Digital Health, Informed Consent, Patient Comprehension, Patient Education, Therapeutic Endoscopy
Conditions
Keywords
Digital consent, Informed consent, Advanced endoscopy, Therapeutic endoscopy, Patient comprehension, Patient education, Artificial intelligence, AI question-answering tool, Video-based consent, Patient satisfaction, Pre-procedural anxiety, Pragmatic randomized trial, Endoscopy workflow
Brief summary
This study will evaluate whether a digital-supported informed consent process improves patient understanding before advanced therapeutic endoscopy procedures. Patients undergoing advanced therapeutic endoscopy are often asked to make decisions about procedures that may be complex and involve important risks, benefits, and alternatives. Standard informed consent is usually provided through discussion with the treating physician. However, this process can vary between clinicians and may be affected by time pressures in busy endoscopy units. In this study, eligible adult patients scheduled for elective advanced therapeutic endoscopy will be randomly assigned to one of two consent pathways. One group will receive standard physician-led informed consent. The other group will receive a digital-supported consent pathway that includes a standardized procedure-specific educational video, an offline artificial intelligence-based question-answering tool, and final confirmation with the treating physician before the procedure. The digital tool is designed to provide plain-language information about the procedure, including why it is being done, expected benefits, common and serious risks, alternatives, what to expect before and after the procedure, and the patient's right to ask questions or decline the procedure. The AI question-answering tool will use only investigator-approved educational content and will not provide individualized medical advice. Questions requiring patient-specific medical judgment will be directed back to the treating clinical team. The main outcome of the study is patient comprehension of the consent information, measured after the assigned consent process and before the procedure. The study will also evaluate patient anxiety, satisfaction, confidence in decision-making, usability of the consent process, workflow outcomes, and consent-related safety or ethical concerns.
Detailed description
This is a pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating digital-supported informed consent compared with standard physician-led informed consent for adults undergoing elective advanced therapeutic endoscopy. The study will be conducted in three sequential phases. In the first phase, the digital consent tool will be developed through an iterative co-design process involving the study team, a specialist engineer, and at least one patient partner. The tool will include a standardized procedure-specific educational video and an offline artificial intelligence-based question-answering interface. The AI component will be developed using only investigator-approved educational materials, standardized consent language, and curated frequently asked questions. It will not browse the internet, retrieve external information in real time, or provide individualized medical advice. In the second phase, a pilot study will assess feasibility, usability, acceptability, and operational performance of the digital consent pathway. The pilot will assess whether participants can access and complete the video and AI interface, whether the digital tool functions as intended, whether the survey-based outcome assessment workflow is practical, and whether refinements are needed before the full randomized trial. The pilot phase is not intended to provide definitive comparative effectiveness results. In the third phase, the finalized intervention will be evaluated in a multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either standard physician-led informed consent or the digital-supported consent pathway. Randomization will be centralized and concealed using a secure web-based system, with stratification by site and potentially by major procedure category. Participants assigned to the standard consent arm will receive the usual physician-led informed consent process according to local clinical practice. Participants assigned to the digital-supported arm will receive access to a procedure-specific digital consent package, ideally before the procedure. The digital package will include a standardized educational video explaining the nature of the procedure, the reason it is being performed, expected benefits, major and common risks, reasonable alternatives, what to expect before and after the procedure, and the right to ask questions or decline the procedure. After viewing the video, participants may ask questions through a secure offline AI-based interface. The tool will provide plain-language responses grounded only in pre-approved study materials and will redirect individualized or high-risk questions to the treating clinical team. In both study arms, final procedural consent remains the responsibility of the treating physician. In the digital-supported arm, the physician will conduct a final confirmation discussion before the procedure to review unresolved questions, address individualized risks, benefits, and alternatives, confirm patient understanding, and complete standard institutional consent documentation. The primary outcome is patient comprehension of informed consent information, assessed immediately after completion of the assigned consent pathway and before the procedure. The comprehension assessment will address key domains of informed consent, including the nature of the procedure, indication, risks, benefits, alternatives, right to ask questions or refuse, and basic expectations before and after the procedure. Secondary outcomes include pre-procedural anxiety, satisfaction with the consent process, decisional confidence or self-efficacy, perceived usability and acceptability, perceived opportunity to ask questions, preference for future consent format, physician time spent on consent, staff time where measurable, consent-related delays, same-day cancellation or deferral due to unresolved consent concerns, and need for additional pre-procedural contact related to consent. Digital process outcomes will include video completion rate, AI tool utilization rate, number and categories of patient questions, frequency of questions escalated to clinician review, and completion of the intervention before arrival. Safety and ethical quality outcomes will include withdrawal of procedural consent after the assigned intervention, patient-reported misunderstanding, complaints related to the consent process, protocol deviations involving consent, and any adverse event judged related to misunderstanding of instructions or procedural expectations. The study is designed to minimize collection of identifiable information. Study outcomes will be collected primarily through secure survey links, and the research dataset will not include direct identifiers such as names, dates of birth, medical record numbers, addresses, email addresses, telephone numbers, or IP addresses. Any retained AI interaction data will be anonymized and will not be linked to participant identifiers.
Interventions
The digital-supported informed consent pathway consists of a standardized procedure-specific educational video, an offline AI-based question-answering interface, and final physician confirmation. The video explains the nature of the procedure, indication, expected benefits, major and common risks, alternatives, what to expect before and after the procedure, and the patient's right to ask questions or decline. The AI tool provides plain-language responses based only on investigator-approved educational materials and redirects individualized or high-risk questions to the treating clinical team.
