Skip to content

Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate Versus Bipolar TURP

A Comparative Study Of Clinical Outcomes Of Bipolar Enucleation Of The Prostate Versus Bipolar TURP In Management Of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia : A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07718256
Acronym
TURP
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-07-21
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
2026-07-14
Last updated
2026-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostate Hypertrophy(BPH)

Brief summary

Bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BEEP) was introduced to treat patients with large prostate. The study compared the functional outcomes and perioperative complications of bipolar TURP and bipolar enucleation of large prostates above 80 gm.

Detailed description

Recent literature suggests that enucleation techniques may provide superior functional results, reduced bleeding, and lower retreatment rates. Nevertheless, there remains limited high-quality randomized controlled data directly comparing bipolar TURP and bipolar enucleation of prostate as a head to head comparison regarding functional outcomes and peri-operative complications. In this study, a randomized controlled trial was performed to compare bipolar enucleation of the prostate versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in BPH regarding symptoms relief, residual adenoma, urine flow rate and post-operative morbidity.

Interventions

PROCEDUREbTURP

transurethral resection of the prostate by bipolar current

PROCEDUREBEEP

endoscopic enucleation of the prostate by bipolar current

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

A statistician randomized the eligible patients using block randomization with a block size of 8. Allocation concealment was achieved using sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. The participants were blinded to the assigned type of intervention at the time of surgery. Outcome assessors also were blinded, whereas surgeons were not blinded.

Intervention model description

one group had undergone bipolar TURP and the other group had undergone bipolar enucleation of the prostate

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All male patients above the age of 40 years who presented to the urology clinic in Ain Shams university hospitals with BPH with prostate size 80 - 120 g and have any of the following criteria: * Voiding symptoms that are poorly responsive to medical treatment (IPSS more than 18 and Qmax less than 15 ml/sec) * Persistent or recurrent attacks of urine retention due to BPH. * Large bladder stones from BPH. * Recurrent UTI due to BPH. * Severe gross hematuria from BPH.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with untreated or active UTI. * Previous pelvic radiation or pelvicl trauma. * Patients with anesthesia contraindications such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, severe coagulation disorders and severe cardiac diseases. * Known or suspected neurogenic bladder. * Urethral stricture or urethral cancer.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
volume of residual prostatic adenomaone month postoperativemeasurement of volume of residual prostatic adenoma post bipolar TURP and BEEP was done by pelvi-abdominal ultrasound
change in international prostate symptoms scorepre-operative, one, three, six and twelve months postoperativeThe international prostate symptoms score is a patient-completed questionnaire for standardized assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). It includes seven questions that evaluate the following urinary symptoms: * Weak urinary stream (0 : 5) * Incomplete bladder emptying (0 : 5) * Straining during urination (0 : 5) * Intermittent urine flow (0 : 5) * Increased urinary frequency (0 : 5) * Urgency (0 : 5) * Nocturia (0 : 5) Grade 1 (score = 0 - 7) : Mild LUTS Grade 2 (score = 8 - 19) : Moderate LUTS Grade 3 (score = 20 - 35) : Severe LUTS
change in maximum urine flow rate(Q max)pre-operative, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperativeMaximum urine flow rate was evaluated by Uroflowmetry

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change in post voiding residual urinepre-operative, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperativepost voiding residual urine in bladder was evaluated by Trans-abdominal ultrasound
operation timeduring operationOperation time was calculated from insertion of the cystoscope/resectoscope into the urethra to final removal of the scope

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 1, 2026