outcome assessors remained blinded to treatment allocation throughout the study. The treatment code was maintained separately and was not disclosed until completion of the study.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the investigational topical formulation containing 12% azelaic acid and 5% tranexamic acid or a matching placebo. Both groups received the assigned intervention for 4 weeks. Participants remained in their assigned treatment group throughout the study, and no crossover between groups occurred.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 to 60 years. * Clinical diagnosis of facial melasma. * Fitzpatrick skin phototypes II to V. * Willing and able to comply with all study procedures and scheduled visits. * Willing to use sunscreen throughout the study. * Provided written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Known hypersensitivity to azelaic acid, tranexamic acid, or any component of the study formulation. * Use of topical or systemic treatment for melasma within the previous 3 months. * Presence of facial skin diseases or active skin infections that could interfere with study assessments. * Participation in another clinical trial during the study period. * Any medical condition that, in the investigator's judgment, could interfere with study participation or evaluation of the outcomes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scoreBaseline and Week 4Change in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) from baseline to Week 4. MASI was assessed by the investigator to evaluate clinical severity of melasma.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Melasma Quality of Life Scale (MELASQoL) scoreBaseline and Week 4Change in patient-reported quality of life using the Melasma Quality of Life Scale (MELASQoL) from baseline to Week 4.
Change in facial pigmentation assessed by VISIA®Baseline and Week 4Objective assessment of facial pigmentation using standardized VISIA® digital imaging, including evaluation of pigmentation intensity and spot count.
Incidence of treatment-related adverse eventsThroughout the 4-week treatment periodFrequency and severity of local adverse events, including erythema, pruritus, and burning sensations, recorded throughout the study.

Countries

Mexico

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 28, 2026