Skip to content

Prospective Evaluation of Subcutaneous Administration of Daratumumab by the FreedomEDGE® Infusion System

Prospective Evaluation of Subcutaneous Administration of Daratumumab by the FreedomEDGE® Infusion System

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07721350
Acronym
ESCAPE
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-07-23
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2027-05-01
Last updated
2026-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma or Amyloidosis

Keywords

Multiple myeloma, amyloidosis, Daratumumab, Subcutaneous administration, Drug delivery device, Mechanical infusion system, FreedomEDGE®, Infusion pump, Clinical research, Medical device evaluation, Patient experience, Patient satisfaction, Nursing practice, Healthcare professionals, Treatment administration, Injection comfort, Device performance, Adverse events, Feasibility study

Brief summary

This study is evaluating a new method for administering daratumumab, a treatment commonly used in the management of multiple myeloma and amyloidosis. For several years, this treatment has been administered by subcutaneous injection in just a few minutes, significantly reducing the amount of time patients spend in hospital. Currently, this injection is performed manually by nurses. Although effective, this method may be demanding in daily practice due to the repetitive nature of the procedure and the physical workload involved for healthcare professionals. The aim of this study is to evaluate a medical device called FreedomEDGE®, developed by KORU Medical Systems, which enables mechanical and automated subcutaneous administration of daratumumab. This device operates without electricity: a spring-based system applies constant pressure to a syringe in order to deliver the medication steadily through a subcutaneous needle. This type of equipment is already used for the administration of other subcutaneous treatments, like immunoglobulins. The primary objective of the study is to assess whether this device enables safe and effective administration of the treatment. Secondary objectives include evaluating administration time, identifying potential technical malfunctions, describing the occurrence of local or systemic adverse events, and assessing the experience and satisfaction of both patients and nurses using the device. For patients, the expected benefits include more consistent and controlled administration, potential improvement in injection comfort, and a smoother care experience. For healthcare professionals, this approach may help to reduce the burden associated with repeated injections, improve working conditions, and support more efficient organisation of care in the day hospital setting. This study will be conducted in the daily hospitalisation unit of the Clinical Hematology Department at Lyon Sud Hospital and will include approximately 100 patients with multiple myeloma or amyloidosis receiving subcutaneous daratumumab. Participation is fully integrated into routine care. Patients who agree to participate will sign an informed consent form before any study-specific procedures are carried out. The treatment administered will remain exactly the same as that planned as part of routine care; only the method of administration will change, with one injection being delivered using the FreedomEDGE® device. An additional clinical assessment will be performed before administration to confirm that there are no contraindications to injection. After administration, patients will be asked to complete a short questionnaire regarding their experience and satisfaction, and nurses will also complete a questionnaire about their experience using the device. No additional blood samples, no additional medication, and no specific restrictions regarding usual treatments are planned as part of this study. Participation will end after the visit corresponding to the injection performed using the device. At any time, the investigator may discontinue participation if considered necessary for patient safety or in the patient's medical interest.

