Skip to content

Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CTO0307 in Adults With Presbyopia

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-design, Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CTO0307 in Adults With Presbyopia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07723716
Enrollment
167
Registered
2026-07-23
Start date
2025-02-26
Completion date
2025-09-25
Last updated
2026-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia

Keywords

presbyopia

Brief summary

This study was to compare the presbyopia correction effect between the treatment group and the control group, evaluated by the proportion of patients who achieved an improvement of 3 lines or more in mesopic binocular DCNVA at post-dose after 4 weeks of administration of the investigational product.

Interventions

DRUGCTO0307 Eye drop

Pilocarpine ophthalmic solution, one drop in each eye, once daily, for up to 28 days

Vehicle, one drop in each eye, once daily, for up to 28 days.

Sponsors

Taejoon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Men and women aged ≥40 years and \<65 years. 2. Patients who meet all of the following visual acuity assessment criteria: ① DCNVA between 20/100 and 20/40 (Snellen equivalent). ② CDVA of 20/25 or better (Snellen equivalent). 3. Patients who are capable of performing all study procedures, including questionnaires and examinations, and willing to cooperate with the investigator's instructions. 4. Patients who voluntarily provided written informed consent, or whose legally authorized representative provided written informed consent, to participate in this clinical trial.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with a history of ophthalmic surgery that may affect the absorption, distribution, or excretion of the investigational product, including cataract surgery, phakic intraocular lens (IOL) surgery, corneal inlay surgery, radial keratotomy (RK), or other intraocular surgeries. 2. Patients with a history of LASIK, LASEK, or PRK (Photorefractive Keratectomy) within one year prior to screening. 3. Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the components of the investigational product or other cholinergic agonist drugs. 4. Patients with the following conditions known to require cautious administration of the investigational product components: * Bronchial asthma, heart failure, Parkinson's disease. * Gastrointestinal (GI) stenosis (e.g., intestinal obstruction), duodenal ulcer, GI spasms, or clinically significant defecation disorders due to constipation. * Urinary tract obstruction due to urinary tract disorders. 5. Patients who have received at least one dose of another investigational product within 30 days prior to participation in this clinical trial. 6. Patients deemed inappropriate by the investigator due to other diseases or conditions that may affect the evaluation of the efficacy or safety of the clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Gaining 3 Lines or More in DCNVAWeek 4The proportion of patients who achieved an improvement of ≥3 lines from baseline in DCNVA (Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular Distance-Corrected Near Visual Acuity) at post-dose

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Gaining 2 Lines or More in DCNVA at Week 4Week 4The proportion of patients who achieved an improvement of ≥2 lines from baseline in DCNVA (Mesopic, High-contrast, Binocular Distance-Corrected Near Visual Acuity) at post-dose
Percentage of Participants with DCNVA of >20/40 at Week 4Week 4Percentage of Participants with DCNVA (Mesopic \& Photopic, High-contrast, Binocular Distance-Corrected Near Visual Acuity) of \>20/40 from Baseline
Percentage of Participants with improvement in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at Week 4.Week 4Patients assessed the impact of the IP on near vision improvement using the PGIC scale. After the investigator explained the assessment method, patients performed the evaluation independently based on their own judgment. 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. No change 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 29, 2026