Skip to content

Kendall Versus Janda's Approach Along With Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercises in Upper Crossed Syndrome

Comparative Effects of Kendall Versus Janda's Approach Along With Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercises on Pain, Chest Expansion, Cranio Vertebral Angle, and Disability in Upper Crossed Syndrome

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07724574
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-07-24
Start date
2026-06-20
Completion date
2026-09-20
Last updated
2026-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Cross Syndrome

Keywords

upper crossed syndrome, breathing, disability

Brief summary

Upper Crossed Syndrome (UCS) is a postural imbalance in the upper body characterized by shortened and tight muscles in the front and upper back, while weak muscles in the back and neck are stretched and underactive. This imbalance can lead to forward head posture, rounded shoulders, and increased spinal curves, causing pain, headaches, and reduced range of motion. The study aims to compare the effects of Kendall exercises with Janda's Approach along with Diaphragmatic breathing exercises on pain, chest expansion, craniovertebral angle, and disability in upper crossed syndrome.

Detailed description

This randomized clinical trial study will be conducted at Central Hospital and Anwer's Polyclinic, Sialkot. We will include 50 patients (25 in each group) of Upper Crossed Syndrome with an age range of 30-50 years, both male and female will be included. Group A will be provided Kendall Exercises with Diaphragmatic breathing exercises, and Group B will receive Janda's with diaphragmatic breathing exercises. Both interventions will be administered for 45 minutes per session, three times per week, for a total duration of six weeks. Outcome measures will include NPRS for pain, Neck Disability Index for disability, Universal goniometer for cranio vertebral angle, and a measuring tape for thoracic expansion will be used. The collected data will be analyzed in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 26.0 version. If the data is normally distributed, then a parametric if not normally distributed than a nonparametric test will be applied.

Interventions

Stretching: Pectoralis, Upper Trapezius, Levator Scapulae (2 sets of 20 sec each) Strengthening: Scapular retractors with Thera band (2 sets of10 reps), Chin tucks (2 sets of 10 reps), Diaphragmatic breathing (4 mins) Strengthening: Add isometric cervical flexors (5 sec hold with 5 reps),, Chin tucks \& scapular retractors (3 sets of 10 reps) Strengthening: Add scapular squeeze (5 sec hold of 5 reps), Emphasize postural control during exercises Strengthening: Functional posture tasks (e.g., seated posture with resistance), Maintain 15 reps of 3 sets Anterior (Wall Slides), Deep Neck Flexors - 2 sets of 10 reps Diaphragmatic breathing (4 mins), Neck Flexor Hold: 30 sec × 3 sets Add Dumbbell Shrugs, Table Pushes - 3 sets of 10 reps Add Serratus Anterior Upper Cuts (3 sets of 10 reps) strengthening increased to 12-15 reps per set (all muscle groups). Functional integration: Posture tasks during daily movement

Stretching: Levator scapulae, Upper Trapezius, Pectoralis (doorway/towel) - 2 sets × 30 sec each, Strengthening: Middle \& Lower Trapezius, Serratus Anterior (Wall Slides), Deep Neck Flexors - 2 sets × 10 reps, Diaphragmatic breathing (4 mins) Neck Flexor Hold: 30 sec × 3 sets Add Dumbbell Shrugs, Table Pushes 3 sets × 10 reps Add Serratus Anterior Upper Cuts (3 sets × 10 reps) strengthening increased to 12-15 reps per set (all muscle groups). Maintain 3 sets of stretching. Functional integration: Posture tasks during daily movement (e.g., reaching, sitting)

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age between 30 to 50 years old Both male and female are included, Craniovertebral angle less than 50°, Rounded shoulders (on photogrammetry)

Exclusion criteria

* Cervical trauma or surgery Congenital scoliosis Spasmodic torticollis Any tumor or trauma History of surgical procedures on neck or lower back Disc issues in neck or lower back

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NUMERIC PAIN RATE SCALE (NPRS) for painupto 6 weeksIt is a self-reported scale that measures pain intensity on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). It is widely used in musculoskeletal conditions for monitoring pain levels over time. The NPRS has demonstrated high validity (r = 0.85 with VAS) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.92-0.96). The MCID for NPRS is generally considered to be 2 points, indicating a meaningful improvement or worsening in pain perception
NECK DISABILITY INDEX (NDI)upto 6 weeksIt is a validated questionnaire consisting of 10 items that assess the functional impact of neck pain on daily activities such as personal care, work, driving, and recreation. It is specific to cervical conditions. The NDI has strong content validity, with excellent internal consistency (α = 0.87) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.89). The MCID for NDI has been reported to range from 5 to 7 points, representing a clinically important change in neck-related disability
UNIVERSAL GONIOMETER for ROMUpto 6 weeksIt is used to measure the craniovertebral angle (CVA), an objective indicator of forward head posture in individuals. A CVA less than 50° typically indicates abnormal posture. This tool shows good validity and excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.80-0.98) for cervical spine angle measurements. While an exact MCID for CVA is not firmly established, a change of 3-5 degrees is often considered clinically meaningful in postural correction studies
MEASURING TAPEUpto 6 weekst is a simple and cost-effective tool used to assess chest expansion, which reflects thoracic mobility and respiratory function. The measurement is taken by placing the tape around the chest at the level of the fourth intercostal space during full inhalation and exhalation. It has acceptable criterion validity and demonstrates high intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.91-0.94), making it suitable for tracking changes in chest mobility during postural or breathing interventions. The MCID for chest expansion is not universally defined, but an increase of 0.5 to 1.0 cm is generally considered clinically relevant in pulmonary and postural rehabilitation contexts

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

CONTACTAmna Zia, PhD*
amna.zia@kemu.edu.pk03244686993
CONTACTSamrood Akram, PhD*
samrood.akram@riphah.edu.pk03324806143
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAmna Zia, PhD*

King Edward Medical University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORKinza Saif

Riphah International University, Lahore

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 25, 2026