Detailed description

This clinical investigation is designed to generate clinical evidence supporting evaluation of the performance and safety of the FreedomEDGE® Infusion System for subcutaneous (SC) administration of daratumumab. Daratumumab is a human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody directed against CD38 and approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. The availability of a subcutaneous formulation has substantially reduced administration time compared with intravenous infusion while maintaining therapeutic effectiveness and improving treatment convenience. The approved SC formulation is administered continuously over approximately 3-5 minutes. In routine clinical practice, SC administration of daratumumab requires nurses to manually apply continuous pressure to the syringe plunger throughout the injection period in order to maintain administration conditions consistent with the approved product labelling. This manual procedure may introduce variability in injection duration and administration consistency and may contribute to patient discomfort, local injection-site reactions, and repetitive physical strain for healthcare professionals. The FreedomEDGE® Infusion System is a mechanical, non-electrical infusion device intended for controlled subcutaneous administration of medicinal products. The system combines a reusable infusion pump with sterile precision flow tubing and sterile High-Flo™ SubQ needle sets. Drug delivery is achieved through a constant-force spring mechanism associated with dedicated flow restriction tubing selected according to product viscosity and administration conditions. Although the device currently bears CE marking for selected approved subcutaneous therapies, administration of daratumumab is not currently included within its intended purpose. This clinical investigation is conducted within the framework of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices (MDR) as a clinical investigation intended to establish conformity of a CE-marked device used outside its currently approved intended purpose, with the objective of supporting extension of CE marking. According to applicable European and national regulatory classification criteria, this investigation corresponds to regulatory category 1. This is a prospective, single-centre, non-randomized clinical investigation conducted in the Clinical Hematology Department of Lyon-Sud hospital (Pierre-Bénite, France). The primary objective is to evaluate the performance of the FreedomEDGE® Infusion System for subcutaneous administration of daratumumab. Device performance is defined as the ability to provide reliable, controlled, and complete administration of the prescribed dose under normal conditions of use and according to the device instructions for use. Eligible participants must be adults, diagnosed of multiple myeloma or light-chain amyloidosis; treated with monthly subcutaneous daratumumab. Participants are recruited among patients routinely followed in the Clinical Hematology Department and receiving daratumumab in the day hospital setting. Enrolment occurs once treatment reaches the monthly administration phase, corresponding to patients who have already received several prior manual SC injections and therefore have prior experience with standard administration. Approximately 100 evaluable administrations are planned. Based on expected routine activity and patient flow, recruitment is expected to be completed over approximately six months. At Screening and Inclusion time (T0), potential participants are identified during routine follow-up within the hematology department. Patients whose daratumumab schedule reaches monthly administration are informed about the study by a physician co-investigator. Patients receive oral and written information describing study objectives, procedures, constraints, potential risks, safety measures, and participant rights, including the right to refuse participation or withdraw consent at any time without impact on standard care. Written informed consent is obtained before any study-specific procedure. Eligibility criteria are subsequently verified in full before formal enrolment. Clinical evaluation at inclusion is limited to routine assessment and observation of the future injection site. The study intervention is performed at the participant's next scheduled monthly administration visit (M1). Subcutaneous daratumumab is administered using the FreedomEDGE® Infusion System according to the device instructions for use and following nurse training. Administration is performed using a prefilled daratumumab syringe connected to dedicated precision flow tubing (reference F1200) and a sterile High-Flo™ SubQ needle set (24G, 9 mm). After skin preparation and placement of the needle, the syringe is loaded into the device and administration is initiated. Following administration, the following data are collected: device traceability information; administration duration; total injected volume compared with prescribed volume; occurrence and description of any device malfunction; corrective actions implemented to complete administration if required; occurrence of local skin reactions; occurrence of systemic adverse events. Following administration, nurses complete a study-specific questionnaire assessing: pain associated with administration; ease of use; ease of injection; device reliability; overall satisfaction; preference between manual administration and device-assisted administration; interest in extending use of the system to other therapies. Patients complete a study-specific questionnaire assessing: injection experience; comfort; satisfaction; preference between manual administration and device-assisted administration. Questionnaires are completed shortly after administration and require approximately five minutes. The end-of-study visit corresponds to the M1 administration visit. Participant follow-up ends after completion of this visit. No biological samples are collected specifically for study purposes. No additional visits, laboratory tests, imaging procedures, or invasive assessments are required beyond standard care. Expected benefits for patients include more standardized and controlled administration, improved injection comfort, and reduction of injection-related discomfort. Expected benefits for healthcare professionals include reduced physical strain associated with repeated manual injections and improved working conditions. Risks associated with device use are expected to remain comparable to routine subcutaneous administration and include administration error, contamination, injection-site trauma, and local reactions such as redness, swelling, or pain. Appropriate monitoring and risk mitigation procedures are implemented throughout the study. In case of device malfunction, administration may be completed manually according to standard practice. Overall, considering the anticipated improvements in administration standardization and user experience together with the limited and controlled risks associated with the procedure, the expected benefit-risk profile is considered favourable.

Interventions

DEVICESubcutaneous Daratumumab Administration Using FreedomEDGE®

Participants will receive a single administration of subcutaneous daratumumab using the FreedomEDGE® mechanical infusion system during a routine scheduled treatment visit. The medicinal product, dose, indication, and standard clinical management remain unchanged and follow usual care. The intervention consists exclusively of replacing the standard manual nurse-administered subcutaneous injection with device-assisted administration. FreedomEDGE® is a non-electric mechanical infusion device that uses a spring-driven mechanism to apply constant pressure to a prefilled syringe, enabling controlled and continuous delivery of daratumumab through a subcutaneous needle connected by tubing. Prior to administration, a brief clinical assessment will confirm the absence of contraindications to treatment administration. No additional procedures, medications, or biological sampling are planned as part of the intervention.