The standard physician-led informed consent process consists of usual pre-procedure counseling by the treating physician according to local clinical practice. The physician discusses the procedure, indication, expected benefits, risks, alternatives, and patient questions, and completes standard institutional procedural consent documentation before the advanced therapeutic endoscopy procedure.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Participants and treating clinicians cannot be blinded because the intervention involves exposure to a digital consent pathway. Where feasible, outcome assessors scoring open-ended comprehension responses or reviewing de-identified outcome forms will remain blinded to treatment allocation.
Intervention model description
This is a pragmatic, multicenter, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either standard physician-led informed consent or a digital-supported informed consent pathway consisting of a standardized procedure-specific educational video, an offline AI-based question-answering tool, and final physician confirmation. Randomization will be centralized and concealed using a secure web-based system, with stratification by site and potentially by major procedure category.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adults aged 18 years or older * Scheduled to undergo elective advanced therapeutic endoscopy * Able to provide informed consent for study participation * Able to engage with study materials in a language supported by the site * Willing and able to complete study questionnaires and follow-up assessments
Exclusion criteria
* Emergent or urgent procedures where the consent process cannot reasonably incorporate the study intervention * Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent for study participation * Requirement for substitute decision-maker consent for the procedural decision itself, if this precludes meaningful use of the study intervention * Severe cognitive, visual, hearing, or communication limitations not adequately accommodated by site resources * Inability to complete the planned pre-procedural assessments * Prior enrollment in this study for the same procedural episode * Any clinical situation in which the treating endoscopist determines that study participation would be unsafe or inappropriate
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Comprehension of Informed Consent Information | Immediately after the assigned consent pathway and before sedation/procedure | Patient comprehension will be assessed using a structured procedure-specific comprehension instrument after the assigned consent pathway. The instrument will assess understanding of the nature of the procedure, purpose or indication, risks, benefits, alternatives, right to ask questions or refuse, and expectations before and after the procedure. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Procedural Anxiety | Immediately after the assigned consent pathway and before sedation/procedure | Participant-reported anxiety after completion of the assigned consent pathway, assessed using a study questionnaire or validated anxiety measure, as finalized in the study assessment plan. |
| Satisfaction With Consent Process | Immediately after the assigned consent pathway and before sedation/procedure | Participant-reported satisfaction with the assigned consent process, including perceived clarity and helpfulness of the information provided. |
| Decisional Confidence or Self-Efficacy | Immediately after the assigned consent pathway and before sedation/procedure | Participant-reported confidence in the decision to proceed with the procedure and perceived ability to make an informed decision after the consent process. |
| Usability and Acceptability of Consent Process | Immediately after the assigned consent pathway and before sedation/procedure | Participant-reported usability and acceptability of the assigned consent process. For participants in the digital-supported arm, this will include perceived usability and acceptability of the video and AI-based question-answering tool. |
| Perceived Opportunity to Ask Questions | Immediately after the assigned consent pathway and before sedation/procedure | Participant-reported perception of whether they had adequate opportunity to ask questions and have concerns addressed during the consent process. |
| Preference for Future Consent Format | Immediately after the assigned consent pathway and before sedation/procedure | Participant preference for future consent format, including whether they would prefer standard physician-led consent, digital-supported consent, or a combined approach in future procedures. |
| Physician Time Spent on Consent | From start to completion of the consent process on the procedure day | Total physician time spent on the consent process, measured where feasible using workflow tracking or routine operational data. |
| Consent-Related Staff Time | From start to completion of the consent process on the procedure day | Total staff time related to the consent process, where measurable using workflow tracking or routine operational data. |
| Consent-Related Delay | Procedure day, before procedure start | Delay attributable to the consent process, measured where feasible using routine operational or workflow data. |
| Same-Day Cancellation or Deferral Due to Consent Concerns | Procedure day | Proportion of participants whose procedure is canceled or deferred on the same day because of unresolved consent-related concerns. |
| Additional Pre-Procedural Contact Related to Consent | From enrollment to procedure start | Need for additional pre-procedural contact with the clinical or research team related to consent questions or concerns. |
| Video Completion Rate | Before procedure start | Proportion of participants assigned to the digital-supported arm who complete the standardized procedure-specific educational video. |
| AI Tool Utilization Rate | Before procedure start | Proportion of participants assigned to the digital-supported arm who use the offline AI-based question-answering tool. |
| Number and Categories of Patient Questions Asked | Before procedure start | Number and categories of questions submitted by participants through the digital question-answering interface. |
| Frequency of Questions Escalated to Clinician Review | Before procedure start | Number and proportion of participant questions that are flagged as individualized, complex, high-risk, or requiring clinician review. |
| Digital Intervention Completion Before Arrival | Before arrival for procedure | Proportion of participants assigned to the digital-supported arm who complete the digital consent pathway before arrival for the procedure. |
| Withdrawal of Procedural Consent After Assigned Intervention | After assigned consent pathway through procedure start | Proportion of participants who withdraw procedural consent after completing the assigned consent pathway. |
| Questionnaire Assessing Patient Understanding | immediately after the intervention | Participant-reported misunderstanding related to the consent information, procedure instructions, or procedural expectations identified after the procedure. |
| Complaints Related to Consent Process | immediately after the intervention | Number of participant complaints related to the consent process. |
| Protocol Deviations Involving Consent | From enrollment through study follow-up | Number of protocol deviations related to delivery or documentation of the study consent or procedural consent process. |
| Adverse Events Related to Misunderstanding of Instructions or Procedural Expectations | immediately after the intervention | Any adverse event judged to be related to misunderstanding of procedural instructions or expectations following the assigned consent pathway. |
Countries
Canada
Contacts
Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada