Skip to content

Navigation Bronchoscopy Guided Microwave Ablation Versus SBRT in Early NSCLC

A Pragmatic Randomised Trial Comparing Navigation Bronchoscopy-guided Microwave Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Medically Inoperable or Surgery-declining Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07722182
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-07-23
Start date
2026-08-10
Completion date
2029-12-31
Last updated
2026-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer, navigation bronchoscopy, robotic assisted bronchoscopy, microwave ablation, stereotactic body radiotherapy, pragmatic randomised trial, local tumour control

Brief summary

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a standard definitive local therapy for medically inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Navigation bronchoscopy guided microwave ablation is an emerging alternative that may reduce treatment burden and avoid ionising radiation. However, comparative evidence against SBRT remains limited. Objective: To generate relevant comparative evidence to inform treatment selection for medically inoperable patients or patients who decline surgery with early-stage NSCLC. Methods: This is a Hong Kong led, pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group randomised controlled clinical trial with open label treatment delivery and blinded end point assessment. Eligible participants will be randomised one to one to navigation bronchoscopy guided microwave ablation or SBRT. Surveillance includes scheduled chest computed tomography at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, with independent blinded imaging adjudication using a prespecified review charter. The primary end point is 24-month local tumour control, defined as absence of local progression of the treated lesion. The primary analysis will follow intention to treat and will test noninferiority using an absolute risk difference margin of 0.15. Secondary outcomes include time to local progression, progression free survival, overall survival, treatment related toxicity and serious adverse events, patient reported outcomes including quality of life trajectories, and healthcare utilisation such as hospital visits, unplanned admissions, and retreatment. The target sample size is 100 participants, providing adequate power for the prespecified noninferiority margin and supporting secondary outcome estimation. Impact: Findings will directly inform multidisciplinary decision making, local pathway design, and service planning in Hong Kong and collaborating centres.

Interventions

PROCEDURENavigation Bronchoscopy-Guided Microwave Ablation

Bronchoscopic delivery of microwave thermal energy to ablate the target lung lesion using navigation bronchoscopy guidance. Treatment will be performed according to institutional standards, including navigational planning, intraprocedural imaging, and standard perioperative care.

RADIATIONStereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)

High-precision external beam radiotherapy delivered in a limited number of fractions to the target lung lesion according to institutional and standard-of-care radiation oncology protocols.

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. Adults aged 18 years or above. 2. Clinically stage IA NSCLC suitable for definitive local therapy, defined as T1N0M0 with maximum tumour diameter 3 cm or less, based on routine staging work up and multidisciplinary team review. 3\. Pathological confirmation of NSCLC by histology or cytology whenever feasible. If tissue confirmation is not feasible or poses unacceptable risk, eligibility may be allowed after multidisciplinary consensus that imaging and clinical features are highly consistent with primary lung cancer, consistent with SBRT guidance for selected unbiopsied cases. 4\. Medically inoperable status, or patient declines surgery after multidisciplinary discussion, and both navigation bronchoscopy-guided microwave ablation and SBRT are considered acceptable treatment options by the treating teams (clinical equipoise). 5\. Target lesion technically suitable for both modalities, including feasibility and safety for bronchoscopy-based ablation and suitability for SBRT planning and delivery. 6\. Willing and able to provide informed consent and accept random assignment to either navigation bronchoscopy guided microwave ablation or SBRT, and able to comply with the follow up schedule.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Evidence of lymph node involvement (N1 or higher) or distant metastases (M1) on routine staging. 2\. Multiple synchronous primary lung cancers requiring different local strategies, or inability to define a single index lesion for primary endpoint assessment. 3\. Prior thoracic radiotherapy that would overlap the planned SBRT field, or prior local therapy to the index lesion. 4\. Another active malignancy that is likely to confound outcome assessment (for example, malignancy requiring systemic therapy or expected to limit 2-year survival), except adequately treated non melanoma skin cancer or in situ carcinoma with negligible recurrence risk. 5. Contraindications to bronchoscopy sedation or anaesthesia that preclude RAB or ENB guided ablation, or medical conditions that preclude SBRT positioning or safe delivery. 6\. Lesions judged unsafe or technically infeasible for either modality (for example, proximity to critical structures beyond predefined safety limits), as determined by the procedural and radiation oncology teams. 7\. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 8. Inability or unwillingness to comply with study procedures or follow up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Local tumour control24 months after treatmentdefined as absence of radiological local progression of the treated lesion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Local Tumour Progression-Free Survival12 months post-treatmentTime from treatment initiation to local tumour progression or death from any cause.
Progression-Free Survival12 months post-treatmentTime from treatment initiation to disease progression (local or distant) or death from any cause.
Overall Survival12 months post-treatmentTime from treatment initiation to death from any cause.
Treatment-Related ToxicityUp to 12 months post-treatmentIncidence and severity of treatment-related toxicities graded according to CTCAE version 5.0.
Serious Adverse EventsUp to 12 months post-treatmentNumber of participants experiencing serious adverse events (SAEs).
Quality of LifeBaseline to 12 months post-treatmentChange in patient-reported quality of life scores measured using \[questionnaire name, e.g., EORTC QLQ-C30\].
Healthcare UtilisationUp to 12 months post-treatmentNumber of hospital visits, unplanned hospital admissions, and retreatment episodes following treatment.

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

CONTACTCalvin Sze Hang Ng
calvinng@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk85235052618
CONTACTNg
calvinng@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk+85291048780
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCalvin Sze Hang Ng

CUHK

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 25, 2026