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER
KORU Medical Systems
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 and over * Having a diagnosis of multiple myeloma or light chain amyloidosis * Whose daratumumab is prescribed SC * Whose treatment with daratumumab takes place in a day hospital * Whose treatment with daratumumab is in the monthly injection period * Whose treatment with daratumumab has been carried out manually until now * Having signed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* Having known allergies to the metals of the infusion set (stainless steel) * Presenting bleeding disorders * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Persons placed under guardianship, curatorship or under judicial protection; * Persons deprived of their liberty, persons subject to psychiatric care and persons admitted to a health or social establishment for purposes other than that of clinical investigation; * Persons who are not affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiaries of such a scheme. * Subject participating in another interventional research including an exclusion period still in progress at pre-inclusion and which may interfere with the present study according to the judgment of the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Delivery Success Rate of Device-Assisted Subcutaneous Daratumumab AdministrationMonth 1, at the end of the procedurePerformance will be assessed by the proportion of system-assisted subcutaneous administrations achieving complete delivery (100%) of the prescribed 15 mL dose without device-related malfunction or unplanned manual intervention (delivery success).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subcutaneous Daratumumab Administration Duration (minutes)Month 1, at the end of the procedureDaratumumab injection duration (in minutes)
Number of malfunction occuringMonth 1, at the end of the procedureNumber of malfunction occurence
Type of malfunctions occuringMonth 1, at the end of the procedureType of malfunctions occurence
Recourse methods in case of malfunctionMonth 1, at the end of the procedureDescription of recourse methods implemented to ensure that the injection is carried out in its entirety following malfunctions
Skin or systemic eventswithin 5 minutes of end of administrationOccurrence of at least one skin reaction or systemic event
Number of reactionswithin 5 minutes of end of administrationNumber of reactions per patient
Type of reactionswithin 5 minutes of end of administrationType of reactions (at puncture point or generalized)
Grade of reactionswithin 5 minutes of end of administrationGrade of reactions (according to CTCAE)
Accountability of adverse reactionMonth 1, at the end of the procedureCount of adverse reactions related to the device
Nurses Pain scalewithin 5 minutes of end of administrationScore obtained on a pain scale (VAS from 0 to 10)
Nurses repetitiveness feltMonth 1, at the end of the day, post-use of the infusion system for each nurseThe repetitiveness of nurse gesture (scores obtained on a scale developed by the hematology department)
Nurses ease of installation and connection feltMonth 1, at the end of the day, post-use of the infusion system for each nurseThe ease of installation and connection for nurse (scores obtained on a scale developed by the hematology department)
Nurses ease of injection feltMonth 1, at the end of the day, post-use of the infusion system for each nurseThe ease of injection for nurses (scores obtained on a scale developed by the hematology department)
Nurses system reliability feltMonth 1, at the end of the day, post-use of the infusion system for each nurseThe system reliability felt for nurses (scores obtained on a scale developed by the hematology department)
Nurses perception of patient comfortMonth 1, at the end of the day, post-use of the infusion system for each nurseNurses perception of patient comfort (scores obtained on a scale developed by the hematology department)
Nurses overall satisfactionMonth 1, at the end of the day, post-use of the infusion system for each nurseScore of Nurses overall satisfaction with a Lickert scale
Nurses preference systemMonth 1, at the end of the day, post-use of the infusion system for each nurseExpression of the preference of the injection system thanks to the DM compared to the classic manual method
Patients feeling about comfort5 minutes after completion of injectionScore obtained on a likert scale
Patients global satisfaction5 minutes after completion of injectionScore obtained on a likert scale
Patients preference5 minutes after completion of injectionExpression of the preference of the injection system using medical device compared with the manual method

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTZofia GROSS, MD
zofia.gross@chu-lyon.fr+33 4 78 86 30 71
CONTACTMagali MAIRE, PhD
magali.maire@chu-lyon.fr+33 4 78 86 43 04
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORZofia GROSS, MD

Groupement Hospitalier Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 24, 2026