Skip to content

Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Technique on Children

Effects of Virtual Reality Technique on Some Vital Signs, Pain and Anxiety Scales During Dental Anaesthesia and Extraction in Children

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07722221
Enrollment
64
Registered
2026-07-23
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2023-03-12
Last updated
2026-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Anxiety, Pain Management, Pediatric Dentistry

Keywords

Dental extraction, Virtual reality, Local anesthesia

Brief summary

Studying the effect of using virtual reality technique in managing pain, anxiety, and vital signs among pediatric dental patients.

Detailed description

Local anaesthesia is essential for pain control during pediatric dental procedures, yet its administration can cause significant anxiety and distress in children. Recent innovations aim to improve the delivery of anesthesia to make it less painful and more acceptable. This randomized clinical trial studied the effect of using virtual reality technique in managing pain, anxiety, and vital signs among pediatric dental patients. A total of 64 healthy children aged 6 to 10 years participated in the study. The children were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Pain perception was measured using Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Anxiety was evaluated using Venham Picture Test. Vital signs, including pulse rate, oxygen saturation and blood pressure were monitored at baseline and during treatment. Satisfaction levels were assessed for the pediatric patients using child-friendly satisfaction questionnaires

Interventions

DEVICEConventional

Behaviour management was done using the conventional techniques (TSD, positive reinforcement) during Local anaesthesia and treatment (extraction)

DEVICEVirtual reality

Behaviour management was done using Virtual Reality technique during Local anaesthesia and treatment (extraction)

Sponsors

Latakia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Children aged 6-10 years. 2. Physically healthy with no neurological disorders or systemic diseases. 3. Children classified as positive" or "negative-positive" according to the modified Frankl Behavioral Rating Scale. 4. Not taking any sedatives or analgesics drugs

Exclusion criteria

1. Uncooperative children who exhibit clear behavioral problems. 2. Children with systemic diseases or disorders that may interfere with local anesthesia. 3. Use of any medications that may affect vital signs or pain response. 4. Presence of infection at the injection site.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain level during dental anesthesia and treatmentFrom the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of extraction, assessed up to 30 minutes.Procedural pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale to measure children's self-reported pain, It's a self-reported scale with six cartoon faces representing increasing levels of pain, scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Children were asked to point to the face that best described their pain. Higher scores on either scale indicated greater pain intensity.
Anxiety level during anesthesia and treatmentFrom the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of extraction, assessed up to 30 minutes.Anxiety was assessed using the Venham Picture Test (VPT), a self-reported measure of dental anxiety in children. The scale consists of 8 pairs of drawings, with the child selecting the picture that best reflects their feelings at each pair. Scores range from 0 to 8, where 0 indicates no anxiety and 8 indicates the highest level of anxiety. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulse rateFrom baseline measurement taken 5 minutes before local anesthetic injection, through the injection, and until completion of extraction, assessed up to 35 minutes.]Pulse rate was measured using a pulse oximeter and recorded in beats per minute (bpm). Readings were recorded at predefined intervals. Increases in heart rate indicated heightened stress or discomfort during the procedure.
Oxygen saturationFrom baseline measurement taken 5 minutes before local anesthetic injection, through the injection, and until completion of extraction, assessed up to 35 minutes.Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) was measured using a pulse oximeter and recorded as percentage of oxygen saturation (%). Readings were recorded at predefined intervals. Decreases in SpO2 indicated heightened stress or discomfort during the procedure
Blood pressureFrom baseline measurement taken 5 minutes before local anesthetic injection, through the injection, and until completion of extraction, assessed up to 35 minutes.Blood pressure was measured using an automated blood pressure monitor and recorded as systolic and diastolic blood pressure in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Higher values indicate higher blood pressure. Changes from baseline were used to assess the physiological response to the dental procedure.
Patient's satisfactionImmediately after the procedurePatient satisfaction was assessed using a structured questionnaire with two yes/no questions: 1. Are you satisfied with the experience? (Yes/No) 2. Would you like to have the same technique in future visits? (Yes/No) Responses were coded as binary outcomes (Yes = 1, No = 0). Higher total scores indicated greater patient satisfaction.

Countries

Syria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 24, 2026